skip to main content
10.1145/3568834.3568922acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicibeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Subject-object Interaction and New Interpretation of Cyberspace: A Grounded Theory Analysis of Online “Sang Culture” Formation Mechanism

Published:25 January 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, online "Sang Culture" as a type of Internet culture is gaining influence on the thinking patterns and value systems of Internet users, especially young adults. Its prevalence is the result of interaction between the subject and the object of this specific social practice, and the cyberspace in which online “Sang Culture” flourishes performs a variety of different functions during this interaction process. This study explores the formation mechanism of online "Sang Culture" based on the question-and-answer data from an online platform using the method and techniques in grounded theory and seeks to interpret the multiple roles of cyberspace. According to the three-stage coding analysis, the internal cause of online "Sang Culture" lies in the subjective feelings and expression needs of the netizens. Their subjective self-perception, objective social conditions, and social value orientation are contextual conditions, while the dual background of the Internet era and China's economic transformation are the intervention conditions. The study can not only help understand the multidimensional influence of online “Sang Culture” on the value system of the netizens and guide the positive and healthy development of Internet culture but also provide reference to the overall improvement of social development.

References

  1. K. Cohen Tan and Shuxin Cheng. 2020. Sang Subculture in Post-reform China. Global Media and China. 5, 1(March 2020), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436420904459Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Dandan Dong. 2020. Collective Representation of Emotion: A Study on the Psychological Mechanism of Adolescents’ Emotional Socialization Based on Sang Language. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica. 29, 5, 1881-1887. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207209211002091 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Kevin M. Leander and Kelly K. McKim. 2003. Tracing the everyday 'sitings' of adolescents on the internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, communication & information. 3, 2 (July 2003), 211-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636310303140Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. David Porter. 2013. Internet culture. Routledge. London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hongfeng Zhang, Ke Li, and Johnny F. I. Lam. 2022. A Phenomenological Study of Online Assessment Perceptions of Macao Higher Learning Institutions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Dual Perspectives of Students and Instructors. In 2022 3rd International Conference on Education Development and Studies (pp. 76-82). https://doi.org/10.1145/3528137.3528151Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Diane Walker and Florence Myrick. 2006. Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative Health Research. 16, 4 (April, 2006), 547-559.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage. Newbury Park, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Xiangming Chen. 1999. Grounded theory: its train of thought and methods. Educational Research and Experiment. 4, 58-63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hongyuan Su and Ruixin Jia. 2019. Social Representation of Internet “Sang Culture” Under the Perspective of Post-subculture. Modern Communication(Journal of Communication University of China). 5, 12-19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lin Liu and Ailei Xie. 2017. Muddling through school life: An ethnographic study of the subculture of ‘deviant'students in China. International Studies in Sociology of Education. 26, 2 (April, 2017), 151-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2016.1200995Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Tianyu Zhou. 2022. Online Cultural Comparison between China and the US: A Research on the Connotation of Pepe the Frog Memes. In 2022 International Conference on Comprehensive Art and Cultural Communication (CACC 2022). Atlantis Press, 85-89. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220502.019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Andy Bennett. 1999. Subcultures or neo-tribes? Rethinking the relationship between youth, style and musical taste. Sociology. 33, 3 (August, 1999), 599-617. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0038038599000371Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Marcella Szablewicz. 2014. The ‘losers’ of China's Internet: Memes as ‘structures of feeling’ for disillusioned young netizens. China Information. 28, 2 (July, 2014), 259-275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203x14531538Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Rob Heyman and Jo Pierson. 2015. Social media, delinguistification and colonization of lifeworld: changing faces of facebook. Social Media+ Society. 1, 2 (July, 2015), 2056305115621933. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115621933Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jérémie Pelletier-Gagnon and Axel Pérez Trujillo Diniz. 2021. Colonizing Pepe: Internet memes as cyberplaces. Space and Culture. 24, 1 (February, 2021), 4-18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kouyan Dong. (2017). The Phenomenon of "Sang Culture" and the Social Mentality of Youth in Perspective. China Youth Study. 11, 23-28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Shan Huang. 2014. Independence at Large: Contemporary China's Alternative Music Scenes and the Cultural Practices of Post Socialist Urban Youth. Unpublished MA thesis, University of South Carolina.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Subject-object Interaction and New Interpretation of Cyberspace: A Grounded Theory Analysis of Online “Sang Culture” Formation Mechanism

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICIBE '22: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering
      September 2022
      552 pages
      ISBN:9781450397582
      DOI:10.1145/3568834

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 January 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format