skip to main content
10.1145/3569192.3569201acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Unsupervised discovery of Mild Cognitive Impairment subtypes of Alzheimer's disease using consensus clustering and unsupervised learning techniques

Published:27 January 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Discovering and characterizing reproducible disease subtypes results is one of the most demanding and fundamental tasks in many fields, such as bioinformatics and health informatics. It could facilitate diagnosis and is a vital step toward more individualized therapy. This paper aims to analyze the ability of unsupervised learning methods to identify a small collection of reliable and stable subtypes of subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and to discover the primary prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD) stages in subjects with MCI to AD conversion risk. We present a novel unsupervised learning methodology to identify the notable stable and reproducible subtypes. The proposed method takes advantage of the consensus clustering of unsupervised clustering methods. For this mean, we obtained the data from the Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. 346 features, including demographic information and MRI-derived features, described 839 subjects with early MCI. We randomly split the data into discovery (70%) and validation (30%) sets. The discovery set was analyzed using five unsupervised clustering methods, and robust consensus clustering was used to determine the most stable and reliable subtypes. The results show that the proposed method identified four different MCI patient subtypes. After discovery, subtypes were predicted in the testing set and associated with MCI conversion. One subtype had a high-risk (OR = 2.99, 95%CI = 1.65 to 5.41) of converting to Alzheimer's disease. 

References

  1. Arem, Hannah, and Erikka Loftfield. "Cancer epidemiology: a survey of modifiable risk factors for prevention and survivorship." American journal of lifestyle medicine 12.3 (2018): 200-210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Li, Xiaowan, and Fei Zhu. "On clustering algorithms for biological data." Engineering 5.549 (2013): 10-4236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Alashwal, Hany, "The application of unsupervised clustering methods to Alzheimer's disease." Frontiers in computational neuroscience 13 (2019): 31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Wiwie, Christian, Jan Baumbach, and Richard Röttger. "Comparing the performance of biomedical clustering methods." Nature methods 12.11 (2015): 1033-1038.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Chien-Hsing. "A hybrid intelligent model of analyzing clinical breast cancer data using clustering techniques with feature selection." Applied Soft Computing 20 (2014): 4-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Nilashi, M., O. Ibrahim, and A. Ahani. "‘Accuracy improvement for predicting Parkinson's disease progression,’’Sci." (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yilmaz, Nihat, Onur Inan, and Mustafa Serter Uzer. "A new data preparation method based on clustering algorithms for diagnosis systems of heart and diabetes diseases." J Med Syst 38 (2014): 48-59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Nezhadmoghadam, Fahimeh, "Robust Discovery of Mild Cognitive impairment subtypes and their Risk of Alzheimer's Disease conversion using unsupervised machine learning and Gaussian Mixture Modeling." Current Alzheimer Research 18.7 (2021): 595-606.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Alashwal, Hany, "The application of unsupervised clustering methods to Alzheimer's disease." Frontiers in computational neuroscience 13 (2019): 31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Károly, Artúr István, Róbert Fullér, and Péter Galambos. "Unsupervised clustering for deep learning: A tutorial survey." Acta Polytechnica Hungarica 15.8 (2018): 29-53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Matthew D. Wilkerson, D. Neil Hayes, ConsensusClusterPlus: a class discovery tool with confidence assessments and item tracking, Bioinformatics 26 (12) (2010) 1572–1573.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Association, A.s., 2018 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 2018. 14(3): p. 367-429.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ward, A., , Rate of conversion from prodromal Alzheimer's disease to Alzheimer's dementia: a systematic review of the literature. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra, 2013. 3(1): p. 320-332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Marinescu, Razvan V., "The alzheimer's disease prediction of longitudinal evolution (TADPOLE) challenge: Results after 1 year follow-up." arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.03419 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Edmonds, E.C., , Early versus late MCI: Improved MCI staging using a neuropsychological approach. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 2019. 15(5): p. 699-708.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Aisen, P.S., , Clinical Core of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: progress and plans. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 2010. 6(3): p. 239-246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. McInnes, Leland, John Healy, and James Melville. "Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction." arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Rogovschi, Nicoleta, "t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding Spectral Clustering using higher order approximations." Aust. J. Intell. Inf. Process. Syst. 17.1 (2019): 78-86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Abdi, Hervé, and Lynne J. Williams. "Principal component analysis." Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: computational statistics 2.4 (2010): 433-459.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Senbabaoğlu, Y., G. Michailidis, and J.Z. Li, Critical limitations of consensus clustering in class discovery. Scientific reports, 2014. 4(1): p. 1-13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Tang, Ming, "Evaluating single-cell cluster stability using the Jaccard similarity index." Bioinformatics 37.15 (2021): 2212-2214.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang, Shaohong, Hau-San Wong, and Ying Shen. "Generalized adjusted rand indices for cluster ensembles." Pattern Recognition 45.6 (2012): 2214-2226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Szumilas, M., Explaining odds ratios. Journal of the Canadian academy of child and adolescent psychiatry, 2010. 19(3): p. 227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Schober, Patrick, and Thomas R. Vetter. "Kaplan-meier curves, log-rank tests, and cox regression for time-to-event data." Anesthesia & Analgesia 132.4 (2021): 969-970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Kassambara, A., , Package ‘survminer’. Drawing Survival Curves using ‘ggplot2’.(R package version 0.3. 1.), 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Gamberger, D., , Identification of clusters of rapid and slow decliners among subjects at risk for Alzheimer's disease. Scientific reports, 2017. 7(1): p. 1-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Unsupervised discovery of Mild Cognitive Impairment subtypes of Alzheimer's disease using consensus clustering and unsupervised learning techniques

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICBRA '22: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Bioinformatics Research and Applications
      September 2022
      165 pages
      ISBN:9781450396868
      DOI:10.1145/3569192

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 January 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format