skip to main content
10.1145/3569551.3569553acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnsyssConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Asynchronous Line Formation in Presence of Faulty Robots

Published:20 December 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we study the line formation problem using n oblivious point mobile robots located on distinct positions on the Euclidean plane. We assume that the robots agree on one coordinate axis. Robots operate in Look-Compute-Move (LCM) cycles and any two robots can see each other only if there is no robot present on the line segment joining them. Our aim is to solve the line formation problem even if some robots become faulty before achieving the goal. The robots cannot move anymore once they become faulty. We present a fault-tolerant distributed algorithm for line formation under y-axis agreement which runs in O(n) epochs in semi-synchronous setting. The same algorithm runs in D/ymin epochs in asynchronous setting, where D is the vertical distance between the farthest robots along the y-axis and ymin is the minimum non-zero vertical distance traveled by a robot in each LCM cycle.

References

  1. Subhash Bhagat and Krishnendu Mukhopadyaya. 2017. Fault-tolerant gathering of semi-synchronous robots. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Quentin Bramas and Sébastien Tixeuil. 2016. Brief Announcement: Probabilistic asynchronous arbitrary pattern formation. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing. 443–445.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Sruti Gan Chaudhuri, Swapnil Ghike, Shrainik Jain, and Krishnendu Mukhopadhyaya. 2014. Pattern Formation for Asynchronous Robots without Agreement in Chirality. CoRR abs/1403.2625(2014). arXiv:1403.2625http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.2625Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Shantanu Das, Paola Flocchini, Nicola Santoro, and Masafumi Yamashita. 2015. Forming sequences of geometric patterns with oblivious mobile robots. Distributed Computing 28, 2 (2015), 131–145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Xavier Défago and Samia Souissi. 2008. Non-uniform circle formation algorithm for oblivious mobile robots with convergence toward uniformity. Theoretical Computer Science 396, 1-3 (2008), 97–112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Paola Flocchini, Giuseppe Prencipe, Nicola Santoro, and Giovanni Viglietta. 2017. Distributed computing by mobile robots: uniform circle formation. Distributed Computing 30, 6 (2017), 413–457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Paola Flocchini, Giuseppe Prencipe, Nicola Santoro, and Peter Widmayer. 2008. Arbitrary pattern formation by asynchronous, anonymous, oblivious robots. Theoretical Computer Science 407, 1-3 (2008), 412–447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Debasish Pattanayak, Klaus-Tycho Foerster, Partha Sarathi Mandal, and Stefan Schmid. 2020. Conic Formation in Presence of Faulty Robots. In Algorithms for Sensor Systems, Cristina M. Pinotti, Alfredo Navarra, and Amitabha Bagchi (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 170–185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Debasish Pattanayak, Kaushik Mondal, H Ramesh, and Partha Sarathi Mandal. 2019. Gathering of mobile robots with weak multiplicity detection in presence of crash-faults. J. Parallel and Distrib. Comput. 123 (2019), 145–155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Giuseppe Prencipe. 2007. Impossibility of gathering by a set of autonomous mobile robots. Theoretical Computer Science 384, 2-3 (2007), 222–231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Yusaku Tomita, Yukiko Yamauchi, Shuji Kijima, and Masafumi Yamashita. 2017. Plane formation by synchronous mobile robots without chirality. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.06521(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Yukiko Yamauchi, Taichi Uehara, Shuji Kijima, and Masafumi Yamashita. 2017. Plane formation by synchronous mobile robots in the three-dimensional euclidean space. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 64, 3 (2017), 1–43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Yukiko Yamauchi and Masafumi Yamashita. 2013. Pattern formation by mobile robots with limited visibility. In International Colloquium on Structural Information and Communication Complexity. Springer, 201–212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Asynchronous Line Formation in Presence of Faulty Robots
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            NSysS '22: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Networking, Systems and Security
            December 2022
            113 pages
            ISBN:9781450399036
            DOI:10.1145/3569551

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 December 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate12of44submissions,27%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format