skip to main content
10.1145/3569966.3570030acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A DV-Hop Localization Algorithm Using Classifying Average Hop Distance in Wireless Sensor Networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 December 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

DV-Hop localization algorithm contains a straightforward structure and is widely employed in wireless sensor network node localization. The DV-Hop localization algorithm has a fundamental error within the average hop distance calculation. Thus this paper proposes a DV-Hop localization algorithm using classifying average hop distance(CADV-Hop algorithm). We provide a CADV-Hop algorithm to calculate the typical hop distance by categorizing utterly different hop counts. The simulation results show that the improved algorithm will improve the localization accuracy compared to the DV-Hop algorithm.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Tian, J. , Zhang, T. , Ji, F. , Xu, Y. , & Wang, Y. 2019. A centroid localization algorithm for wireless sensor networks based on finite element method. 2019 IEEE 8th Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference (ITAIC). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Shit, R. C. , Sharma, S. , Puthal, D. , & Zomaya, A. Y. 2018. Location of things (lot): a review and taxonomy of sensors localization in iot infrastructure. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, PP(3), 1-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Deng, Y. , Zhu, Y. , Yang, Y. F. , Cheng, X. H. , & Chao-Qing, L. I. 2019. Research on rfid indoor location algorithm based on bp neural network. Journal of Chinese Computer Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Liu, C. , & Wu, K. 2005. Performance evaluation of range-free localization methods for wireless sensor networks. Performance, Computing, & Communications Conference, Ipccc IEEE International. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jiang, R. , Wang, X. , & Zhang, L. 2018. Localization algorithm based on iterative centroid estimation for wireless sensor networks. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 1-11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Luo, C., W., Fan, M., & Yang, 2014. A collaborative positioning algorithm for mobile target using multisensor data integration in enclosed environments. COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS -GUILDFORD THEN AMSTERDAM- BUTTERWORTH SCIENTIFIC LIMITED THEN ELSEVIER-.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fang, W. , & Gao, Y. 2014. A weighted centroid localization algorithm based on rssi for wireless sensor network in straight narrow tunnel. Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fokin, G. 2019. AOA Measurement Processing for Positioning using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. 2019 IEEE International Black Sea Conference on Communications and Networking (BlackSeaCom). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. He, T. , Huang, C. , Blum, B. M. , Stankovic, J. A. , & Abdelzaher, T. 2003. Range-free localization schemes for large scale sensor networks. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, MOBICOM 2003, 2003, San Diego, CA, USA, September 14-19, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Nagpal, R. 2002. Organizing a Global Coordinate System from Local Information on an Amorphous Computer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Capkun, S. , Hamdi, M. , & Hubaux, J. 2001. GPS-free Positioning in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Niculescu, D. , & Nath, B. 2003. Ad hoc positioning system (APS) using AOA. INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-Second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications. IEEE Societies. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Wang, X. , Nie, Y. , & Xu, F. 2017. An improved dv-hop localization algorithm based on coordinate correction. Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators, 30(10), 1560-1564.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Xiao-Xu, M. A. , Liu, W. J. , & Wang, Z. 2018. The improved dv-hop localization algorithm based on secondary correction error. Microelectronics & Computer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang, J. , Hou, A. , Tu, Y. , & Yu, H. 2020. An improved dv-hop localization algorithm based on selected anchors. Computers, Materials and Continua(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumar, S. , & Lobiyal, D. K. 2013. An advanced dv-hop localization algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications: An International Journal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Prashar, D. , Jyoti, K. , & Kumar, D. 2018. Design and analysis of distance error correction-based localization algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 29(4), e3547.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Zhou, C. , & Amp, S. V. 2016. Research into wpso-dvhop algorithm in node positioning in wireless sensing. Computer Measurement & Control.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Cui, L. , Xu, C. , Li, G. , Ming, Z. , Feng, Y. , & Lu, N. 2018. A high accurate localization algorithm with dv-hop and differential evolution for wireless sensor network. Applied Soft Computing, S1568494618301595.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A DV-Hop Localization Algorithm Using Classifying Average Hop Distance in Wireless Sensor Networks
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CSSE '22: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering
        October 2022
        753 pages
        ISBN:9781450397780
        DOI:10.1145/3569966

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 December 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate33of74submissions,45%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format