skip to main content
10.1145/3569966.3570048acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Efficient Parallel Computation Of 3D Model Deformation Based On Conformal Mapping

Published: 20 December 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In general, the animation between three-dimensional models uses linear interpolation between models to calculate the intermediate state. Before interpolation, the mapping relationship between the source model and the target model should be calculated to find the one-to-one correspondence of vertices. It is often necessary to traverse all vertices of the mesh in interpolation calculation, it can be difficult to implement parallel operation due to the irregularity of triangular mesh. This paper is aimed to form a regular representation of the 3D model in the conformal parameterization and set up efficient parallel computing under the regular structure so as to improve the efficiency of deformation computing of 3D models.

References

[1]
Bart Adams, Maks Ovsjanikov, Michael Wand, Hans-Peter Seidel, and Leonidas J Guibas. 2008. Meshless modeling of deformable shapes and their motion. In Computer animation/ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation. ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation, Vol. 2008. NIH Public Access, 77.
[2]
Seung-Yeob Baek, Jeonghun Lim, and Kunwoo Lee. 2015. Isometric shape interpolation. Computers & Graphics 46(2015), 257–263.
[3]
Mirela Ben-Chen and Craig Gotsman. 2005. On the optimality of spectral compression of mesh data. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 24, 1 (2005), 60–80.
[4]
Robert Cohen, Dong Tian, and Anthony Vetro. 2017. Point Cloud Compression using Prediction and Shape-Adaptive Transforms. US Patent App. 15/004,301.
[5]
Ricardo L De Queiroz and Philip A Chou. 2017. Motion-compensated compression of dynamic voxelized point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 26, 8 (2017), 3886–3895.
[6]
Xianfeng David Gu, Feng Luo, Jian Sun, and Tianqi Wu. 2018. A discrete uniformization theorem for polyhedral surfaces. Journal of Differential Geometry 109, 2 (2018), 223–256.
[7]
Xianfeng David Gu and Shing-Tung Yau. 2008. Computational conformal geometry. Vol. 1. International Press Somerville, MA.
[8]
LUO Guo-liang, WANG He, ZHAO Xin, CAO Yi-qin, HUANG Xiao-sheng, WU Chang-xing, and XIAN Chu-hua. 2021. Research on the structured 3D animation and the compression. Journal of Graphics 42, 2 (2021), 182.
[9]
Behrend Heeren, Martin Rumpf, Max Wardetzky, and Benedikt Wirth. 2012. Time-discrete geodesics in the space of shells. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 31. Wiley Online Library, 1755–1764.
[10]
Jin Huang, Yiying Tong, Kun Zhou, Hujun Bao, and Mathieu Desbrun. 2010. Interactive shape interpolation through controllable dynamic deformation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 7(2010), 983–992.
[11]
Zachi Karni and Craig Gotsman. 2000. Spectral compression of mesh geometry. In Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 279–286.
[12]
Andrei Khodakovsky, Peter Schröder, and Wim Sweldens. 2000. Progressive geometry compression. In Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 271–278.
[13]
Ho Lee, Guillaume Lavoué, and Florent Dupont. 2012. Rate-distortion optimization for progressive compression of 3D mesh with color attributes. The Visual Computer 28, 2 (2012), 137–153.
[14]
Guiqing Li, Liang Yang, Shihao Wu, Wenshuang Tan, Xinyu Chen, and Chuhua Xian. 2013. Planar shape interpolation using relative velocity fields. Computers & graphics 37, 5 (2013), 364–375.
[15]
Yaron Lipman, Olga Sorkine, David Levin, and Daniel Cohen-Or. 2005. Linear rotation-invariant coordinates for meshes. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 24, 3 (2005), 479–487.
[16]
Adrien Maglo, Guillaume Lavoué, Florent Dupont, and Céline Hudelot. 2015. 3d mesh compression: Survey, comparisons, and emerging trends. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 47, 3 (2015), 1–41.
[17]
Stefano Marras, Thomas J Cashman, and Kai Hormann. 2013. Efficient interpolation of articulated shapes using mixed shape spaces. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 32. Wiley Online Library, 258–270.
[18]
Sebastian Martin, Bernhard Thomaszewski, Eitan Grinspun, and Markus Gross. 2011. Example-based elastic materials. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 papers. 1–8.
[19]
Ruwen Schnabel and Reinhard Klein. 2006. Octree-based Point-Cloud Compression. In Symposium on Point-Based Graphics, Mario Botsch, Baoquan Chen, Mark Pauly, and Matthias Zwicker (Eds.). The Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/SPBG/SPBG06/111-120
[20]
Robert W Sumner, Matthias Zwicker, Craig Gotsman, and Jovan Popović. 2005. Mesh-based inverse kinematics. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 24, 3 (2005), 488–495.
[21]
Dong Tian, Hideaki Ochimizu, Chen Feng, Robert Cohen, and Anthony Vetro. 2017. Geometric distortion metrics for point cloud compression. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 3460–3464.
[22]
Greg Turk and James F O’brien. 2005. Shape transformation using variational implicit functions. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Courses. 13–es.
[23]
Xiaofan Wei, Huibin Li, and Xianfeng David Gu. 2017. Three Dimensional Face Recognition via Surface Harmonic Mapping and Deep Learning. In Chinese Conference on Biometric Recognition. Springer, 66–76.
[24]
Brian Whited, Gioacchino Noris, Maryann Simmons, Robert W Sumner, Markus Gross, and Jarek Rossignac. 2010. Betweenit: An interactive tool for tight inbetweening. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 29. Wiley Online Library, 605–614.
[25]
Tim Winkler, Jens Drieseberg, Marc Alexa, and Kai Hormann. 2010. Multi-scale geometry interpolation. In Computer graphics forum, Vol. 29. Wiley Online Library, 309–318.
[26]
Dong Xu, Hongxin Zhang, Qing Wang, and Hujun Bao. 2006. Poisson shape interpolation. Graphical models 68, 3 (2006), 268–281.
[27]
Bailin Yang, Luhong Zhang, Frederick WB Li, Xiaoheng Jiang, Zhigang Deng, Meng Wang, and Mingliang Xu. 2019. Motion-aware compression and transmission of mesh animation sequences. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 10, 3(2019), 1–21.
[28]
Huaiping Yang and Bert Jüttler. 2007. 3D shape metamorphosis based on T-spline level sets. The Visual Computer 23, 12 (2007), 1015–1025.
[29]
Zhibang Zhang, Guiqing Li, Huina Lu, Yaobin Ouyang, Mengxiao Yin, and Chuhua Xian. 2015. Fast as-isometric-as-possible shape interpolation. Computers & Graphics 46(2015), 244–256.

Index Terms

  1. Efficient Parallel Computation Of 3D Model Deformation Based On Conformal Mapping
              Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Information & Contributors

              Information

              Published In

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              CSSE '22: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering
              October 2022
              753 pages
              ISBN:9781450397780
              DOI:10.1145/3569966
              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              Published: 20 December 2022

              Permissions

              Request permissions for this article.

              Check for updates

              Author Tags

              1. Conformal Mapping
              2. Deformation
              3. Parallel Computing
              4. Regular Structure

              Qualifiers

              • Research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Funding Sources

              Conference

              CSSE 2022

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate 33 of 74 submissions, 45%

              Contributors

              Other Metrics

              Bibliometrics & Citations

              Bibliometrics

              Article Metrics

              • 0
                Total Citations
              • 25
                Total Downloads
              • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
              Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

              Other Metrics

              Citations

              View Options

              Login options

              View options

              PDF

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader

              HTML Format

              View this article in HTML Format.

              HTML Format

              Figures

              Tables

              Media

              Share

              Share

              Share this Publication link

              Share on social media