skip to main content
10.1145/3569966.3570076acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improved White Matter Tract Segmentation for Unannotated Dataset

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 December 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

White matter (WM) tract segmentation is beneficial to brain research, which provides a valuable tool for analyzing brain development and disease. The introduction of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has greatly improved the accuracy of WM tract segmentation. However, the training of CNNs usually requires extensive manual annotations of WM tracts, which are often difficult to obtain in practical applications. Therefore, in this study, we explore two methods to realize CNN-based WM tract segmentation when there are no manual annotations of WM tracts for the target dataset and improve the segmentation accuracy. The first method generates registration-based pseudo labels for the target dataset to train the WM tract segmentation network. Specifically, we register images of the publicly available annotated dataset to images of the unlabeled target dataset and improve the binarization strategy by taking advantage of the characteristics of registration and WM tracts to generate the soft labels of WM tracts for target dataset. Moreover, we propose the other method to construct loss weighted matrix for network training using the registration information, which reduces the impact of registration error and further improves the segmentation performance. We evaluated the proposed methods with two dMRI datasets. The results show that the proposed methods are effective in improving the segmentation performance of WM tracts when the manual annotations are unavailable.

References

  1. Michel Thiebaut De Schotten, Alberto Bizzi, Flavio Dell’Acqua, Matthew Allin, Muriel Walshe, Robin Murray, Steven C Williams, Declan GM Murphy, Marco Catani, 2011. Atlasing location, asymmetry and inter-subject variability of white matter tracts in the human brain with MR diffusion tractography. NeuroImage 54, 1 (2011), 49–59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Eleftherios Garyfallidis, Marc-Alexandre Côté, Francois Rheault, Jasmeen Sidhu, Janice Hau, Laurent Petit, David Fortin, Stephen Cunanne, and Maxime Descoteaux. 2018. Recognition of white matter bundles using local and global streamline-based registration and clustering. NeuroImage 170(2018), 283–295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. James C Gee, Hui Zhang, Abraham Dubb, Brian B Avants, Paul A Yushkevich, and Jeffrey T Duda. 2006. Anatomy-based visualizations of diffusion tensor images of brain white matter. In Visualization and Processing of Tensor Fields. Springer, 155–163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Miguel Guevara, Claudio Román, Josselin Houenou, Delphine Duclap, Cyril Poupon, Jean François Mangin, and Pamela Guevara. 2017. Reproducibility of superficial white matter tracts using diffusion-weighted imaging tractography. NeuroImage 147(2017), 703–725.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Gordon J Harris, Patrick E Barta, Luon W Peng, Seong Lee, Paul D Brettschneider, Amish Shah, Jeffery D Henderer, Thomas E Schlaepfer, and Godfrey D Pearlson. 1994. MR volume segmentation of gray matter and white matter using manual thresholding: dependence on image brightness.American Journal of Neuroradiology 15, 2 (1994), 225–230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fraser Henderson, Kalil G Abdullah, Ragini Verma, and Steven Brem. 2020. Tractography and the connectome in neurosurgical treatment of gliomas: the premise, the progress, and the potential. Neurosurgical Focus 48, 2 (2020), E6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980(2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bo Li, Marius De Groot, Rebecca ME Steketee, Rozanna Meijboom, Marion Smits, Meike W Vernooij, M Arfan Ikram, Jiren Liu, Wiro J Niessen, and Esther E Bron. 2020. Neuro4Neuro: A neural network approach for neural tract segmentation using large-scale population-based diffusion imaging. NeuroImage 218(2020), 116993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Lauren J O’Donnell and Ofer Pasternak. 2015. Does diffusion MRI tell us anything about the white matter? An overview of methods and pitfalls. Schizophrenia Research 161, 1 (2015), 133–141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, 2019. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. 2015. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 234–241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. David C Van Essen, Stephen M Smith, Deanna M Barch, Timothy EJ Behrens, Essa Yacoub, Kamil Ugurbil, Wu-Minn HCP Consortium, 2013. The WU-Minn human connectome project: an overview. NeuroImage 80(2013), 62–79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jakob Wasserthal, Peter Neher, and Klaus H Maier-Hein. 2018. TractSeg-Fast and accurate white matter tract segmentation. NeuroImage 183(2018), 239–253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jakob Wasserthal, Peter F Neher, Dusan Hirjak, and Klaus H Maier-Hein. 2019. Combined tract segmentation and orientation mapping for bundle-specific tractography. Medical Image Analysis 58 (2019), 101559.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Ye Wu, Yoonmi Hong, Sahar Ahmad, Weili Lin, Dinggang Shen, Pew-Thian Yap, UNC/UMN Baby Connectome Project Consortium, 2020. Tract dictionary learning for fast and robust recognition of fiber bundles. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 251–259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Chuyang Ye, Zhen Yang, Sarah H Ying, and Jerry L Prince. 2015. Segmentation of the cerebellar peduncles using a random forest classifier and a multi-object geometric deformable model: application to spinocerebellar ataxia type 6. Neuroinformatics 13, 3 (2015), 367–381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jason D Yeatman, Robert F Dougherty, Elena Rykhlevskaia, Anthony J Sherbondy, Gayle K Deutsch, Brian A Wandell, and Michal Ben-Shachar. 2011. Anatomical properties of the arcuate fasciculus predict phonological and reading skills in children. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23, 11 (2011), 3304–3317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Fan Zhang, Suheyla Cetin Karayumak, Nico Hoffmann, Yogesh Rathi, Alexandra J Golby, and Lauren J O’Donnell. 2020. Deep white matter analysis (DeepWMA): Fast and consistent tractography segmentation. Medical Image Analysis 65 (2020), 101761.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Improved White Matter Tract Segmentation for Unannotated Dataset

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            CSSE '22: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering
            October 2022
            753 pages
            ISBN:9781450397780
            DOI:10.1145/3569966

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 December 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate33of74submissions,45%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format