skip to main content
10.1145/3570236.3570292acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiciipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Quality Analysis of Urban Economic Growth Based on TOPSIS Algorithm

Published:27 January 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

At present, the research on the quality of economic growth lacks rigorous measurement methods. In this paper, the index system of economic growth quality is obtained through data comparison, entropy weight method and TOPSIS optimal algorithm. This system is used to comprehensively evaluate the quality of economic growth. The data analysis shows that there are problems such as unstable economic growth, uneven distribution of welfare and unreasonable economic structure in Wuhan's economic growth process. In response to the above problems, this paper puts forward suggestions to shorten the poverty gap, accelerate the transformation of industrial structure, improve product supply, and increase investment in education and science and technology.

References

  1. Magazzino C , Mele M , Schneider N . A D2C Algorithm on the Natural Gas Consumption and Economic Growth: Challenges faced by Germany and Japan[J]. Energy, 2020, 219(8):119586.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Thidathip Haanchumpol and Prapaisri Sudasna-na-Ayudthya and Chansiri Singhtaun. Modern multivariate control chart using spatial signed rank for non-normal process[J]. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 2020, 23(4) : 859-869.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Monares P , Liu J H , Santibanez R , Accessing the Role of Trust Profiles for the Economic Growth of Societies: A Stochastic Rule-Based Simulation Using the Prisoner's Dilemma Game[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2020, 7(4):849-857.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Lucia Alessi and Matteo Barigozzi and Marco Capasso. Improved penalization for determining the number of factors in approximate factor models[J]. Statistics and Probability Letters, 2010, 80(23) : 1806-1813.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Francis X. Diebold and Canlin Li and Vivian Z. Yue. Global yield curve dynamics and interactions: A dynamic Nelson–Siegel approach[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2008, 146(2) : 351-363.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jushan Bai and Peng Wang. Econometric Analysis of Large Factor Models[J]. Annual Review of Economics, 2016, 8(1) : 53-80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Matei Demetrescu and Sinem Hacıoğlu Hoke. Predictive regressions under asymmetric loss: Factor augmentation and model selection[J]. International Journal of Forecasting, 2019, 35(1) : 80-99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Irma Hindrayanto and Siem Jan Koopman and Jasper de Winter. Forecasting and nowcasting economic growth in the euro area using factor models[J]. International Journal of Forecasting, 2016, 32(4) : 1284-1305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Matteo Barigozzi and Haeran Cho and Piotr Fryzlewicz. Simultaneous multiple change-point and factor analysis for high-dimensional time series[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2018, 206(1) : 187-225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Catherine Doz and Domenico Giannone and Lucrezia Reichlin. A two-step estimator for large approximate dynamic factor models based on Kalman filtering[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2011, 164(1) : 188-205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Guenter W. Beck and Kirstin Hubrich and Massimiliano Marcellino. On the Importance of Sectoral and Regional Shocks for Price‐Setting[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2016, 31(7) : 1234-1253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Lucia Alessi and Matteo Barigozzi and Marco Capasso. Improved penalization for determining the number of factors in approximate factor models[J]. Statistics and Probability Letters, 2010, 80(23) : 1806-1813.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Valentina Corradi and Norman R. Swanson. The effect of data transformation on common cycle, cointegration, and unit root tests: Monte Carlo results and a simple test[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2005, 132(1) : 195-229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Serfling R. J.. Moment Inequalities for the Maximum Cumulative Sum[J]. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1970, 41(4) : 1227-1234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Christine De Mol and Domenico Giannone and Lucrezia Reichlin. Forecasting using a large number of predictors: Is Bayesian shrinkage a valid alternative to principal components?[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2008, 146(2) : 318-328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Guan, B., Yue, X., Luan, Y., Zheng, Y. Preparation of Graphene / Manganese Dioxide Supercapacitor Electrode Sheet (2021) 2021 IEEE International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering and Computer Applications, AEECA 2021, pp. 329-332. DOI: 10.1109/AEECA52519.2021.9574434Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Min, C., Yinghui, X., Xiaoguang, Y., Hongmei, Y., Comite, U. Innovation of Practical Teaching Mode of Marketing Major-Market Research and Forecast under the Background of Big Data (2021) ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 49-52. DOI: 10.1145/3480571.3480579Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ibrahimov, V.R., Mehdiyeva, G.Y.U., Yue, X.-G., Kaabar, M.K.A., Noeiaghdam, S., Juraev, D.A. Novel symmetric numerical methods for solving symmetric mathematical problems (2021) International Journal of Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing, 15, pp. 1545-1557. DOI: 10.46300/9106.2021.15.167Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Minh Ha, N.M., Tuan Anh, P., Yue, X.-G., Hoang Phi Nam, N. The impact of tax avoidance on the value of listed firms in Vietnam (2021) Cogent Business and Management, 8 (1), art. no. 1930870. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2021.1930870Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pan, K., Yue, X.-G. Multidimensional effect of covid-19 on the economy: evidence from survey data (2021) Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2021.1903333Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICIIP '22: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing
    September 2022
    367 pages
    ISBN:9781450396714
    DOI:10.1145/3570236

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 January 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate87of367submissions,24%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format