ABSTRACT
The discovery of cancer subtypes has helped researchers gain deeper insights into the study of oncology heterogeneity. However, since cancer complexity exists in various omics levels, extracting and adaptive combining complementary information across multi-omics are still challenges in cancer subtype prediction approaches.
Based on the subspace learning of multi view clustering, we propose a new multi group cancer subtype recognition model based on anchor enhancement. Firstly, we generate anchors for each view's local similarity graph structure to enhance the connectivity between samples. Secondly, the graph convolution module is used to learn the consistency similarity features and specific features of patient samples in each view. Finally, the corresponding cancer subtype clustering results can be calculated according to the self-expressive coefficient matrix of the consistency similarity features obtained in the previous step.
- Hanahan D. Hallmarks of Cancer: New Dimensions. Cancer Discov. 2022, 12 (1): 31-46.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yang H, Chen R, Li D, Wang Z. Subtype-GAN: a deep learning approach for integrative cancer subtyping of multi-omics data. Bioinformatics. 2021.Google Scholar
- Mo QX, Shen RL, Guo C, Vannucci M, Chan KS, Hilsenbeck SG. A fully Bayesian latent variable model for integrative clustering analysis of multi-type omics data. Biostatistics. 2018, 19 (1): 71-86.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yang B, Xin TT, Pang SM, Wang M, Wang YJ. Deep Subspace Mutual Learning for cancer subtypes prediction. Bioinformatics. 2021, 37 (21): 3715-3722.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wang B, Mezlini AM, Demir F, Similarity network fusion for aggregating data types on a genomic scale. Nat Methods. 2014, 11 (3): 333-337.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Briere G, Darbo E, Thebault P, Uricaru R. Consensus clustering applied to multi-omics disease subtyping. BMC Bioinformatics. 2021, 22 (1): 361.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Network CGAR. Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (vol 489, pg 519, 2012). Nature. 2012, 491 (7423): 288-288.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bache K, Lichman M. UCI Machine Learning Repository. 2013.Google Scholar
- Xia W, Wang S, Yang M, Gao Q, Han J, Gao X. Multi-view graph embedding clustering network: Joint self-supervision and block diagonal representation. Neural Netw. 2022, 145: 1-9.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chou CY, Chang EJ, Li HT, Wu AY. Low-Complexity Privacy-Preserving Compressive Analysis Using Subspace-Based Dictionary for ECG Telemonitoring System. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2018, 12 (4): 801-811.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chang S, Hu J, Li TR, Wang H, Peng B. Multi-view clustering via deep concept factorization. Knowl-Based Syst. 2021, 217.Google Scholar
- Sun, Mengjing, "Scalable multi-view subspace clustering with unified anchors." Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 2021.Google Scholar
- Li, Xuelong, "Multiview clustering: A scalable and parameter-free bipartite graph fusion method." IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 44.1. 2020 :330-344.Google Scholar
- Lin YJ, Gou YBA, Liu ZT, Li BY, Lv JC, Peng X. COMPLETER: Incomplete Multi-view Clustering via Contrastive Prediction. Proc Cvpr Ieee. 2021, 11169-11178.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wang H, Yang Y, Liu B. GMC: Graph-Based Multi-View Clustering. Ieee T Knowl Data En. 2020, 32 (6): 1116-1129.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wang H, Zong LL, Liu B, Yang Y, Zhou W. Spectral Perturbation Meets Incomplete Multi-view Data. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2019, 3677-3683.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wen J, Zhang Z, Xu Y, Zhang B, Fei LK, Liu H. Unified Embedding Alignment with Missing Views Inferring for Incomplete Multi-View Clustering. Aaai Conf Artif Inte. 2019, 5393-5400.Google Scholar
- Hanzelmann S, Castelo R, Guinney J. GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-Seq data. Bmc Bioinformatics. 2013, 14.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- AEMVC: anchor enhanced multi-omics cancer subtype identification
Recommendations
DeepTpNet: A Deep Learning Approach to Identify Cancer Subtypes Based on Multi-omics Data
ICCAI '22: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computing and Artificial IntelligenceCancer is an extremely complex and lethal genetic disease. Cancer subtypes can be used to guide the early diagnosis, personalized treatment of cancer and improve the treatment effect. The rapid development of high-throughput sequencing technology has ...
Cancer subtype prediction from a pathway-level perspective by using a support vector machine based on integrated gene expression and protein network
Genes and PPIs were integrated for the intensity of the pathway link change in the neuroepithelial tumors progress.Fragments of pathways in different stages of disease were transformed into a sparse matrix.The SVM prediction accuracy was 67.64% for 3 ...
Bayesian tensor factorization-drive breast cancer subtyping by integrating multi-omics data
Graphical abstractDisplay Omitted
Highlights- A Bayesian tensor factorization-based framework was developed for cancer subtyping.
AbstractBreast cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease. Subtyping the disease and identifying the genomic features driving these subtypes are critical for precision oncology for breast cancer. This study focuses on developing a new ...
Comments