skip to main content
10.1145/3571600.3571631acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicvgipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Novel Statistical High Density Salt-and-Pepper Noise Removal Algorithm for Brain Magnetic Resonance Images

Published:12 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive technique that produces high quality images of the brain and is most suitable for analysis and diagnosis. However, these images can be soiled with noise during image acquisition or transmission. The paper is targeted at removing high density salt and pepper noise from such medical images using a denoising technique based on centroidal mean formulation. The presented method is tested on various noisy brain MRI images and the obtained results are promising even for images with high density corruptions, which is suggestive of the resiliency of the algorithm.

References

  1. Shaveta Arora, Madasu Hanmandlu, and Gaurav Gupta. 2020. Filtering impulse noise in medical images using information sets. Pattern Recognition Letters 139 (2020), 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Nishant Bindal and Bharat Garg. 2022. Novel three stage range sensitive filter for denoising high density salt and pepper noise. Multimedia Tools and Applications(2022), 1–16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S Esakkirajan, T Veerakumar, Adabala N Subramanyam, and CH PremChand. 2011. Removal of high density salt and pepper noise through modified decision based unsymmetric trimmed median filter. IEEE Signal processing letters 18, 5 (2011), 287–290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Mohamed Azmy Gad. 2022. Modified Non-Local Means Filter for Removing Salt and Pepper Noise from Images of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Menoufia Journal of Electronic Engineering Research 31, 1 (2022), 35–38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. R. C. Gonzalez and R. E. Woods. 2002. Digital Image Processing(2nd ed.). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hákon Gudbjartsson and Samuel Patz. 1995. The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magnetic resonance in medicine 34, 6 (1995), 910–914.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. J. Ko and Y. H. Lee. 1991. Center weighted median filters and their applications to image enhancement. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 38, 9 (1991), 984–993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hu Liang, Na Li, and Shengrong Zhao. 2021. Salt and pepper noise removal method based on a detail-aware filter. Symmetry 13, 3 (2021), 515.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Wei Liu and Weisi Lin. 2012. Additive white Gaussian noise level estimation in SVD domain for images. IEEE Transactions on Image processing 22, 3 (2012), 872–883.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ping Luo, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Zheng Chang, and Wang Liu. 2021. Research on Salt and Pepper Noise Removal Method Based on Adaptive Fuzzy Median Filter. In 2021 IEEE 5th Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC), Vol. 5. IEEE, 387–392.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. W. Luo. 2006. Efficient Removal of Impulse Noise from Digital Images. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 52, 2 (2006), 523–527.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Bjoern H Menze, Andras Jakab, Stefan Bauer, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Keyvan Farahani, Justin Kirby, Yuliya Burren, Nicole Porz, Johannes Slotboom, Roland Wiest, 2014. The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE transactions on medical imaging 34, 10 (2014), 1993–2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mon-ChauShie Shanq-JangRuan Mu-Hsien Hsieh, Fan-Chieh Cheng. 2013. Fast and efficient median filter for removing 1-99% levels of salt-and-pepper noise in images. Engineering ApplicationsofArtificialIntelligence 26(2013), 1333–1338.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mao-Hsiung Hung Qing-Qiang Chen and Fumin Zou. 2017. Effective and adaptive algorithm for pepper-and-salt noise removal. IET Image Processing 11, 9 (2017), 709–716.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Nikhil Sharma, Prateek Jeet Singh Sohi, Bharat Garg, and KV Arya. 2021. A novel multilayer decision based iterative filter for removal of salt and pepper noise. Multimedia Tools and Applications 80, 17 (2021), 26531–26545.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. C Jaspin Jeba Sheela and G Suganthi. 2020. An efficient denoising of impulse noise from MRI using adaptive switching modified decision based unsymmetric trimmed median filter. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 55 (2020), 101657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. C Jaspin Jeba Sheela and G Suganthi. 2020. An efficient denoising of impulse noise from MRI using adaptive switching modified decision based unsymmetric trimmed median filter. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 55 (2020), 101657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. K. S. Srinivasan and D. Ebenezer. 2007. A New Fast and Efficient Decision-Based Algorithm for Removal of High-Density Impulse Noises. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 14, 3 (2007), 189–192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Paul Suetens. 2017. Fundamentals of medical imaging. Cambridge university press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. D Summers. 2003. Harvard Whole Brain Atlas: www. med. harvard. edu/AANLIB/home. html. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 74, 3(2003), 288–288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. T. Sun and Y. Neuvo. 1994. Detail-preserving median based filters in image processing. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 15 (1994), 341–347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. K. K. Vin Toh and Nor A. Mat Isa. 2010. Noise Adaptive Fuzzy Switching Median Filter for Salt-and-Pepper Noise Reduction. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 17, 3 (2010), 281–284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. L. Gokrem U. Erkan and S. Enginoglu. 2018. Different applied median filter in salt and pepper noise. Computers and Electrical Engineering(2018), 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. V. Chaurasia V. Gupta and M. Shandilya. 2015. Random-valued impulse noise removal using adaptive dual threshold median filter. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 26 (2015), 296–304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. X. Song Y. Wang, J. Wang and L. Han. 2016. An Efficient Adaptive Fuzzy Switching Weighted Mean Filter for Salt-and-Pepper Noise Removal. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 23, 11 (2016), 1582–1586.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Song Xiao Jiangyun Wang Yi Wang, Liang Hanand Xiang Zhai. 2017. A novel statistical approach to remove salt-and-pepper noise. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation (2017), 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Melih Yildirim. 2021. Analog circuit implementation based on median filter for salt and pepper noise reduction in image. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing 107, 1(2021), 195–202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. P. Zhang and F. Li. 2014. A New Adaptive Weighted Mean Filter for Removing Salt-and-Pepper Noise. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 21, 10 (2014), 1280–1283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Novel Statistical High Density Salt-and-Pepper Noise Removal Algorithm for Brain Magnetic Resonance Images

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICVGIP '22: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing
            December 2022
            506 pages
            ISBN:9781450398220
            DOI:10.1145/3571600

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 12 May 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate95of286submissions,33%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format