Muhammad Bambang Hidayanto
ABSTRACT
The digital era, which is a jargon in welcoming the technological developments has given birth to a new form of learning that eliminates the requirement of physical presence of teachers and students within the same place and time, or it can be known as Online Learning. The possibility for the institution of education in supporting their business into a new level of services in supporting their ecosystem have met the challenges of the readiness in doing the transformation from the traditional learning within the context of human resources, technology, and learning concept into a syllabus with the purpose of achieving the same level or output. When the Corona Virus Diseases 19 (COVID 19) made drastic changes in every aspect that afterwards became a global pandemic, the implementation of online learning would ensure the survivability of the educational institution in keeping their business. Telkom University, as one of private university in Indonesia, with the student body almost reaches 30.000, uses Learning Management System (LMS) in enabling the learning activities as the primary solution but has a problem in ensuring no cheating activities during the examination. As the common approach in ensuring the integrity of online examination through LMS with the creation of question bank and randomize the question is seen as not efficient, the institution also tries to monitor and control with the implementation of video conference-based application like ZOOM and Safe Exam Browser (SEB), but raises another problem in cost, compatibility issues, and motivation issues. Proctoring has become another approach that is recently has continue evolving with the involvement from Artificial Intelligence (AI) in doing the facial recognition. This research will develop the proctoring tools that can be integrated with the LMS used in Telkom University as the strategy in preventing misconduct behavior that led to academic cheating in online examination.
- Dinis Sousa, R. 2020. Digitalization as a New Direction in Education Sphere. E3S Web of Conferences. 159, 09014. https://doi.org/10.1051/E3SCONF/202015909014.Google Scholar
- García-Morales, V.J. 2021. The Transformation of Higher Education After the COVID Disruption: Emerging Challenges in an Online Learning Scenario. Frontiers in Psychology. 12, 196. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2021.616059/BIBTEX. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Singh, V., Thurman, A. 2019. How Many Ways Can We Define Online Learning? A Systematic Literature Review of Definitions of Online Learning (1988-2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082. 33, 4, 289–306 Google Scholar
- Roddy, C. 2017. Applying Best Practice Online Learning, Teaching, and Support to Intensive Online Environments: An Integrative Review. Frontiers in Education. 2, 59. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEDUC.2017.00059/BIBTEX. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alturki, U., Aldraiweesh, A. 2021. Application of Learning Management System (LMS) during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Sustainable Acceptance Model of the Expansion Technology Approach. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 10991. 13, 19, 10991.Google Scholar
- Chua, S.S. 2019. Online Examination System with Cheating Prevention Using Question Bank Randomization and Tab Locking. Proceedings of 2019 4th International Conference on Information Technology: Encompassing Intelligent Technology and Innovation Towards the New Era of Human Life, InCIT 2019. 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1109/INCIT.2019.8912065.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lee, J. 2021. Using technologies to prevent cheating in remote assessments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Dental Education. 85, S1, 1015–1017. https://doi.org/10.1002/JDD.12350. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Selwyn, N. 2021. A necessary evil? The rise of online exam proctoring in Australian universities. Media International Australia. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211005862. Google Scholar
- Nigam, A. 2021. A Systematic Review on AI-based Proctoring Systems: Past, Present and Future. Education and Information Technologies. 26, 5, 6421–6445. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-021-10597-X/TABLES/4. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beldarrain, Y. 2006. Distance Education Trends: Integrating New Technologies to Foster Student. Distance Education. 27, 2, 139–153. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cojocariu, V.-M. 2014. SWOT Analysis of E-learning Educational Services from the Perspective of their Beneficiaries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 116, 1999–2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.01.510. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mahnegar, F. 2012. Learning management system. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(12), 144-150.Google Scholar
- Arnold, Ivo. 2016. Cheating at online formative tests: Does it pay off?. The Internet and Higher Education. 29. 10. 1016/j.iheduc.2016.02.001. Google Scholar
- Harmon, O.R. 2010. Assessment Design and Cheating Risk in Online Instruction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(3).Google Scholar
- Hussein, M.J. 2020. An Evaluation of Online Proctoring Tools. Open Praxis. 12, 4, 509. https://doi.org/10.5944/OPENPRAXIS.12.4.1113. Google ScholarCross Ref
- McNabb, L. 2009. Communities of Integrity in Online Courses: Faculty Member Beliefs and Strategies. Presented at the. Google Scholar
- Alessio, H.M. 2017. Examining the effect of proctoring on online test scores. Online Learning Journal. 21, 1. https://doi.org/10.24059/OLJ.V21I1.885. Google Scholar
- Caveon, D.F. 2013. Online Proctoring Systems Compared.Google Scholar
- Brown, V. 2018. Evaluating Technology to Prevent Academic Integrity Violations in Online. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 21, 1. Google Scholar
- Ganidisastra, A. H. S. 2021. An Incremental Training on Deep Learning Face Recognition for M-Learning Online Exam Proctoring. 2021 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Wireless and Mobile (APWiMob). doi:10.1109/apwimob51111.2021.9435232. Google Scholar
- Sukmandhani, A. 2019. Face Recognition Method for Online Exams. 175-179. 10.1109/ICIMTech.2019.8843831Google Scholar
- Lubis, M. 2018. Enterprise application integration for high school students using blended learning system. MATEC Web of Conferences. 218. 04016. 10.1051/matecconf/201821804016Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lubis, M. 2022. Satisfaction Measurement in the Blended Learning System of the University: The Literacy Mediated-Discourses (LM-D) Framework. Sustainability 2022, Vol. 14, Page 12929. 14, 19, 12929. 10.3390/su141912929Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Designing Web Based Proctoring System for Online Examination (SPIRIT 1.0) in Telkom University
Recommendations
Online Learning Platform Analysis During COVID- 19 Pandemic in Indonesia
AbstractCovid-19 forces Indonesia's education institutions to operate learning online. The continuity of online learning is influenced by several factors, such as personal space, environment, and learning system. Out of all categories, Learning Management ...
How to organize continuing studies at an academic institution?
TELE-INFO'09: Proceedings of the 8th Wseas international conference on Telecommunications and informaticsThe aim of this paper is to explore possibilities of using resources of institutions of higher education to support processes of life-long learning of its students, graduates and academic teachers. In the first part we will analyze needs and ...
The Development of Blended-Learning Teaching Portfolio Course Using TBL Approach
This article was written to develop a teaching portfolio that helps lecturers maximize the benefits of blended learning, a combination of in-person and online learning, through the use of Team-Based Learning TBL teaching and learning approach. Studies ...
Comments