skip to main content
10.1145/3571884.3597133acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Understanding and Answering Incomplete Questions

Published:19 July 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Voice assistants interrupt people when they pause mid-question, a frustrating interaction that requires the full repetition of the entire question again. This impacts all users, but particularly people with cognitive impairments. In human-human conversation, these situations are recovered naturally as people understand the words that were uttered. In this paper we build answer pipelines which parse incomplete questions and repair them following human recovery strategies. We evaluated these pipelines on our new corpus, SLUICE. It contains 21,000 interrupted questions, from LC-QuAD 2.0 and QALD-9-plus, paired with their underspecified SPARQL queries. Compared to a system that is given the full question, our best partial understanding pipeline answered only 0.77% fewer questions. Results show that our pipeline correctly identifies what information is required to provide an answer but is not yet provided by the incomplete question. It also accurately identifies where that missing information belongs in the semantic structure of the question.

References

  1. Angus Addlesee. 2019. Constructing More Advanced SPARQL Queries. https://medium.com/wallscope/constructing-more-advanced-sparql-queries-72d5ade1eedc [Online; accessed 19-May-2022].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Angus Addlesee. 2023. Voice Assistant Accessibility. In Proceedings of The 13th International Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems (IWSDS) 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Angus Addlesee and Arash Eshghi. 2021. Incremental Graph-Based Semantics and Reasoning for Conversational AI. In Proceedings of the Reasoning and Interaction Conference (ReInAct 2021). 1–7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Oshin Agarwal, Heming Ge, Siamak Shakeri, and Rami Al-Rfou. 2020. Knowledge graph based synthetic corpus generation for knowledge-enhanced language model pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.12688 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sören Auer, Christian Bizer, Georgi Kobilarov, Jens Lehmann, Richard Cyganiak, and Zachary Ives. 2007. Dbpedia: A nucleus for a web of open data. In The semantic web. Springer, 722–735.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Michael Azmy, Peng Shi, Jimmy Lin, and Ihab Ilyas. 2018. Farewell Freebase: Migrating the SimpleQuestions Dataset to DBpedia. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, 2093–2103. https://aclanthology.org/C18-1178Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Laura Banarescu, Claire Bonial, Shu Cai, Madalina Georgescu, Kira Griffitt, Ulf Hermjakob, Kevin Knight, Philipp Koehn, Martha Palmer, and Nathan Schneider. 2012. Abstract meaning representation (amr) 1.0 specification. In Parsing on Freebase from Question-Answer Pairs. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Seattle: ACL. 1533–1544.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Laura Banarescu, Claire Bonial, Shu Cai, Madalina Georgescu, Kira Griffitt, Ulf Hermjakob, Kevin Knight, Philipp Koehn, Martha Palmer, and Nathan Schneider. 2013. Abstract meaning representation for sembanking. In Proceedings of the 7th linguistic annotation workshop and interoperability with discourse. 178–186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Debayan Banerjee, Pranav Ajit Nair, Jivat Neet Kaur, Ricardo Usbeck, and Chris Biemann. 2022. Modern Baselines for SPARQL Semantic Parsing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.12793 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Brahim Batouche, Claire Gardent, Anne Monceaux, and France Blagnac. 2014. Parsing text into RDF graphs. In Proceedings of the XXXI Congress of the Spanish Society for the Processing of Natural Language.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bradley R Bebee, Daniel Choi, Ankit Gupta, Andi Gutmans, Ankesh Khandelwal, Yigit Kiran, Sainath Mallidi, Bruce McGaughy, Mike Personick, Karthik Rajan, 2018. Amazon Neptune: Graph Data Management in the Cloud.. In International Semantic Web Conference (P&D/Industry/BlueSky).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jonathan Berant, Andrew Chou, Roy Frostig, and Percy Liang. 2013. Semantic parsing on freebase from question-answer pairs. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 1533–1544.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kurt Bollacker, Colin Evans, Praveen Paritosh, Tim Sturge, and Jamie Taylor. 2008. Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. 1247–1250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Veronica Boschi, Eleonora Catricala, Monica Consonni, Cristiano Chesi, Andrea Moro, and Stefano F Cappa. 2017. Connected speech in neurodegenerative language disorders: a review. Frontiers in psychology 8 (2017), 269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lois Bowers. 2019. Amazon announces HIPAA-compliant skills for Alexa, with senior living parent companies in the mix. https://www.mcknightsseniorliving.com/home/news/amazon-announces-hipaa-compliant-skills-for-alexa-with-senior-living-parent-companies-in-the-mix/ McKnights Senior Living. [Online; accessed 17-May-2022].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Paul T Brady. 1968. A statistical analysis of on-off patterns in 16 conversations. Bell System Technical Journal 47, 1 (1968), 73–91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Shulin Cao, Jiaxin Shi, Liangming Pan, Lunyiu Nie, Yutong Xiang, Lei Hou, Juanzi Li, Bin He, and Hanwang Zhang. 2022. KQA Pro: A Dataset with Explicit Compositional Programs for Complex Question Answering over Knowledge Base. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 6101–6119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Haonan Chen, Hao Tan, Alan Kuntz, Mohit Bansal, and Ron Alterovitz. 2020. Enabling robots to understand incomplete natural language instructions using commonsense reasoning. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 1963–1969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Christian Chiarcos, Thierry Declerck, and John P Mccrae. 2013. Linguistic Linked Open Data (LLOD) Introduction and Overview. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jordan Clive, Kris Cao, and Marek Rei. 2021. Control Prefixes for Text Generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.08329 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Bernard Croisile, Bernadette Ska, Marie-Josee Brabant, Annick Duchene, Yves Lepage, Gilbert Aimard, and Marc Trillet. 1996. Comparative study of oral and written picture description in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and language 53, 1 (1996), 1–19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. DailyCaring. 2020. Amazon Echo Alexa Helps Seniors with Dementia. https://dailycaring.com/amazon-echo-for-dementia-technology-for-seniors/ [Online; accessed 17-May-2022].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Marco Damonte and Shay Cohen. 2022. Abstract Meaning Representation 2.0-Four Translations. (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Marco Damonte, Shay B Cohen, and Giorgio Satta. 2016. An incremental parser for abstract meaning representation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.06111 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. DBSC. 2020. M4D Radio. https://www.amazon.co.uk/DBSC-LTD-M4D-Radio/dp/B089GQBY5R [Online; accessed 17-May-2022].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sahas Dendukuri, Pooja Chitkara, Joel Ruben Antony Moniz, Xiao Yang, Manos Tsagkias, and Stephen Pulman. 2021. Using Pause Information for More Accurate Entity Recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.13222 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Daniel Diomedi and Aidan Hogan. 2021. Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs with Neural Machine Translation and Entity Linking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02865 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Andrew Drozdov, Jiawei Zhou, Radu Florian, Andrew McCallum, Tahira Naseem, Yoon Kim, and Ramon Fernandez Astudillo. 2022. Inducing and Using Alignments for Transition-based AMR Parsing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01464 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Mohnish Dubey, Debayan Banerjee, Abdelrahman Abdelkawi, and Jens Lehmann. 2019. Lc-quad 2.0: A large dataset for complex question answering over wikidata and dbpedia. In International semantic web conference. Springer, 69–78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jens Edlund and Mattias Heldner. 2005. Exploring prosody in interaction control. Phonetica 62, 2-4 (2005), 215–226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Fredo Erxleben, Michael Günther, Markus Krötzsch, Julian Mendez, and Denny Vrandečić. 2014. Introducing Wikidata to the linked data web. In International semantic web conference. Springer, 50–65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. DA Evseev and M Yu Arkhipov. 2020. Sparql query generation for complex question answering with bert and bilstm-based model. In Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies. 270–282.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Raquel Fernández, Jonathan Ginzburg, and Shalom Lappin. 2007. Classifying non-sentential utterances in dialogue: A machine learning approach. Computational Linguistics 33, 3 (2007), 397–427.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Gillian Fyfe. 2019. Amazon Echo. https://www.alzscot.org/amazon-echo Alzheimer Scotland. [Online; accessed 17-May-2022].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Claire Gardent, Anastasia Shimorina, Shashi Narayan, and Laura Perez-Beltrachini. 2017. The WebNLG challenge: Generating text from RDF data. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Natural Language Generation. 124–133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Jonathan Ginzburg and Ivan Sag. 2000. Interrogative investigations. Stanford: CSLI publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Yu Gu, Sue Kase, Michelle Vanni, Brian Sadler, Percy Liang, Xifeng Yan, and Yu Su. 2021. Beyond IID: three levels of generalization for question answering on knowledge bases. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 3477–3488.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Matthew Honnibal, Ines Montani, Sofie Van Landeghem, and Adriane Boyd. 2020. spaCy: Industrial-strength Natural Language Processing in Python, 2020. URL https://doi. org/10.5281/zenodo 1212303, 6 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Christine Howes, Ptarick GT Healey, Matthew Purver, and Arash Eshghi. 2012. Finishing each other’s... responding to incomplete contributions in dialogue. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vol. 34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Christine Howes, Matthew Purver, Patrick GT Healey, Gregory J Mills, and Eleni Gregoromichelaki. 2011. On incrementality in dialogue: Evidence from compound contributions. Dialogue & Discourse 2, 1 (2011), 279–311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Jiepu Jiang, Wei Jeng, and Daqing He. 2013. How do users respond to voice input errors? Lexical and phonetic query reformulation in voice search. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 143–152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Rachel Jiang. 2019. Introducing New Alexa Healthcare Skills. https://developer.amazon.com/blogs/alexa/post/ff33dbc7-6cf5-4db8-b203-99144a251a21/introducing-new-alexa-healthcare-skills Alexa Blogs. [Online; accessed 17-May-2022].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Patrick Kahardipraja, Brielen Madureira, and David Schlangen. 2021. Towards Incremental Transformers: An Empirical Analysis of Transformer Models for Incremental NLU. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07364 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Mihir Kale and Abhinav Rastogi. 2020. Text-to-text pre-training for data-to-text tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.10433 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Daniel Keysers, Nathanael Schärli, Nathan Scales, Hylke Buisman, Daniel Furrer, Sergii Kashubin, Nikola Momchev, Danila Sinopalnikov, Lukasz Stafiniak, Tibor Tihon, 2019. Measuring compositional generalization: A comprehensive method on realistic data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.09713 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Kevin Knight, Bianca Badarau, Laura Baranescu, Claire Bonial, Madalina Bardocz, Kira Griffitt, Ulf Hermjakob, Daniel Marcu, Martha Palmer, Tim O’Gorman, and Nathan Schneider. 2021. Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) Annotation Release 3.0. https://doi.org/11272.1/AB2/82CVJFGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Ora Lassila, Ralph R Swick, 1998. Resource description framework (RDF) model and syntax specification. W3C recommendation (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Jens Lehmann, Robert Isele, Max Jakob, Anja Jentzsch, Dimitris Kontokostas, Pablo N Mendes, Sebastian Hellmann, Mohamed Morsey, Patrick Van Kleef, Sören Auer, 2015. Dbpedia–a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from wikipedia. Semantic web 6, 2 (2015), 167–195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Brielen Madureira and David Schlangen. 2020. Incremental processing in the age of non-incremental encoders: An empirical assessment of bidirectional models for incremental NLU. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.05330 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Frank Manola, Eric Miller, Brian McBride, 2004. RDF primer. W3C recommendation 10, 1-107 (2004), 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Vinsen Marselino Andreas, Genta Indra Winata, and Ayu Purwarianti. 2022. A Comparative Study on Language Models for Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems. arXiv e-prints (2022), arXiv–2201.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. William Marslen-Wilson. 1973. Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature 244, 5417 (1973), 522–523.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Douglas McClusky. 2021. The Alexa Fund. https://www.battleagainstdementia.org/#: :text=The%20’Alexa%20Fund’%20has,living%20in%20their%20own%20homes. [Online; accessed 17-May-2022].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. John McCrae, Dennis Spohr, and Philipp Cimiano. 2011. Linking lexical resources and ontologies on the semantic web with lemon. In Extended Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 245–259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Peter Mika. 2015. On schema. org and why it matters for the web. IEEE Internet Computing 19, 4 (2015), 52–55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Mohamed Morsey, Jens Lehmann, Sören Auer, Claus Stadler, and Sebastian Hellmann. 2012. Dbpedia and the live extraction of structured data from wikipedia. Program (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Mikio Nakano, Yuka Nagano, Kotaro Funakoshi, Toshihiko Ito, Kenji Araki, Yuji Hasegawa, and Hiroshi Tsujino. 2007. Analysis of user reactions to turn-taking failures in spoken dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 8th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. 120–123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Yavor Nenov, Robert Piro, Boris Motik, Ian Horrocks, Zhe Wu, and Jay Banerjee. 2015. RDFox: A highly-scalable RDF store. In International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 3–20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Finn Nielsen. 2020. Lexemes in Wikidata: 2020 status. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Linked Data in Linguistics (LDL-2020). 82–86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Laura Panfili, Steve Duman, Andrew Nave, Katherine Phelps Ridgeway, Nathan Eversole, and Ruhi Sarikaya. 2021. Human-AI interactions through a Gricean lens. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 6, 1 (2021), 288–302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Thomas Pellissier Tanon, Denny Vrandečić, Sebastian Schaffert, Thomas Steiner, and Lydia Pintscher. 2016. From freebase to wikidata: The great migration. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on world wide web. 1419–1428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Aleksandr Perevalov, Dennis Diefenbach, Ricardo Usbeck, and Andreas Both. 2022. QALD-9-plus: A Multilingual Dataset for Question Answering over DBpedia and Wikidata Translated by Native Speakers. In 2022 IEEE 16th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC). IEEE. arxiv:2202.00120 [cs.CL]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Aleksandr Perevalov, Xi Yan, Liubov Kovriguina, Longquan Jiang, Andreas Both, and Ricardo Usbeck. 2022. Knowledge Graph Question Answering Leaderboard: A Community Resource to Prevent a Replication Crisis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08174 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Jorge Pérez, Marcelo Arenas, and Claudio Gutierrez. 2006. Semantics and Complexity of SPARQL. In International semantic web conference. Springer, 30–43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Jorge Pérez, Marcelo Arenas, and Claudio Gutierrez. 2009. Semantics and complexity of SPARQL. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS) 34, 3 (2009), 1–45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. PlaylistForLife. 2021. Testing Voice Activated Technology for Dementia. https://www.playlistforlife.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Testing-voice-activated-technology-for-dementia-report.pdf [Online; accessed 17-May-2022].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Massimo Poesio and Hannes Rieses. 2010. Completions, coordination, and alignment in dialogue. Dialogue & Discourse 1, 1 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Matthew Purver, Jonathan Ginzburg, and Patrick Healey. 2003. On the means for clarification in dialogue. In Current and new directions in discourse and dialogue. Springer, 235–255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J Liu. 2019. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.10683 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. 2016. Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05250 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. RiseIQ. 2018. Dementia Skill. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Rise-iq-Dementia-Skill/dp/B07DBDT196 [Online; accessed 17-May-2022].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Manuel Romero. 2021. T5 (base) fine-tuned on SQUAD for QG via AP. https://huggingface.co/mrm8488/t5-base-finetuned-question-generation-ap.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Subendhu Rongali, Luca Soldaini, Emilio Monti, and Wael Hamza. 2020. Don’t parse, generate! a sequence to sequence architecture for task-oriented semantic parsing. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 2962–2968.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Rishiraj Saha Roy and Avishek Anand. 2022. Complex Question Answering. In Question Answering for the Curated Web. Springer, 37–51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Seiji Sakakibara, Sachio Saiki, Masahide Nakamura, and Kiyoshi Yasuda. 2017. Generating personalized dialogue towards daily counseling system for home dementia care. In Digital Human Modeling. Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics, and Risk Management: Health and Safety: 8th International Conference, DHM 2017, Held as Part of HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9-14, 2017, Proceedings, Part II 8. Springer, 161–172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Barry Schwartz. 2014. Google To Close Freebase, Which Helped Feed Its Knowledge Graph. https://searchengineland.com/google-close-freebase-helped-feed-knowledge-graph-211103 [Online; accessed 19-May-2022].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Frank Seifart, Jan Strunk, Swintha Danielsen, Iren Hartmann, Brigitte Pakendorf, Søren Wichmann, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Nivja H de Jong, and Balthasar Bickel. 2018. Nouns slow down speech across structurally and culturally diverse languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 22 (2018), 5720–5725.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Gabriel Skantze. 2021. Turn-taking in conversational systems and human-robot interaction: a review. Computer Speech & Language 67 (2021), 101178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. Antoine Slegers, Renee-Pier Filiou, Maxime Montembeault, and Simona Maria Brambati. 2018. Connected speech features from picture description in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 65, 2 (2018), 519–542.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Yu Su, Huan Sun, Brian Sadler, Mudhakar Srivatsa, Izzeddin Gür, Zenghui Yan, and Xifeng Yan. 2016. On generating characteristic-rich question sets for qa evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 562–572.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Apple Support. 2022. Use accessibility features with Siri on iPhone. https://support.apple.com/en-gb/guide/iphone/iphaff1d606/ios [Online; accessed 14-April-2023].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Louis Ten Bosch, Nelleke Oostdijk, and Lou Boves. 2005. On temporal aspects of turn taking in conversational dialogues. Speech Communication 47, 1-2 (2005), 80–86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Trung Tran and Dang Tuan Nguyen. 2020. Webnlg 2020 challenge: Semantic template mining for generating references from rdf. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Natural Language Generation from the Semantic Web (WebNLG+). 177–185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Oriol Vinyals, Meire Fortunato, and Navdeep Jaitly. 2015. Pointer networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 28 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Denny Vrandečić. 2012. Wikidata: A new platform for collaborative data collection. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on world wide web. 1063–1064.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Denny Vrandečić and Markus Krötzsch. 2014. Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM 57, 10 (2014), 78–85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, Rémi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, 2019. Huggingface’s transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03771 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Xuchen Yao and Benjamin Van Durme. 2014. Information extraction over structured data: Question answering with freebase. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 956–966.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Jiawei Zhou, Tahira Naseem, Ramón Fernandez Astudillo, Young-Suk Lee, Radu Florian, and Salim Roukos. 2021. Structure-aware Fine-tuning of Sequence-to-sequence Transformers for Transition-based AMR Parsing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.15534 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Jianyun Zou, Min Yang, Lichao Zhang, Yechen Xu, Qifan Pan, Fengqing Jiang, Ran Qin, Shushu Wang, Yifan He, Songfang Huang, 2021. A chinese multi-type complex questions answering dataset over wikidata. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.06086 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Understanding and Answering Incomplete Questions

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)182
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)33

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format