skip to main content
10.1145/3572549.3572579acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicetcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Utilisation of Interactive Simulations in the Teaching and Learning of a Grade 10 Chemistry Topic: A Case in the North West province of South Africa: The utilisation of interactive simulations in Chemistry

Published:13 February 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study focussed on the utilisation of interactive simulations in the teaching and learning of a Grade 10 Chemistry topic (three states of matter [TSM]) – specifically sub-microscopic behaviour of particles – in the South African context. In this study, the utilisation of PhET interactive simulations is twofold: (i) for conceptual understanding of TSM; (ii) and for administering a practical experiment. The overarching theoretical framework underpinning this study is experiential learning theory. In order to understand and capture in-depth data, it was ideal to adopt an interpretive, exploratory qualitative case study approach rather than a quantitative approach. This study was conducted in one of the nine educational provinces (North West) of South Africa, where the authors reside, hence convenience sampling was employed to select the province. Two in-service Grade 10 Physical Sciences teachers from two rural secondary schools were purposively selected from one of the four educational districts in the North West province. A code-to-theory model was used to analyse the data. The main findings of this study showed that, despite the advantages of PhET interactive simulations to promote conceptual understanding and allowing for the administration of TSM laboratory experiments, interactive simulations may result in misconceptions. It is recommended that PhET interactive simulations be utilised for effective teaching and learning of abstract concepts and conceptual understanding of sub-microscopic behaviour of particles in TSM.

References

  1. Department of Basic Education (South Africa). 2011. Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement, grades 10-12, Physical Sciences. Government printing works: Pretoria. http://www.education.gov.za.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Martin S. Silberberg. 2006. Chemistry: The Molecular Nature of Matter and Change. McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Aris, S.R.S., Salleh, M.F.M., & Ismail, M.H. 2020. Guided Cooperative Flipped Classroom Approach in Learning Molecular Orbital Theory. Social Sciences, 10(14), 200-212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley, J.D., & Brand, M. 1985. “Stamping Out Misconceptions.” Journal of Chemical Education 62 (4): 318. doi:10.1021/ed062p318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Del Pozo, R.M. 2001. Prospective teachers' ideas about the relationships between concepts describing the composition of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 23(4), 353-371.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gencer, S., & Akkus, H. 2021. The topic-specific nature of experienced chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in the topics of interactions between chemical species and states of matter. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(2), 498-512.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Sebatana, M.J., & Dudu, W.T. 2021. Reality or Mirage: Enhancing 21st-Century Skills Through Problem-Based Learning While Teaching Particulate Nature of Matter. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10206-w.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Pitjeng-Mosabala, P., & Rollnick, M. 2018. Exploring the development of novice unqualified graduate teachers’ topic-specific PCK in teaching the particulate nature of matter in South Africa's classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 40(7), 742–770.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Dudu, W.T. & Vhurumuku, E. 2012. Teachers’ practices of inquiry when teaching investigations: A case study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(6), 579-600.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Dunn, J. & Ramnarain, U. 2020. The Effect of Simulation-Supported Inquiry on South African Natural Sciences Learners’ Understanding of Atomic and Molecular Structures. Education Sciences, 10(280):1-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bell, B., Bradley, J.D., & Steenberg, E. 2015. Chemistry Education through microscale experiments. Chemistry Education: Best Practices, Opportunities and Trends.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Adams, W.K. 2010. Student engagement and learning with PhET interactive simulations. Il nuovo cimento C, 33(3), 21-32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Correia, A.P., Koehler, N., Thompson, A., & Phye, G. 2019. The application of PhET simulation to teach gas behavior on the submicroscopic level: secondary school students’ perceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 37(2), 193-217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Ma, J., & J.V. Nickerson. 2006. “Hands-On, Simulated and Remote Laboratories: A Comparative Literature Review.” ACM Computing Surveys 38 (3): 1–24. doi:10.1145/1132960.1132961.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kincaid, J.P., & Westerlund, K.K. 2009. Simulation in Education and Training. In M. D. Rossetti, H. R. R, B. Johansson, A. Dunklin, & R. Ingalls (Ed.), Winter Simulation Conference. Austin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Prima, E., Putri, A.R. & Rustaman, N. 2018. Learning Solar System Using PhET Simulation to Improve Students' Understanding and Motivation. Journal of Science Learning, 1(2):60-70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Siswoyo, S., & Muliyati, D. 2021, April. Teaching high school physics using PhET interactive simulation. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2331, No. 1, p. 030003). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Putranta, H. & Wilujeng, I. 2019. Physics learning by PhET simulation-assisted using problem based learning (PBL) model to improve students' critical thinking skills in work and energy chapters in MAN 3 Sleman. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 20(1):1-45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Zenios, M. 2020. Educational theory in technology enhanced learning revisited: A model for simulation-based learning in higher education. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1). http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/35879/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Erdem, A., 2019. A Study on Teachers' Views on the Use of Technology to Improve Physics Education in High Schools. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(4), pp.142-153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mick Healey & Alan Jenkins. 2000. Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory and Its Application in Geography in Higher Education, Journal of Geography, 99:5, 185-195, DOI: 10.1080/00221340008978967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. De Freitas, S., & Neumann, T. 2009. The use of “exploratory learning” for supporting immersive learning in virtual environments. Computers & Education 52, 343–352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. McCrary, N.E. & Mazur, J.M. 2010. Conceptualizing a narrative simulation to promote dialogic reflection: using a multiple outcome design to engage teacher mentors. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(3):325-342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Vygotsky, L. 1978. ‘Interaction between learning and development’, in M. Gauvain & M. Cole (eds.), Readings on the development of children, pp. 79-91, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Podolefsky, N.; Moore, E.B.; Perkins, K.K. 2013. Implicit scaffolding in interactive simulations: Design strategies to support multiple educational goals. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.6544.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Yu, M.O. 2017. Vygotsky's social constructivism. Bulletin. ХАБАРШЫСЫ ВЕСТНИК. (pp. 115-121).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. McLeod, S. 2018. Vygotsky | Simply Psychology. Retrieved October 15, 2018, from https://www.simplypsychology.org/vygotsky.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Naidoo, J. 2017. Exploring the use of activity theory as a framework for the teaching and learning of mathematics. Pythagoras, 33(1), pp. 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Thanh, N.C. & Thanh, T.T. 2015. The interconnection between interpretivist paradigm and qualitative methods in education. American Journal of Educational Science, 1(2):24-27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Yin, R.K. 2014. Case study research design and methods. London: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (South Africa). 2020. Profile and Analysis: Dr Ruth Segomotsi Mompati District Development Model. Government printing works: Pretoria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Alabdelwahab, S.Q. 2002. Portfolio assessment: A qualitative investigation of portfolio self- assessment practices in an intermediate EFL classroom, Saudi Arabia. Columbus: OSU. (Dissertation- PhD).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Saldaña, J. 2013. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Gibbs, G.R. 2007. Analysing qualitative data. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Connelly, L.M. 2016. Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg Nursing, 25(6), 435–437.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Krefting, L. 1991. Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 214-222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Liamputtong, P. 2013. The science of words and the science of numbers. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Utilisation of Interactive Simulations in the Teaching and Learning of a Grade 10 Chemistry Topic: A Case in the North West province of South Africa: The utilisation of interactive simulations in Chemistry

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICETC '22: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers
      October 2022
      628 pages
      ISBN:9781450397766
      DOI:10.1145/3572549

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 February 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format