skip to main content
10.1145/3572549.3572582acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicetcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Perceptions of MLearning Student Generated Activities for STEM in Educational Paradigm at Malaysian Universities

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 February 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The emergence of mobile learning, or mLearning, gives students hope to become more motivated to learn STEM by bringing their personal mobile devices. This study investigated Malaysian students' STEM mobile learning experiences through student-generated activities in learning STEM. STEM has the lowest uptake for Malaysian students as the subjects are difficult to understand. Therefore, this study embarked on the methodology, which was mainly qualitative in order to have an in-depth inquiry through focus group discussions with students from universities in Malaysia. The findings were themes developed from the data gained prior to student-generated activities. Next, the themes that emerged after the student-generated activities. Finally, mLearning best practices for STEM had been proposed for student-generated activities. Likewise, the main contribution of this study was insights from the Malaysian universities and lecturers’ perspectives for mLearning student-generated activities in STEM subjects. The implications of this study are the best practices for mLearning at Malaysian universities.

References

  1. Shamsul Arrieya Ariffin, Faiz Daud., Nurul Hazlina Noordin, Amirrudin Kamsin, & Tee Tze Kiong. 2020. Early Investigation of the impact of mobile learning ethics on student-generated activities for STEM subjects in a local Malaysian university context. J. of Interactive Mobile Technologies 14, 5, 210-218. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i05.13359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Shamsul Arrieya Ariffin, Maizatul Hayati Mohamad Yatim, & Faiz Daud. 2019. Identification of Usability Impact of Mobile Learning STEM in a Local University Context. In Proceedings of the 5th International ACM, Cooperation HCI and UX Conference, 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328243.3328257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Shamsul Arrieya Ariffin, S. A. 2018. Towards a smart educational environment framework for learning in a Malaysian context. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Human- Computer Interaction and User Experience in Indonesia, CHIuXiD'18, 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1145/3205946.3205957.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Shamsul Arrieya Ariffin. 2017. Needs and potentials for studying local Malaysian culture through mobile learning. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction and User Experience in Indonesia, 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077343.3077352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Shamsul Arrieya Ariffin. 2016. Academics' Perspectives on the Challenges and Opportunities for Student-Generated Mobile Content in Malaysia. International J. of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL) 8, 3, 49-64. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2016070104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Muneera Bano, Didar Zowghi, Matthew Kearney, Sandra Schuck, Peter Aubusson. 2018. Mobile learning for science and mathematics education: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Computers & Education 121, 2018, 30-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Barbour, R. 2007. Doing focus group. London: SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2, 77-101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kevin Burden, Matthew Kearney, Sandra Schuck, &Tony Hall. 2019. Investigating the use of innovative mobile pedagogies for school- aged students: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education138. 2019, 83-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Helen Crompton & John Traxler, J. (Eds.). 2016. Mobile Learning and STEM: Case Studies in Practice. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Laurel Evelyn Dyson, L. E. 2016. Achieving sustainable mobile learning through student-owned devices and student-generated multimedia content. In Wan Ng, Therese M. Cumming, Sustaining mobile learning: Theory, research and practice. 212-226. New York, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315766553.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Laurel Evelyn Dyson; Elaine Lawrence; Andrew Litchfield; Agnieszka Zmijewska. 2008. M-fieldwork for information systems students. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008), 30-58. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2008.236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mohamed Amin Embi, and Norazah Mohd Nordin. 2013. Mobile learning: Malaysian initiatives and research findings. Malaysia: Centre for Academic Advancement, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Heather Gonzalez & Jeffrey Kuenzi. 2012. Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service. In Library of Congress.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Naveenta Gupta, Sonia Garg, Khushdeep Arora. 2016. Pattern of mobile phone usage and its effects on psychological health, sleep, and academic performance in students of a medical university. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy & Pharmacology 6, 2, 132-139. doi: 10.5455/njppp.2016.6.0311201599.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. David Kolb.1984. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development, 1 edn, Prentice Hall, New Jersey USA, 1- 256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Donna M. Mertens. 2010. Research and evaluation in education and psychology, 3 Ed., Sage Publications Inc., Oaks California, USA, 1-527.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Scott Motlik, S. 2008. Mobile Learning in Developing Nations. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 9,2. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i2.564Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. David Silverman. 2013. Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: SAGE Publications Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Perceptions of MLearning Student Generated Activities for STEM in Educational Paradigm at Malaysian Universities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICETC '22: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers
      October 2022
      628 pages
      ISBN:9781450397766
      DOI:10.1145/3572549

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      © 2022 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 February 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format