skip to main content
10.1145/3572921.3572926acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploration in Open-World Videogames: Environment, Items, Locations, Quests, and Combat in The Witcher 3

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this research is to examine how players engage in exploration in videogames. Open-world games are becoming increasingly popular, however, despite this growing popularity, empirical research into how players engage in these spaces is still emerging. By understanding how players will explore, designers can continue to create engaging open-world experiences. A diary study was conducted to examine participants’ gameplay experiences while playing an open-world game. Twelve participants took part in the study by playing The Witcher 3 for two weeks. Through a thematic analysis of participants’ diary entries, five activity themes were found – including exploring quests, items, combat, locations, and interactive environments. The results presented in this paper expands on the emerging research, and provides a deeper understanding of how players engage in exploration in videogames.

References

  1. Ernest Adams. 2014. Fundamentals of Game Design (3rd). New Riders, Berkeley, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ryan Alexander and Chris Martens. 2017. Deriving Quests from Open World Mechanics. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. Association for Computing Machinery, Hyannis, Massachusetts, 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3102071.3102098Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Myat Aung, Simon Demediuk, Yuan Sun, Ye Tu, Yu Ang, Siva Nekkanti, Shantanu Raghav, Diego Klabjan, Rafet Sifa and Anders Drachen. Year. The Trails of Just Cause 2: Spatio-Temporal Player Profiling in Open-World Games. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. 1-11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Richard Bartle. 1996. Hearts, Clubs, Diamonds, Spades: Players Who Suit Muds.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Richard Bartle. 2009. Step 4 : Understand the Limits of Theory. In Beyond Game Design: Nine Steps Towards Creating Better Video Games, Richard A. Bartle and Chris Mark Bateman Eds. Course Technology/Cengage Learning, Boston, Mass United Kingdom, 117-133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chris Bateman and Richard Boon. 2006. 21st Century Game Design. Charles River Media, Inc., Hingham, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chris Bateman, Rebecca Lowenhaupt and Lennart E Nacke. 2011. Player Typology in Theory and Practice. In Proceedings of Proceedings of DiGRA. 24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Daniel E Berlyne. 1966. Curiosity and Exploration. Science 153, 3731, 25-33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Don Carson. 2000. Environmental Storytelling: Creating Immersive 3d Worlds Using Lessons Learned from the Theme Park Industry. Gamasutra. com 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Scott Carter and Jennifer Mankoff. Year. When Participants Do the Capturing: The Role of Media in Diary Studies. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 899-908.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. CD Projekt RED. 2015. The Witcher 3. CD Projekt,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jack Denham and Matthew Spokes. 2020. The Right to the Virtual City: Rural Retreatism in Open-World Video Games. New Media & Society 23, 6, 1567-1583.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Carlo Fabricatore. Year. Gameplay and Game Mechanics Design: A Key to Quality in Videogames. In Proceedings of OECD-CERI Expert Meeting on Videogames and Education. 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1125.4167Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Robert Gillham. Year. Diary Studies as a Tool for Efficient Cross-Cultural Design. In Proceedings of IWIPS. 57-65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Marcello A. Gómez-Maureira, Isabelle Kniestedt, Max Van Duijn, Carolien Rieffe and Aske Plaat. 2021. Level Design Patterns That Invoke Curiosity-Driven Exploration: An Empirical Study across Multiple Conditions. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 5, CHI PLAY, 1-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3474698Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Marcello A Gómez Maureira and Isabelle Kniestedt. Year. Games That Make Curious: An Exploratory Survey into Digital Games That Invoke Curiosity. In Proceedings of International Conference on Entertainment Computing. Springer, 76-89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Greg Guest, Kathleen M MacQueen and Emily E Namey. 2011. Applied Thematic Analysis. SAGE Publications,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Robin Hunicke, Marc LeBlanc and Robert Zubek. Year. Mda: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI. 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. International Hobo. 2009. Brainhex. Retrieved 19th June, 2020 from https://blog.brainhex.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Mostafa Javadi and Koroush Zarea. 2016. Understanding Thematic Analysis and Its Pitfall. Journal of Client Care 1, 1, 33-39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Reed Larson and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2014. The Experience Sampling Method. In Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology, Springer, 21-34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. [22] Sus Lundgren and Staffan Bjork. Year. Game Mechanics: Describing Computer-Augmented Games in Terms of Interaction. In Proceedings of Proceedings of TIDSE. 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Alison McMahan. 2003. Immersion, Engagement and Presence. The video game theory reader 67, 86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nicole McMahon, Peta Wyeth and Daniel Johnson. 2015. Engaging in Videogame Play: An Activity-Centric Analysis of the Player Experience. In Proceedings of OzCHI '15 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer-Human Interaction. ACM, Melbourne, Australia, 101-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838781Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Matt Miller. 2018. The Best Open Worlds of E3 2018. Retrieved from https://www.gameinformer.com/e3-2018/2018/06/15/the-best-open-worlds-of-e3-2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Lennart E Nacke, Chris Bateman and Regan L Mandryk. Year. Brainhex: Preliminary Results from a Neurobiological Gamer Typology Survey. In Proceedings of ICEC. Springer, 288-293.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mihajlo Nenad. 2018. Designing Game Worlds. Coherence in the Design of Open World Games through Procedural Generation Techniques. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts. Association for Computing Machinery, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 353–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3270316.3270319Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Noclip. 2017. Designing the World of the Witcher 3. Retrieved 19 May, 2022 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSS5T4od-GQ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Tomáš Plch. 2018. Belieavable Decision Making in Large Scale Open World Games for Ambient Characters.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Cambridge University Press. 2020. Exploration. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/exploration.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Chen Si, Yusuf Pisan, Chek Tien Tan and Songjia Shen. 2017. An Initial Understanding of How Game Users Explore Virtual Environments. Entertainment Computing 19, 13-27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Ron Tamborini and Paul Skalski. 2006. The Role of Presence in the Experience of Electronic Games. Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences, 225-240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Gustavo F. Tondello, Karina Arrambide, Giovanni Ribeiro, Andrew Jian-lan Cen and Lennart E. Nacke. Year. “I Don't Fit into a Single Type”: A Trait Model and Scale of Game Playing Preferences. In Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019. Springer International Publishing, 375-395.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Jukka Vahlo, Johanna K Kaakinen, Suvi K. Holm and Aki Koponen. 2017. Digital Game Dynamics Preferences and Player Types. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22, 2, 88-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12181Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Nicole Vickery, Nicoletta Tancred, Peta Wyeth and Daniel Johnson. Year. Directing Narrative in Gameplay: Player Interaction in Shaping Narrative in the Witcher 3. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. ACM, 495-500.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Brian Winn. 2008. The Design, Play, and Experience Framework. Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education 3, 1010-1024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Richard TA Wood, Mark D Griffiths, Darren Chappell and Mark NO Davies. 2004. The Structural Characteristics of Video Games: A Psycho-Structural Analysis. CyberPsychology & behavior 7, 1, 1-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Nick Yee. 2006. Motivations for Play in Online Games. CyberPsychology & behavior 9, 6, 772-775.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Exploration in Open-World Videogames: Environment, Items, Locations, Quests, and Combat in The Witcher 3
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)106
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format