skip to main content
10.1145/3573382.3616032acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cool Little Playable Things: Supporting Transformational Games Outside Formal Contexts

Published: 06 October 2023 Publication History
First page of PDF

References

[1]
Julia Ayumi Bopp, Elisa D. Mekler, and Klaus Opwis. 2016. Negative Emotion, Positive Experience?: Emotionally Moving Moments in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2996–3006. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858227
[2]
Julia Ayumi Bopp, Klaus Opwis, and Elisa D. Mekler. 2018. "An Odd Kind of Pleasure": Differentiating Emotional Challenge in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173615
[3]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.
[4]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2019. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exxercise and Health 11, 4 (2019), 589–597.
[5]
Owen Chapman and Kim Sawchuk. 2012. Creation: Intervention, Analysis and “Family Resemblances”. Canadian Journal of Communication (2012), 5–26.
[6]
Matthew Conlen and Jeffrey Heer. 2022. Fidyll: A Compiler for Cross-Format Data Stories & Explorable Explanations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.09858 (2022).
[7]
Sabrina Culyba. 2018. The Transformational Framework: A process tool for the development of Transformational games. Carnegie Mellon University.
[8]
Sara De Freitas. 2018. Are games effective learning tools? A review of educational games. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 21, 2 (2018), 74–84.
[9]
Jesper Hyldahl Fogh. 2018. Explorable Explanations: What are they? What do they explain? How do we work with them? Let’s find out. Master’s thesis. Malmö University/Kultur och samhälle.
[10]
Galactic Cafe. 2013. The Stanley Parable. Game [Windows, macOS, Linux]. Galactic Cafe.
[11]
Kutub Gandhi, Josh Aaron Miller, and Seth Cooper. 2022. “Philosophy is Seeped into Every Brick”-Weaving Reflective Elements into Mass-Market Games. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. 1–10.
[12]
Kutub Gandhi, Josh Aaron Miller, Sofia Eleni Spatharioti, Archana Apte, Borna Fatehi, Sara Wylie, and Seth Cooper. 2021. A Comparison of Augmented Reality and Browser Versions of a Citizen Science Game. In The 16th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG) 2021. 1–8.
[13]
Kutub Gandhi, Sofia Eleni Spatharioti, Scott Eustis, Sara Wylie, and Seth Cooper. 2022. Performance of Paid and Volunteer Image Labeling in Citizen Science—A Retrospective Analysis. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, Vol. 10. 64–73.
[14]
José Pedro Pinto Garcia. 2021. Games for non-gamers: Approaching video games from a non-gamer perspective. (2021).
[15]
Sam Gilbert. 2010. Ethics at play: Patterns of ethical thinking among young online gamers. In Ethics and game design: Teaching values through play. IGI Global, 151–166.
[16]
Pontus Granström. 2016. Explorable Explanations on Statistical Physics. Master’s thesis. Chalmers University of Technology.
[17]
Casper Harteveld. 2011. Triadic game design: Balancing reality, meaning and play. Springer Science & Business Media.
[18]
Dorothée Hefner, Christoph Klimmt, and Peter Vorderer. 2007. Identification with the Player Character as Determinant of Video Game Enjoyment. In Entertainment Computing – ICEC 2007, Lizhuang Ma, Matthias Rauterberg, and Ryohei Nakatsu (Eds.). Vol. 4740. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74873-1_6 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[19]
Lacey J. Hilliard, Mary H. Buckingham, G. John Geldhof, Patricia Gansert, Caroline Stack, Erin S. Gelgoot, Marina U. Bers, and Richard M. Lerner. 2018. Perspective taking and decision-making in educational game play: A mixed-methods study. Applied Developmental Science 22, 1 (Jan. 2018), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2016.1204918
[20]
Rilla Khaled. 2018. Questions over answers: Reflective game design. In Playful disruption of digital media. Springer, 3–27.
[21]
Rilla Khaled, Jonathan Lessard, and Pippin Barr. 2018. Documenting trajectories in design space: a methodology for applied game design research. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, FDG 2018, Malmö, Sweden, August 07-10, 2018, Steve Dahlskog, Sebastian Deterding, José M. Font, Mitu Khandaker, Carl Magnus Olsson, Sebastian Risi, and Christoph Salge (Eds.). ACM, 27:1–27:10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3235765.3235767
[22]
Gene Koo and Scott Seider. 2010. Video games for prosocial learning. In Ethics and game design: Teaching values through play. IGI Global, 16–33.
[23]
Sam Lau and Philip J Guo. 2020. Data Theater: A live programming environment for prototyping data-driven explorable explanations. In Workshop on Live Programming (LIVE).
[24]
Justin Li. 2019. Experience report: Explorable web apps to teach AI to non-majors. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 34, 4 (2019), 128–133.
[25]
Elisa D Mekler, Ioanna Iacovides, and Julia Ayumi Bopp. 2018. "A Game that Makes You Question..." Exploring the Role of Reflection for the Player Experience. In Proceedings of the 2018 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play. 315–327.
[26]
Edward Morrell. 2020. Player Decentered Design. Master’s thesis. Tampere University.
[27]
Razbuten. 2019. What Games Are Like For Someone Who Doesn’t Play Games. (2019). https://youtu.be/ax7f3JZJHSw
[28]
Doris C Rusch. 2012. "Elude" designing depression. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. 254–257.
[29]
Johnny Saldaña. 2021. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2021), 1–440.
[30]
David Simkins. 2010. Playing with ethics: Experiencing new ways of being in RPGs. In Ethics and game design: Teaching values through play. IGI Global, 69–84.
[31]
Petr Slovák, Christopher Frauenberger, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2017. Reflective practicum: A framework of sensitising concepts to design for transformative reflection. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2696–2707.
[32]
Sofia Eleni Spatharioti, Eliza Boetsch, Scott Eustis, Kutub Gandhi, Matt Rota, Archana Apte, Seth Cooper, and Sara Wylie. 2023. An effective online platform for crowd classification of coastal wetland loss. Conservation Science and Practice 5, 1 (2023), e12844.
[33]
Dan Staines. 2010. Videogames and moral pedagogy: A Neo-Kohlbergian approach. In Ethics and game design: Teaching values through play. IGI Global, 35–51.
[34]
April Tyack and Peta Wyeth. 2017. Exploring relatedness in single-player video game play. In Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. 422–427. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152771.3156149
[35]
Rina R. Wehbe, Edward Lank, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2017. Left Them 4 Dead: Perception of Humans versus Non-Player Character Teammates in Cooperative Gameplay. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064712
[36]
Matthew Alexander Whitby, Sebastian Deterding, and Ioanna Iacovides. 2019. “One of the baddies all along”: Moments that Challenge a Player’s Perspective. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 339–350.
[37]
Douglas Wilson and Miguel Sicart. 2010. Now it’s personal: on abusive game design. In Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology. 40–47.
[38]
Jialing Zeng, Sophie Parks, and Junjie Shang. 2020. To learn scientifically, effectively, and enjoyably: A review of educational games. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2, 2 (2020), 186–195.
[39]
John Zimmerman and Jodi Forlizzi. 2014. Research through design in HCI. In Ways of Knowing in HCI. Springer, 167–189.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI PLAY Companion '23: Companion Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
October 2023
370 pages
ISBN:9798400700293
DOI:10.1145/3573382
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 October 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. education
  2. educational games
  3. explorables
  4. game design
  5. games
  6. reflective games
  7. transformational games

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

CHI PLAY '23
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 421 of 1,386 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 79
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)40
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media