skip to main content
10.1145/3573382.3616036acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

When Games Become Inaccessible: A Constructive Grounded Theory on Stuckness in Videogames

Published:06 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

A player feeling stuck is a player who risks abandoning a game and all their progress. Currently, this experience is an under-explored area in literature and is mostly approached from an expert perspective. A better understanding from a player’s perspective could bring new light on how to correctly identify when it happens and support the player in overcoming the obstacles. We particularly miss information if and how stuckness arises in different genres of games, as in the case of narrative or decision-making games where most goals will depend on the personal preference of the player. We present here a first qualitative study using a constructive grounded theory approach to understand how players experience stuckness. So far we conducted 9 interviews with players and contributed with 1) Thematic analysis of when and why stuckness arises with 37 examples. 2) An in-progress theory that demonstrated that stuckness is experienced in four phases (expectations, unprogress, evaluation, and resolution) and depends on the expectation of a fair and meaningful game. 3) Presenting different types of stuckness, including stuckness caused by expectation, game design balance, social interaction, or accessibility to the game challenge.

References

  1. Ernest Adams. 2009. Fundamental of Game Design.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Craig G Anderson. 2020. Hits, quits, and retries-player response to failure in a challenging video game. In International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3402942.3403025Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Batu Aytemiz and Adam M Smith. 2020. A diagnostic taxonomy of failure in videogames. In International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3402942.3402979Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Julia Ayumi Bopp, Elisa D Mekler, and Klaus Opwis. 2015. "It Was Sad But Still Good" Gratifications of Emotionally Moving Game Experiences. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual acm conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. 1193–1198. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732852Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Julia Ayumi Bopp, Elisa D Mekler, and Klaus Opwis. 2016. Negative emotion, positive experience? Emotionally moving moments in digital games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2996–3006. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858227Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Julia Ayumi Bopp, Klaus Opwis, and Elisa D Mekler. 2018. “An Odd Kind of Pleasure” Differentiating Emotional Challenge in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173615Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kathy Charmaz. 2014. Constructing grounded theory. sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Tom Cole, Paul Cairns, and Marco Gillies. 2015. Emotional and functional challenge in core and avant-garde games. In Proceedings of the 2015 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play. 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2793147Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mia Consalvo. 2009. Cheating: Gaining advantage in videogames. Mit press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Greg Costikyan. 2013. Uncertainty in games. Mit Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Mihaly Csikzentmihaly. 1990. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Vol. 1990. Harper & Row New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Alena Denisova, Julia Ayumi Bopp, Thuy Duong Nguyen, and Elisa D Mekler. 2021. “Whatever the emotional experience, it’s up to them”: Insights from designers of emotionally impactful games. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445286Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Alena Denisova and Paul Cairns. 2015. Adaptation in digital games: the effect of challenge adjustment on player performance and experience. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2793141Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Alena Denisova and Paul Cairns. 2015. The placebo effect in digital games: Phantom perception of adaptive artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2015 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play. 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2793109Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Alena Denisova and Paul Cairns. 2019. Player experience and deceptive expectations of difficulty adaptation in digital games. Entertainment Computing 29 (2019), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2018.12.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Alena Denisova, Paul Cairns, Christian Guckelsberger, and David Zendle. 2020. Measuring perceived challenge in digital games: Development & validation of the challenge originating from recent gameplay interaction scale (CORGIS). International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 137 (2020), 102383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.102383Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tobias Drey, Fabian Fischbach, Pascal Jansen, Julian Frommel, Michael Rietzler, and Enrico Rukzio. 2021. To Be or Not to Be Stuck, or Is It a Continuum? A Systematic Literature Review on the Concept of Being Stuck in Games. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CHI PLAY (2021), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474656Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Tobias Drey, Pascal Jansen, Fabian Fischbach, Julian Frommel, and Enrico Rukzio. 2020. Towards progress assessment for adaptive hints in educational virtual reality games. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382789Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Charline Foch and Ben Kirman. 2021. “Slow down and look”: Desirable aspects of failure in video games, from the perspective of players.. In The 16th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG) 2021. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472538.3472569Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Francesca Foffano and David Thue. 2019. Changes of user experience in an adaptive game: a study of an AI manager. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3337722.3341857Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Gameloft High Voltage Software Gameloft, Beenox. 1982-2003. Spiderman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Accessible Games. 2022. Accessible Player Experiences (APX). https://accessible.games/accessible-player-experiences/ Accessed: 23-08-2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ioanna Iacovides, Anna L Cox, and Thomas Knoll. 2014. Learning the game: breakdowns, breakthroughs and player strategies. In CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2215–2220. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581304Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jesper Juul. 2013. The art of failure: An essay on the pain of playing video games. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Eleanor O’Rourke, Christy Ballweber, and Zoran Popovií. 2014. Hint systems may negatively impact performance in educational games. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference. 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566248Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Serge Petralito, Florian Brühlmann, Glena Iten, Elisa D Mekler, and Klaus Opwis. 2017. A good reason to die: how avatar death and high challenges enable positive experiences. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5087–5097. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026047Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Christopher Power, Paul Cairns, Alena Denisova, Themis Papaioannou, and Ruth Gultom. 2019. Lost at the edge of uncertainty: Measuring player uncertainty in digital games. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 35, 12 (2019), 1033–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1507161Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. David Thue, Vadim Bulitko, Marcia Spetch, and Michael Webb. 2009. Exaggerated claims for interactive stories. In Joint International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling. Springer, 179–184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. When Games Become Inaccessible: A Constructive Grounded Theory on Stuckness in Videogames

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI PLAY Companion '23: Companion Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
          October 2023
          370 pages
          ISBN:9798400700293
          DOI:10.1145/3573382

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 October 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate421of1,386submissions,30%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)84
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format