skip to main content
10.1145/3573382.3616083acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

“Better Dead than a Damsel”: Gender Representation and Player Churn

Published:06 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Gender representation in games is an important consideration at least in part due to its pervasiveness, from toxicity shown towards both non-male players and non-male people that work in the industry, to the sexualisation of characters and persistence of tropes like the damsel in distress. Player churn is an important concept for industry as it shows disengagement from the product and can cause the developer to lose income, such as through lost microtransaction revenue, and cause higher acquisition costs to replace the lost players. Despite the first male protagonist appearing on screens in 1968, it took until 1996 for the first female protagonist to be developed in the form of Lara Croft and, despite progress, gender representation in games still has room for improvement. To critically assess and analyse this issue, this paper explores a history of damsels, design of protagonists, gender identity and cultivation theory. To contribute towards the literature on player churn and gender representation, this paper investigated player churn through protagonist gender. A Brunner-Munzel test was conducted to compare the gender of the protagonist (males or non-males) of 48 games with player churn. Gender was identified through either self-identification of the protagonist in-game, or through pronouns used by other characters when referring to them. Player churn was identified as the difference in daily players playing the game averaged over the first 7 days from the release of a game, days 30-37 from release and days 90-97 from release. This data was acquired from SteamDB, which records daily players of games that are played through the Steam client. Whilst no significant difference was found after either 30-37 days or 90-97 days between the two conditions, within the games investigated, those with a male protagonist generally attracted higher initial playerbases and also saw a steeper drop off in these players after both 30-37 days and 90-97 days. Whilst this could indicate that, despite not attracting as many players initially, games with non-male protagonists attract a more loyal playerbase. These results show that investigation of player churn in this way shows promise to quantifying gender representation.

References

  1. Game Debate 2015. Global Game Awards 2015. Game Debate. https://www.game-debate.com/awards/2015Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Markus Appel and Timo Gnambs. 2022. Women in fiction: Bechdel-Wallace Test results for the highest-grossing movies of the last four decades.Psychology of Popular Media (Sep 2022). https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000436Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Zoheb H. Borbora and Jaideep Srivastava. 2012. User Behavior Modelling Approach for Churn Prediction in Online Games. In 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing. 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.84Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chris Bowring. 2018. The Sexualization of ‘Bayonetta’ is Fine… With the Right Context. https://goombastomp.com/the-sexualisation-of/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P Brisa. 2023. Gender Representation in Video Games. https://doi.org/10.34740/KAGGLE/DSV/4482342Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Laurent Bègue, Elisa Sarda, Douglas A. Gentile, Clementine Bry, and Sebastian Roché. 2017. Video Games Exposure and Sexism in a Representative Sample of Adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00466Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Paul Cairns. 2019. Doing Better Statistics in Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108685139Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Game Developers Conference. 2022. State of the Game Industry. https://reg.gdconf.com/LP=3493Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. E. Dijkstra. 1979. Go to statement considered harmful. In Classics in software engineering (incoll). Yourdon Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 27–33. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1241515.1241518Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Edward Downs and Stacy L. Smith. 2010. Keeping Abreast of Hypersexuality: A Video Game Character Content Analysis. Sex Roles 62, 11 (Jun 2010), 721–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9637-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lisa K. Fazio and Carrie L. Sherry. 2020. The Effect of Repetition on Truth Judgments Across Development. 31, 9 (2020), 1150–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939534Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Amber L. Ferris, Sandi W. Smith, Bradley S. Greenberg, and Stacy L. Smith. 2007. The Content of Reality Dating Shows and Viewer Perceptions of Dating. Journal of Communication 57, 3 (Sep 2007), 490–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00354.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Dalila Forni. 2020. Horizon Zero Dawn: The Educational Influence of Video Games in Counteracting Gender Stereotypes. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association 5, 1 (Mar 2020). https://doi.org/10.26503/todigra.v5i1.111Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Yew Mun Gabriel Chong, Kie Zin Scott Teng, Sok Cheng Amy Siew, and Marko M. Skoric. 2012. Cultivation Effects of Video Games: A Longer-Term Experimental Test of First- and Second-Order Effects. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 31, 9 (Nov 2012), 952–971. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2012.31.9.952Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Leya George, Aneesha Singh, Nadia Berthouze, Lorna Hobbs, and Jo Gibbs. 2023. Jamming-as-exploration: Creating and Playing Games to Explore Gender Identity. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580646Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. George Gerbner and L. Gross. 1976. Living With Television: The Violence Profile. The Journal of communication 26 (06 1976), 173–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01397.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Meghan Gestos, Jennifer Smith-Merry, and Andrew Campbell. 2018. Representation of Women in Video Games: A Systematic Review of Literature in Consideration of Adult Female Wellbeing. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 21, 9 (Sep 2018), 535–541. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0376Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Arthur Gies. 2014. Bayonetta 2 review: heaven and hell. https://www.polygon.com/2014/10/13/6957677/bayonetta-2-review-wii-uGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Fabian Hadiji, Rafet Sifa, Anders Drachen, Christian Thurau, Kristian Kersting, and Christian Bauckhage. 2014. Predicting player churn in the wild. In 2014 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2014.6932876Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Aumyo Hassan and Sarah J. Barber. 2021. The Effects of Repetition Frequency on the Illusory Truth Effect. 6, 1 (2021), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00301-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ji Yoon Jang, Sangyoon Lee, and Byungjoo Lee. 2019. Quantification of Gender Representation Bias in Commercial Films based on Image Analysis. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov 2019), 198:1–198:29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359300Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Cross Katherine. 2016. Opinion: Being sexy and not sexist - a look at Bayonetta. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/design/opinion-being-sexy-and-not-sex-i-ist-i—a-look-at-i-bayonetta-i-and-objectificationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaya Kawale, Aditya Pal, and Jaideep Srivastava. 2009. Churn Prediction in MMORPGs: A Social Influence Based Approach. In 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, Vol. 4. 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSE.2009.80Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Laura Koesten, Elena Simperl, Tom Blount, Emilia Kacprzak, and Jeni Tennison. 2020. Everything you always wanted to know about a dataset: Studies in data summarisation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 135 (Mar 2020), 102367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.10.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Xeniya Kondrat. 2015. Gender and video games: How is female gender generally represented in various genres of video games?Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology 6, 1 (Jun 2015), 171–193. http://compaso.eu/wpd/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Compaso2015-61-Kondrat.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Shannon Liao. 2022. Since lawsuit, Riot Games’ once all-male leadership now over 20 percent women. Washington Post (Aug 2022). https://www.washingtonpost.com/video-games/2022/08/10/riot-games-diversity-report-lawsuit/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Stephanie Rennick, Melanie Clinton, Elena Ioannidou, Liana Oh, Charlotte Clooney, E. T., Edward Healy, and Seán G. Roberts. 2023. Gender bias in video game dialogue. Royal Society Open Science 10, 5 (May 2023), 221095. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221095Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Shaghayegh Roohi, Asko Relas, Jari Takatalo, Henri Heiskanen, and Perttu Hämäläinen. 2020. Predicting Game Difficulty and Churn Without Players. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1145/3410404.3414235Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Cosima Rughiniș, Răzvan Rughiniș, and Toma Elisabeta. 2016. Three Shadowed Dimensions of Feminine Presence in Video Games. (2016). http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/paper_321.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Samit Sarkar. 2015. Here Are the Nominees for The Game Awards 2015. Polygon. https://www.polygon.com/2015/11/13/9728874/the-game-awards-2015-nomineesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Stacy Smith, Marc Choueiti, Katherine Pieper, Traci Gillig, Carmen Lee, and Dylan DeLuca. 2015. Inequality in 700 Popular Films: Examining Portrayals of Gender, Race, and LGBT Status from 2007 to 2014. (08 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. [32] Statista. 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/453634/game-developer-gender-distribution-worldwide/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] Statista. 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/232383/gender-split-of-us-computer-and-video-gamers/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Andrea Trama. 2022. Bayonetta 3 Erases Years of Women-Empowering Character Development and LGBTQIA+ Representation. https://gamerant.com/bayonetta-3-women-empowering-lgbtqia-representation-relationships-luka-jeanne-sexualization/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Dmitri Williams. 2006. Virtual Cultivation: Online Worlds, Offline Perceptions. 56, 1 (2006), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00004.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Su Xue, Meng Wu, John Kolen, Navid Aghdaie, and Kazi A. Zaman. 2017. Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment for Maximized Engagement in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion(WWW ’17 Companion). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 465–471. https://doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3054170Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. “Better Dead than a Damsel”: Gender Representation and Player Churn

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI PLAY Companion '23: Companion Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
        October 2023
        370 pages
        ISBN:9798400700293
        DOI:10.1145/3573382

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 October 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate421of1,386submissions,30%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)84
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format