skip to main content
10.1145/3573428.3573656acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseitceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Concrete Inspection Signal Pre-processing Method Based On TFM Imaging

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The concrete structure contains a large amount of gravel, aggregate and steel bars, which form a variety of acoustic interfaces. The signal components in the concrete structure are complex, and the ultrasonic energy is easily attenuated. Ultrasonic testing for concrete structure has always been a research hotspot. In order to improve the concrete detection resolution and signal-to-noise ratio, a concrete ultrasonic array detection method based on the total focusing method is proposed. At first, the concrete ultrasonic array simulation study is carried out through the establishment of a concrete finite element model, and the array probes are stimulated sequentially by simulating a excitation and multi-receiving method, and the detection signal is obtained; Then full matrix capture is obtained after convoluted filtering, waveform envelope analysis and signal sharpening processing which would avoid errors caused by noise and phase; Finally, the full matrix capture is processed and imaged according to the total focusing method to display the model detection results. The simulation experiment results show that the proposed imaging algorithm can achieve higher resolution and signal-to-noise ratio compared with the synthetic aperture focusing algorithm.

References

  1. ZHENG ShouRen., SUN ZhiYu., ZHU HongBing. Mass concrete construction technology of the Three Gorges Project. SCIENTIA SINICA Technologica, 2017, 47(8): 796-804.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. LIU Zhao. Historical Review and Development Concern of Concrete Bridges. Bridge Construction, 2013, 43(5): 5-11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. WANG Peng., HAN Qingbang. The influence of surface opening cracks on the sound wave near concrete surface. Technical Acoustics, 2017, 36(3): 247-251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. CHANG Junjie., LI Juanjuan. Application of Synthetic Aperture Algorithm in the Detection of Concrete. Nondestructive Testing, 2017, 39(4): 22-25,30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chai H K., Momoki S. Tomographic reconstruction for concrete using attenuation of ultrasound. NDT & E International, 2011, 44(2): 206-215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. SHAO Zhixue., ASHI Lihua., ZHANG Qi. Research and Realization of Concrete Ultrasonic Detecting Technology. Journal of Vibration, Measurement & Diagnosis, 2012, 32(3): 397-401,513.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Li Q., Wang Y., Liu R. Research on Ultrasonic Computerized Tomography Imaging Method of Concrete Materials Based on Simulated Annealing Genetic Algorithm. Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2015, 32(3): 341-347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. SUN Baoshen., SHEN Jianzhong. Synthetic Aperture Focusing Ultrasound Imaging part one. Applied Acoustics, 1992, 12(3): 43-48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. LI Qiufeng., SHI Lihua,, LIANG Dakai.: Research on 2D imaging technique for concrete cross section. Chinese Journal of Acoustics, 2010, 29(1): 85-96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. LIAO Yin., XIONG Bicheng., LI Q. Study on Imaging Algorithm by Using Ultrasonic Array Probes for Concrete Structures. Piezoelectrics & Acoustooptics, 2012, 34 (6): 932-935.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. SHAO Zhixue., SHI Lihua. Design and application of a small size SAFT imaging system forconcrete structure. Review of Scientific InstrumentS, 2011, 82(7): 073708.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. WANG Zhenyu., LIU Guohua. An Experimental Study on Acoustic Travel Time Tomography of Concrete Component. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2005, 38(6): 110-114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. LI Qiufeng., MA Huicong. Application of Improved Computerized Tomography Algorithm in Concrete Ultrasonic Imaging. Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2012, 7(2): 104-108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. ZHANG Dong., GUI Jie., ZHOU Zhehai. A review of total focusing method for ultrasonic phased array imaging. Technical Acoustics, 2018, 37(4): 320-325.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. CHEN Yao., LUO Zhongbing. Modeling of ultrasonic propagation in heavy-walled centrifugally cast austenitic stainless steel based on EBSD analysis. Ultrasonics, 2015, 59: 31-39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. CHEN Yao, MAO Qiuqin. Research on high-speed total focusing ultrasonic imaging method based on Omega-K algorithm. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2018, 39(09):128-134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Weston M., Nageswaran C. Calibration of ultrasonic techniques using full matrix capture data for industrial inspecton. Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Conditong Monitoring, 2012, 54(11): 602-611.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. LI Qiufeng., SHI Lihua, LIANG Dakai. Study on 2D imaging technique for concrete cross section based on SAFT. Acta Acustica, 2008, 33(4): 370-377.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. LV Xiaoguang., WANG Mingquan., LI Guangya.: Application of Synthetic Aperture Focusing Technique in Ultrasonic Detection of Concrete. Journal of Graphics, 2014, 35(6): 950-953.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. SUN Baoshen. Applications and development of synthetic aperture imaging. Applied Acoustics, 2018, 37(05): 787-793.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. LI Li., WEI Wei., XIA Wang.: Coal-rock ultrasonic imaging and testing research based on synthetic aperture focusing technology. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2018, 47(04): 727-734.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. LI Qiufeng., SHI Lihua. LIANG D. Study on an Improved SAFT Algorithm. Piezoelectrics & Acoustooptics, 2009, 31(3): 440-443.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Li Yan.: Ultrasonic Phased Array Imaging Testing by Total Focusing Method. Nondestructive Testing, 2017, 39(5): 57-64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. ZHOU Zhenggan., Author, PENG Di., : Research on Phased Array Ultrasonic Total Focusing Method and its Calibration. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 51(10): 1-7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. HU Yuping., GAO Hongbo. Ultrasonic Testing of the Flaw Size in the Al/Al Adhesive Structure Based on Hilbert Transform. Nondestructive Testing, 2017, 39(11): 39-43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Concrete Inspection Signal Pre-processing Method Based On TFM Imaging

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EITCE '22: Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering
      October 2022
      1999 pages
      ISBN:9781450397148
      DOI:10.1145/3573428

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 March 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate508of972submissions,52%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format