skip to main content
10.1145/3573428.3573737acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseitceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ensemble Learning for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Segmentation based on DFUC2022 Dataset

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In order to increase the segmentation impact of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Challenge 2022 dataset, we train a selection of popular deep learning segmentation algorithms and improve training methods, such as adding Dice term to loss function, employing transfer learning and poly learning rate update strategy, etc., in this paper. Experiments show that our method is effective, we get a Dice score of 0.7045, which is better than the official baseline result of 0.6277. Moreover, we integrate the above segmentation models using four ensemble methods to evaluate segmentation performance, such as Averaging, Weighting, Voting, and Stacking. We observed that our proposed one-layer CNN stacking network exhibits superior segmentation performance (Dice score: 0.7142) compared to single CNN model and other three ensemble methods. Our performance surpasses the baseline result, placing us in the top 10 in the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Challenge 2022.

References

  1. H. Sun, P. Saeedi, S. Karuranga, 2022. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes research and clinical practice 183, 109119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D. G. Armstrong, A. J. M. Boulton, and S. A. Bus. 2017. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. New England Journal of Medicine 376, 24, 2367–2375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. K. Ogurtsova, S. Morbach, B. Haastert, 2021. Cumulative long-term recurrence of diabetic foot ulcers in two cohorts from centres in Germany and the Czech Republic. Diabetes research and clinical practice 172, 108621.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. E. Ghanassia, L. Villon, 2008. Long-term outcome and disability of diabetic patients hospitalized for diabetic foot ulcers: a 6.5-year follow-up study. Diabetes care 31, 7, 1288–1292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. B. Cassidy, N. D. Reeves, J. M. Pappachan, 2022. A cloud-based deep learning framework for remote detection of diabetic foot ulcers. IEEE Pervasive Computing 21, 2, 78–86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. Brown, B. Ploderer, L. S. D. Seng, 2017. MyFootCare: a mobile self-tracking tool to promote self-care amongst people with diabetic foot ulcers. Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 462–466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Kendrick, B. Cassidy, J. M. Pappachan, 2022. Translating clinical delineation of diabetic foot ulcers into machine interpretable segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.11618.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer and T. Brox. 2015. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, 234–241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L.-C. Chen, G. Papandreou, F. Schroff, 2017. Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.05587.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. L.-C. Chen, G. Papandreou, I. Kokkinos, 2017. Deeplab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 40, 4, 834–848.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. L.-C. Chen, Y. Zhu, G. Papandreou, 2018. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. European conference on computer vision, 801–818.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. O. Sagi and L. Rokach. 2018. Ensemble learning: A survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 8, 4, e1249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Y. Zheng, C. Li, X. Zhou, 2022. Application of transfer learning and ensemble learning in image-level classification for breast histopathology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.08311.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Rajaraman, F. Yang, G. Zamzmi, 2022. Deep ensemble learning for segmenting tuberculosis-consistent manifestations in chest radiographs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.06065.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Goyal, M. H. Yap, N. D. Reeves, 2017. Fully convolutional networks for diabetic foot ulcer segmentation. IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, 618–623.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. C. Wang, A. Mahbod, I. Ellinger, 2022. FUSeg: The foot ulcer segmentation challenge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.00414.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. A. Mahbod, R. Ecker, and I. Ellinger. 2021. Automatic foot ulcer segmentation using an ensemble of convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01408.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. R. Ribani and M. Marengoni. 2019. A survey of transfer learning for convolutional neural networks. SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images Tutorials, 47–57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. K. Li, J. Yin, Z. Lu, 2012. Multiclass boosting SVM using different texture features in HEp-2 cell staining pattern classification. International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 170–173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. A. Howard, M. Sandler, G. Chu, 2019. Searching for mobilenetv3. IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 1314–1324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 770–778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. J. Wang, K. Sun, T. Cheng, 2020. Deep high-resolution representation learning for visual recognition. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 43, 10, 3349–3364.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Ensemble Learning for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Segmentation based on DFUC2022 Dataset

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EITCE '22: Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering
      October 2022
      1999 pages
      ISBN:9781450397148
      DOI:10.1145/3573428

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 March 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate508of972submissions,52%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)33
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format