skip to main content
10.1145/3573834.3574514acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Event Recommendation Based on Heterogeneous Social Network Information and Time Information

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 January 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, event-based social networks have developed rapidly, and event recommendation has attracted more and more attention. At present, for event recommendation, it is centered on the event, and aims to help users get the events which they are interested in from a large number of events. However, compared with traditional recommendation problems, event recommendation has many challenges. First of all, there is no obvious explicit rating of users’ response to events, but implicit feedback. Secondly, the recommendation of events has heterogeneous social network relations. At the same time, most users participate in few events, which leads to a very serious data sparsity problem. In order to address these challenges and improve the effectiveness of event recommendation, this paper proposes an event recommendation model that integrates users’ online and offline heterogeneous social network information and time information. The model uses Bayesian personalized ranking as the framework to process the implicit feedback information of users and events, and simultaneously combines online and offline social network information and time information to model together to improve the accuracy of recommendation. Experimental results based on real data sets show that the performance of the proposed model is better than other methods.

References

  1. Y. Cheng, Y. Yuan, L. Chen, C. Giraud-Carrier, and B. Li. 2019. Event-Participant and Incremental Planning over Event-Based Social Networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering PP, 99(2019), 1–1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. S. Choudhury, S. N. Mohanty, and A. K. Jagadev. 2021. Multimodal trust based recommender system with machine learning approaches for movie recommendation. International Journal of Information Technology 13, 2(2021), 475–482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. D. Cohen, M. Aharon, Y. Koren, O. Somekh, and R. Nissim. 2017. Expediting Exploration by Attribute-to-Feature Mapping for Cold-Start Recommendations. ACM (2017), 184–192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. T. Eftimov, B. Paudel, G. Popovski, and D. Kocev. 2021. AFramework for Evaluating Personalized Ranking Systems by Fusing Different Evaluation Measures. Big Data Research25-(2021), 25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Feng, Z. Xia, X. Feng, and J. Peng. 2021. RBPR: A hybrid model for the new user cold start problem in recommender systems. Knowledge-Based Systems 214, 6 (2021), 106732.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. W. Guo, W. Shu, W. Liang, and T. Tan. 2015. Multiple Attribute Aware Personalized Ranking. Springer, Cham (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. W. Guo, S. Wu, L. Wang, and T. Tan. 2016. Personalized ranking with pairwise Factorization Machines. Neurocomputing 214, nov.19 (2016), 191–200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. Hong, A. S. Doumith, and B. D. Davison. 2013. Co-Factorization Machines: Modeling User Interests and Predicting Individual Decisions in Twitter. In Sixth Acm International Conference on Web Search & Data Mining.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. X. Huang, G. Liao, N. Xiong, Athanasios V. Vasilakos, and T. Lan. 2020. A Survey of Context-Aware Recommendation Schemes in Event-Based Social Networks. Electronics 9(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Guangli Li, Jianwu Zhuo, Chuanxiu Li, Jin Hua, and Hongbin Zhang. 2021. Multi-modal Visual Adversarial Bayesian Personalized Ranking Model for Recommendation. Information Sciences 572, 1 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. B. Liu, Y. Fu, Z. Yao, and X. Hui. 2013. Learning geographical preferences for point-of-interest recommendation. In Acm Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Liu and Z. He. 2022. DLIR: a deep learning-based initialization recommendation algorithm for trust-aware recommendation. Applied Intelligence(2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Mandal and A. Maiti. 2020. Explicit feedback meet with implicit feedback in GPMF: a generalized probabilistic matrix factorization model for recommendation. Applied Intelligence 50, 10 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. X. Mao, S. Mitra, and V. Swaminathan. 2018. Feature Selection for FM-Based Context-Aware Recommendation Systems. In IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. I. E. Olatunji, X. Li, and W. Lam. 2020. Context-aware Helpfulness Prediction for Online Product Reviews.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Parmentier and R. Cohen. 2020. Personalized Multi-Faceted Trust Modeling in Social Networks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Z. Qiao, P. Zhang, Y. Cao, C. Zhou, and B. Fang. 2014. Combining heterogenous social and geographical information for event recommendation. AAAI Press (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Sengathir, MD Priya, Acj Malar, G. Aishwaryalakshmi, and S. Priyadharshini. 2020. Bayesian Personalized Ranking-Based Rank Prediction Scheme (BPR-RPS). 2nd EAI International Conference on Big Data Innovation for Sustainable Cognitive Computing, BDCC 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Wang, W. Zheng, C. Li, K. Zhao, and C. Hong. 2016. Learn to Recommend Local Event Using Heterogeneous Social Networks. In Asia-Pacific Web Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhenhua Wang, Ping He, Lidan Shou, Ke Chen, and Gang Chen. 2015. Toward the New Item Problem: Context-Enhanced Event Recommendation in Event-Based Social Networks. Springer International Publishing(2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. M. Xu and S. Liu. 2019. Semantic-Enhanced and Context-Aware Hybrid Collaborative Filtering for Event Recommendation in Event-Based Social Networks. IEEE Access 7(2019), 17493–17502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. E. Yang, Y. Huang, F. Liang, W. Pan, and Z. Ming. 2021. FCMF: Federated collective matrix factorization for heterogeneous collaborative filtering. Knowledge-Based Systems 220, 1/2 (2021), 106946.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. W. Zhang, F. Liu, D. Xu, and L. Jiang. 2019. Recommendation system in social networks with topical attention and probabilistic matrix factorization. PLOS ONE 14(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. C. Zhao, H. Wang, Y. Li, and K. Mu. 2019. Combining Meta-Graph and Attention for Recommendation over Heterogenous Information Network. International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Event Recommendation Based on Heterogeneous Social Network Information and Time Information

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AISS '22: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advanced Information Science and System
      November 2022
      396 pages
      ISBN:9781450397933
      DOI:10.1145/3573834

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 January 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate41of95submissions,43%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format