skip to main content
10.1145/3574198.3574202acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbbeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multi-modal Brain Image Segmentation Based on Multi-Encoder with Hybrid Lateral Connection (MEHLC-Net)

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The imaging data of Multi-modal brain has been put to a wide use in the identification of epilepsy and tumor lesions because it can provide multi-information about a target (epilepsy lesion, tumor, or tissue). However, most of the existing multi-modal medical image segmentation networks in the existing multi-modal segmentation schemes, on the one hand, adopt the input-level fusion strategy, which directly integrates the multi-modal images in the original input space. But it is hard to preserve the modality-specific properties. On the other hand, the decision-level fusion method with the use of the single network can better exploit the unique information of the corresponding modality, but with the problem that the features learned from a single modality cannot be easily combined with the features of other modality. In this paper, we have proposed Multi-Encoder with Hybrid Lateral Connection Network (MEHLC-Net), a semantic segmentation network based on 2D images with multi encoder structure for multi-modal MRI tumor sub-region segmentation. We use hybrid lateral connections instead of long connections in the U-Net structure to extract features, which can overcome the difficulty of highorder feature fusion caused by multiple encoders. We combine cross-connection with self-attention mechanisms to enhance the accuracy of the network. We evaluate our method on the multimodal data set of BRATS. Compared with the advanced No-New-Net, our model improves the TC of the DSC indicator by 0.13% and the ET indicator by 0.58% respectively.

References

  1. Zhao X, Zhang L, Lu H. Automatic polyp segmentation via multi-scale subtraction network[C]//International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, Cham, 2021: 120-130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Zheng H, Qin Y, Gu Y, Refined Local-imbalance-based Weight for Airway Segmentation in CT[C]//International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, Cham, 2021: 410-419.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen H, Dou Q, Yu L, VoxResNet: Deep voxelwise residual networks for brain segmentation from 3D MR images[J]. NeuroImage, 2018, 170: 446-455.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Moeskops P, Viergever M A, Mendrik A M, Automatic segmentation of MR brain images with a convolutional neural network[J]. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2016, 35(5): 1252-1261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jiang Z, Ding C, Liu M, Two-stage cascaded u-net: 1st place solution to brats challenge 2019 segmentation task[C]//International MICCAI brainlesion workshop. Springer, Cham, 2019: 231-241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhou T, Ruan S, Canu S. A review: Deep learning for medical image segmentation using multi-modality fusion[J]. Array, 2019, 3: 100004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Isensee F, Petersen J, Klein A, nnu-net: Self-adapting framework for u-net-based medical image segmentation[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.10486, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation[C]//International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Cham, 2015: 234-241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dolz J, Gopinath K, Yuan J, HyperDense-Net: a hyper-densely connected CNN for multi-modal image segmentation[J]. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2018, 38(5): 1116-1126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kumar A, Fulham M, Feng D, Co-learning feature fusion maps from PET-CT images of lung cancer[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2019, 39(1): 204-217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Moe Y M, Groendahl A R, Mulstad M, Deep learning for automatic tumour segmentation in PET/CT images of patients with head and neck cancers[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.00841, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, Densely connected convolutional networks[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2017: 4700-4708.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu J, Shen L, Sun G. Squeeze-and-excitation networks[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2018: 7132-7141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin T Y, Dollár P, Girshick R, Feature pyramid networks for object detection[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2017: 2117-2125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Menze B H, Jakab A, Bauer S, The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS)[J]. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2014, 34(10): 1993-2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Bakas S, Akbari H, Sotiras A, Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features[J]. Scientific data, 2017, 4(1): 1-13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Bakas S, Reyes M, Jakab A, Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the BRATS challenge[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.02629, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S. Bakas, H. Akbari, A. Sotiras , “Segmentation labels for the pre-operative scans of the tcga-gbm collection. the cancer imaging archive,” 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Bakas, H. Akbari, A. Sotiras, M. Bilello, M. Rozycki, J. Kirby, J. Freymann, K. Farahani, and C. Davatzikos, “Segmentation labels for the pre-operative scans of the tcga-gbm collection (2017),” 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2016: 770-778.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jia H, Xia Y, Cai W, Learning high-resolution and efficient non-local features for brain glioma segmentation in MR images[C]//International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, Cham, 2020: 480-490.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Myronenko A. 3D MRI brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularization[C]//International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop. Springer, Cham, 2018: 311-320.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Multi-modal Brain Image Segmentation Based on Multi-Encoder with Hybrid Lateral Connection (MEHLC-Net)

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICBBE '22: Proceedings of the 2022 9th International Conference on Biomedical and Bioinformatics Engineering
        November 2022
        306 pages
        ISBN:9781450397223
        DOI:10.1145/3574198

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 March 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)40
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format