skip to main content
10.1145/3574198.3574217acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbbeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cardiac Anomaly Detection using Embedded Attractors Reconstructed from Multichannel ECG

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The degree of complexity associated with the dynamics of the human heart is different for different categories of cardiac abnormalities. A quantitative measure of the complexities associated with cardiac dynamics can be obtained with a nonlinear study like a Multifractal analysis of the electrocardiogram signals. Here in this work, we have modeled the heart as a nonlinear dynamical system and obtained its phase space structure or embedded attractor reconstructed out of the ECG time series corresponding to four channels. Then, studied the multifractal behavior of the embedded attractor in order to quantify the degree of complexities associated with the dynamics of the heart. In particular, we have derived a few parameters out of the multifractal singularity spectrum and used them as a discriminative measure between various kinds of cardiac conditions. We have demonstrated a gradient boosting-based parametric classification model to discriminate between different kinds of arrhythmias and normal sinus rhythms. This work achieves considerably high accuracy in classifying different variants of cardiac disorders when trained with the parameters obtained from the multifractal singularity spectrum associated with the embedded attractor reconstructed out of the ECG time series.

References

  1. D. J. Christini, K. M. Stein, S. M. Markowitz, S. Mittal, D. J. Slotwiner and B. B. Lerman. 1999. The role of nonlinear dynamics in cardiac arrhythmia control. In Heart Dis.1(4), pp. 190-200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, C., Jin, Y., Lo, I. L., Zhao, H., Sun, B., Zhao, Q., Zheng, J., and Zhang, X. D. 2017. Complexity Change in Cardiovascular Disease. In International Journal of biological sciences, Vol. 13(10), pp. 1320–1328. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.19462Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wang, J., Ning, X. and Chen, Y. 2003. Multifractal analysis of electrocardiogram taken from healthy and unhealthy adult subjects. In Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 323, 561–568Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Trine Krogh-Madsen and David J. Christini. 2012. Nonlinear Dynamics in Cardiology. In Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 14, 179-203. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150106Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Nayak SK, Bit A, Dey A, Mohapatra B, Pal K. 2018. A Review on the Nonlinear Dynamical System Analysis of Electrocardiogram Signal. In Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2018:6920420. doi: 10.1155/2018/6920420Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Karma, A. 2013. Physics of cardiac arrhythmogenesis. In Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4, 313–337Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kantelhardt, J.W. 2012. Fractal and Multifractal Time Series. In Meyers, R. (eds) Mathematics of Complexity and Dynamical Systems. Springer, New York, NY. 463–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1806-130Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Webster, J. G. 2009. Medical Instrumentation: Application And Design, 3rd edn,. In John Wiley & SonsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Helen Mary Mercy Cleetus, Dilbag Singh. 2014. Multifractal application on electrocardiogram. In Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 38:1, 55-61 https://doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2013.849298Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Easwaramoorthy, D., and Uthayakumar, R. 2010. Analysis of biomedical EEG signals using Wavelet Transforms and Multifractal Analysis. In IEEE International Conference for Communication Control and Computing Technologies, Ramanathapuram, India, 544–549Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Diosdado, A.M. 2009. Analysis of the Relation between Complexity and Multifractality in Cardiac Interbeat Intervals Time Series. In D¨ossel, O., Schlegel, W.C. (eds) World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Munich, Germany, IFMBE Proceedings, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 25/4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03882-%202%20399Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kurths, J. 1995. Quantitative analysis of heart rate variability. In Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 5, 88–94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ivanov, P. C. 1999. Multifractality in human heartbeat dynamics. In Nature, 399, 461–465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Rodriguez E, Lerma C, Echeverria JC, Alvarez-Ramirez J. 2008. ECG scaling properties of cardiac arrhythmias using detrended fluctuation analysis. In Physiol Meas. 29(11), 1255-1266. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/29/11/002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. R. Krishnam, S. Chatlapalli, H. Nazeran, E. Haltiwanger and Y. Pamula. 2005. Detrended Fluctuation Analysis: A Suitable Long-term Measure of HRV Signals in Children with Sleep Disordered Breathing. In IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference, 1174-1177, doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2005.1616632.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Amaral, L. A. N. 2001. Behavioral-independent features of complex heartbeat dynamics. In Physical Review Letters 86, 6026.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ana Gavrovska, Goran Zaji´c, Irini Reljin,and Branimir Reljin. 2013. Classification of Prolapsed Mitral Valve versus Healthy Heart from Phonocardiograms by Multifractal Analysis. In Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2013 (376152). doi:10.1155/2013/376152Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Daoming Zhang and Cong Wang and Chuangye Li and Weizhong Dai. 2019. Multi-fractal detrended fluctuation half-spectrum analysis of HRV. In The Journal of Engineering, 2019, 22, 8315 – 8318, DOI: 10.1049/joe.2019.1067.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. M. Aguilar Molina, R. I. Rojas Jim´enez, and A. Mu˜noz Diosdado. 2019. Multifractal analysis of ECG time series of stress tests in healthy subjects. In AIP Conference Proceedings 2090, 050001. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5095916Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dezhao Jiao, Zikuan Wang, Jin Li, Feilong Feng, Fengzhen Hou. 2020. The chaotic characteristics detection based on multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of the elderly 12-lead ECG signals. In Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 540,123234. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.123234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Timothy D. Sauer. Attractor reconstruction. In Scholarpedia, 1(10):1727. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1727.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Takens, F. 1981. Dynamical systems and turbulence,” in Lecture notes in mathematics 898, 366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Harikrishnan, K. P., Misra, R., Ambika, G. and Amritkar, R. E. 2009. Computing the multifractal spectrum from time series: an algorithmic approach. In Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 19, 043129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Shekatkar, S.M., Kotriwar, Y., Harikrishnan, K.P. 2017. Detecting abnormality in heart dynamics from multifractal analysis of ECG signals. In Sci Rep 7, 15127. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15498-zGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Zheng, J., Zhang, J., Danioko, S. 2020. A 12-lead electrocardiogram database for arrhythmia research covering more than 10,000 patients. In Sci Data 7, 48 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0386-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Zheng, J. 2019. A 12- lead electrocardiogram database for arrhythmia research covering more than 10,000 patients. In figshare, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4560497.v2 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Cardiac Anomaly Detection using Embedded Attractors Reconstructed from Multichannel ECG

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICBBE '22: Proceedings of the 2022 9th International Conference on Biomedical and Bioinformatics Engineering
      November 2022
      306 pages
      ISBN:9781450397223
      DOI:10.1145/3574198

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 March 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format