skip to main content
10.1145/3574198.3574218acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbbeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Machine Learning Classification of Non-Specifically Trained Muscle between Endurance and Power Athletes

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The variations in muscular contraction between endurance and power athletes have usually been evaluated from lower limb muscles. The aim of this study is to integrate the application of machine learning in automatically classifying the muscle performance recorded from upper limb muscle. Muscle contraction of bicep brachii was recorded based on the surface electromyography (sEMG) analysis. The evaluation of muscle performance consists of three main processing parts, i.e., pre-processing, feature extraction, and classification. EMG features were extracted from three types of domains: time domain (TD), frequency domain (FD), and time-frequency domain (TFD). For classification purposes, a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier was used, and the classification performance was analysed based on the classification accuracy. The best classification performance was observed from the feature set selected from sequential backward selection (SBS). This finding shows that it is possible to differentiate muscle performance from non-specifically trained muscle, which might be further related to the intrinsic properties of different groups of athletes.

References

  1. Flück, M., Kramer, M., Fitze, D. P., Kasper, S., Franchi, M. V. and Valdivieso, P. Cellular Aspects of Muscle Specialization Demonstrate Genotype – Phenotype Interaction Effects in Athletes. Frontiers in Physiology, 10, 526 (2019-May-08 2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Costill, D., Daniels, J., Evans, W., J. Fink, W., Krahenbuhl, G. and Saltin, B. Skeletal enzymes and fibre composition in male and female track athletes, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Weyerstraß, J., Stewart, K., Wesselius, A. and Zeegers, M. Nine genetic polymorphisms associated with power athlete status – A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 21, 2 (2018/02/01/ 2018), 213-220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Zawadowska, B., Majerczak, J., Semik, D., Karasiński, J., Kolodziejski, L., Kilarski, W., Duda, K. and Zoladz, J. Characteristics of myosin profile in human vastus lateralis muscle in relation to training background. Folia histochemica et cytobiologica / Polish Academy of Sciences, Polish Histochemical and Cytochemical Society, 42 (02/01 2004), 181-190.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Klaver-Król, E. G., Henriquez, N. R., Oosterloo, S. J., Klaver, P., Kuipers, H. and Zwarts, M. J. Distribution of motor unit potential velocities in the biceps brachii muscle of sprinters and endurance athletes during short static contractions at low force levels. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 20, 6 (2010/12/01/ 2010), 1107-1114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Trninić, V., Trninić, M. and Čavala, M. Influences of Genetic and Environmental Factors on the Development of Personality, Performance and Sports Achievement. Acta kinesiologica, 12, 1 (2018), 55-61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker, J., Young, B. W. and Mann, D. Advances in athlete development: understanding conditions of and constraints on optimal practice. Current Opinion in Psychology, 16 (2017/08/01/ 2017), 24-27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gawda, P., Ginszt, M., Ginszt, A., Pawlak, H. and Majcher, P. Differences in myoelectric manifestations of fatigue during isometric muscle actions. Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine: AAEM, 25, 2 (2018), 296-299.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Herda, T. J., Siedlik, J. A., Trevino, M. A., Cooper, M. A. and Weir, J. P. Motor unit control strategies of endurance- versus resistance-trained individuals. Muscle & Nerve, 52, 5 (2015), 832-843.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Huber, C., Göpfert, B., Kugler, P. F.-X. and Von Tscharner, V. The effect of sprint and endurance training on electromyogram signal analysis by wavelets. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 24, 6 (2010), 1527-1536.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Rainoldi, A., Gazzoni, M. and Melchiorri, G. Differences in myoelectric manifestations of fatigue in sprinters and long distance runners. Physiological Measurement, 29, 3 (2008), 331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Dhindsa, I., Agarwal, R. and Ryait, H. Performance evaluation of various classifiers for predicting knee angle from electromyography signals. Expert Systems, 36 (06/01 2019), e12381.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Phinyomark, A., Quaine, F., Charbonnier, S., Serviere, C., Tarpin-Bernard, F. and Laurillau, Y. EMG feature evaluation for improving myoelectric pattern recognition robustness. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 12 (2013/09/15/ 2013), 4832-4840.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Waris, A. and Kamavuako, E. N. Effect of threshold values on the combination of EMG time domain features: Surface versus intramuscular EMG. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 45 (2018/08/01/ 2018), 267-273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Yang, C., Xi, X., Chen, S., Miran, S. M., Hua, X. and Luo, Z. SEMG-based multifeatures and predictive model for knee-joint-angle estimation. AIP Advances, 9, 9 (2019), 095042.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Phinyomark, A., R, N. K. and Scheme, E. Feature Extraction and Selection for Myoelectric Control Based on Wearable EMG Sensors. Sensors (Basel), 18, 5 (May 18 2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Abbaspour, S., Lindén, M., Gholamhosseini, H., Naber, A. and Ortiz-Catalan, M. Evaluation of surface EMG-based recognition algorithms for decoding hand movements. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 58, 1 (2020/01/01 2020), 83-100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Bohari, Z. H., Jali, M., Baharom, F., Mohd Nasir, M. N. i., Jaafar, H. I. and Wan Daud, W. M. B. EMG signal statistical features extraction combination performance benchmark using unsupervised neural network for arm rehab device. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 9 (01/01 2014), 12393-12402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Triwiyanto, Wahyunggoro, O., Nugroho, H. A. and Herianto Effect of window length on performance of the elbow-joint angle prediction based on electromyography. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 853 (2017/05 2017), 012014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Ashraf, H., Waris, A., Jamil, M., Gilani, S. O., Niazi, I. K., Kamavuako, E. N. and Gilani, S. H. N. Determination of Optimum Segmentation Schemes for Pattern Recognition-Based Myoelectric Control: A Multi-Dataset Investigation. IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 90862-90877.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hassan, H. F., Abou-Loukh, S. J. and Ibraheem, I. K. Teleoperated robotic arm movement using electromyography signal with wearable Myo armband. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 32, 6 (2020/09/01/ 2019), 378-387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Wahid, M. F., Tafreshi, R., Al-Sowaidi, M. and Langari, R. Subject-independent hand gesture recognition using normalization and machine learning algorithms. Journal of Computational Science, 27 (2018/07/01/ 2018), 69-76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Islam, A. and Alam, M. Classification of Electromyography Signals Using Support Vector Machine (01/01 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Machine Learning Classification of Non-Specifically Trained Muscle between Endurance and Power Athletes

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICBBE '22: Proceedings of the 2022 9th International Conference on Biomedical and Bioinformatics Engineering
        November 2022
        306 pages
        ISBN:9781450397223
        DOI:10.1145/3574198

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 March 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format