skip to main content
research-article

A Survey on Soft Computing Techniques for Federated Learning- Applications, Challenges and Future Directions

Published:22 June 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Federated Learning is a distributed, privacy-preserving machine learning model that is gaining more attention these days. Federated Learning has a vast number of applications in different fields. While being more popular, it also suffers some drawbacks like high communication costs, privacy concerns, and data management issues. In this survey, we define federated learning systems and analyse the system to ensure a smooth flow and to guide future research with the help of soft computing techniques. We undertake a complete review of aggregating federated learning systems with soft computing techniques. We also investigate the impacts of collaborating various nature-inspired techniques with federated learning to alleviate its flaws. Finally, this paper discusses the possible future developments of integrating federated learning and soft computing techniques.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Bonawitz Keith, Eichner Hubert, Grieskamp Wolfgang, Huba Dzmitry, Ingerman Alex, Ivanov Vladimir, Kiddon Chloe, Konečnỳ Jakub, Mazzocchi Stefano, McMahan H. Brendan, et al. 2019. Towards federated learning at scale: System design. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.01046 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] Bi Qifang, Goodman Katherine E., Kaminsky Joshua, and Lessler Justin. 2019. What is machine learning? A primer for the epidemiologist. American Journal of Epidemiology 188, 12 (2019), 22222239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3] Yang Qiang, Liu Yang, Chen Tianjian, and Tong Yongxin. 2019. Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 10, 2 (2019), 119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. [4] Mothukuri Viraaji, Parizi Reza, Pouriyeh Seyedamin, Huang Yan, Dehghantanha Ali, and Srivastava Gautam. 2020. A survey on security and privacy of federated learning. Future Generation Computer Systems (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5] Mammen Priyanka Mary. 2021. Federated learning: Opportunities and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.05428 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [6] Konečnỳ Jakub, McMahan H Brendan, Yu Felix X., Richtárik Peter, Suresh Ananda Theertha, and Bacon Dave. 2016. Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05492 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7] Xu Jie, Glicksberg Benjamin S., Su Chang, Walker Peter, Bian Jiang, and Wang Fei. 2021. Federated learning for healthcare informatics. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research 5, 1 (2021), 119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. [8] Rahman Sawsan Abdul, Tout Hanine, Talhi Chamseddine, and Mourad Azzam. 2020. Internet of things intrusion detection: Centralized, on-device, or federated learning? IEEE Network 34, 6 (2020), 310317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. [9] Pokhrel Shiva Raj and Choi Jinho. 2020. Federated learning with blockchain for autonomous vehicles: Analysis and design challenges. IEEE Transactions on Communications 68, 8 (2020), 47344746.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Li Qinbin, Wen Zeyi, Wu Zhaomin, Hu Sixu, Wang Naibo, Li Yuan, Liu Xu, and He Bingsheng. 2021. A survey on federated learning systems: Vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [11] Truex Stacey, Baracaldo Nathalie, Anwar Ali, Steinke Thomas, Ludwig Heiko, Zhang Rui, and Zhou Yi. 2019. A hybrid approach to privacy-preserving federated learning. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security. 111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. [12] Geyer Robin C., Klein Tassilo, and Nabi Moin. 2018. Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspective. (2018). arxiv:cs.CR/1712.07557Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] Xu Runhua, Baracaldo Nathalie, Zhou Yi, Anwar Ali, and Ludwig Heiko. 2019. HybridAlpha: An efficient approach for privacy-preserving federated learning. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security. 1323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. [14] Asad Muhammad, Moustafa Ahmed, Ito Takayuki, and Aslam Muhammad. 2021. Evaluating the communication efficiency in federated learning algorithms. In 2021 IEEE 24th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD). 552557. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] Chen Mingzhe, Shlezinger Nir, Poor H. Vincent, Eldar Yonina C., and Cui Shuguang. 2021. Communication-efficient federated learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 17 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. [16] Liu Su, Yu Jiong, Deng Xiaoheng, and Wan Shaohua. 2021. FedCPF: An efficient-communication federated learning approach for vehicular edge computing in 6G communication networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2021), 114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. [17] Wang Luping, Wang Wei, and Li Bo. 2019. CMFL: Mitigating communication overhead for federated learning. In 2019 IEEE 39th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS). 954964. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Chandana Pusuluru Hari. 2019. A survey on soft computing techniques and applications. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 6, 4 (2019), 12581266.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. [19] Sharafati Ahmad, Haghbin Masoud, Motta Davide, and Yaseen Zaher Mundher. 2021. The application of soft computing models and empirical formulations for hydraulic structure scouring depth simulation: A comprehensive review, assessment and possible future research direction. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 28, 2 (2021), 423447.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [20] Phonsa Gurbakash and Bansal Kapil Kumar. 2018. A comprehensive review of soft computing techniques. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research 13, 11 (2018), 98819886.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. [21] Das Santosh Kumar, Kumar Abhishek, Das Bappaditya, Burnwal A. P., et al. 2013. On soft computing techniques in various areas. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 3, 59 (2013), 166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. [22] Kumar Manoj, Misra Lata, and Shekhar G. A.. 2015. Survey in fuzzy logic: An introduction. Int. J. Sci. Res. Dev. 3, 6 (2015), 822824.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. [23] Lin Yuan-Horng and Wu Berlin. 2006. Fuzzy mode and its applications in survey research. In Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Mathematics. 286291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. [24] Ropero Jorge, Leon Carlos, Carrasco Alejandro, Gomez Ariel, and Rivera Octavio. 2011. Fuzzy logic applications for knowledge discovery: A survey. International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology 3, 6 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25] Ghosh S., Razouqi Q., Schumacher H. J., and Celmins A.. 1998. A survey of recent advances in fuzzy logic in telecommunications networks and new challenges. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 6, 3 (1998), 443447. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. [26] Precup Radu-Emil and Hellendoorn Hans. 2011. A survey on industrial applications of fuzzy control. Computers in Industry 62, 3 (2011), 213226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. [27] Yang Xin-She. 2020. Nature-inspired Optimization Algorithms. Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28] Selvaraj Cholavendhan, Kumar R. Siva, and Karnan M.. 2014. A survey on application of bio-inspired algorithms. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies 5, 1 (2014), 366370.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. [29] Binitha S., Sathya S. Siva, et al. 2012. A survey of bio inspired optimization algorithms. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering 2, 2 (2012), 137151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. [30] Li Tian, Sahu Anit Kumar, Talwalkar Ameet, and Smith Virginia. 2020. Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 37, 3 (2020), 5060.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Lyu Lingjuan, Yu Han, and Yang Qiang. 2020. Threats to federated learning: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.02133 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. [32] Han Song, Mao Huizi, and Dally William J.. 2015. Deep compression: Compressing deep neural networks with pruning, trained quantization and Huffman coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.00149 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] Chen Yang, Sun Xiaoyan, and Jin Yaochu. 2020. Communication-efficient federated deep learning with layerwise asynchronous model update and temporally weighted aggregation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 31, 10 (Oct.2020), 42294238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. [34] Zhu Hangyu and Jin Yaochu. 2019. Multi-objective Evolutionary Federated Learning. (2019). arxiv:cs.LG/1812.07478Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. [35] Jordan Michael I. and Mitchell Tom M.. 2015. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349, 6245 (2015), 255260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. [36] Bhattacharya Sweta, Somayaji Siva Rama Krishnan, Gadekallu Thippa Reddy, Alazab Mamoun, and Maddikunta Praveen Kumar Reddy. 2020. A review on deep learning for future smart cities. Internet Technology Letters n/a, n/a (2020), e187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. [37] Verbraeken Joost, Wolting Matthijs, Katzy Jonathan, Kloppenburg Jeroen, Verbelen Tim, and Rellermeyer Jan S.. 2019. A survey on distributed machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.09789 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. [38] Wu Xinxing, Zhang Junping, and Wang Fei-Yue. 2020. Stability-based generalization analysis of distributed learning algorithms for big data. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 31, 3 (2020), 801812.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. [39] Peteiro-Barral Diego and Guijarro-Berdiñas Bertha. 2013. A survey of methods for distributed machine learning. Progress in Artificial Intelligence 2, 1 (2013), 111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. [40] Zhang Jingjing and Simeone Osvaldo. 2020. LAGC: Lazily aggregated gradient coding for straggler-tolerant and communication-efficient distributed learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.09148 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. [41] Xing Eric P., Ho Qirong, Xie Pengtao, and Wei Dai. 2016. Strategies and principles of distributed machine learning on big data. Engineering 2, 2 (2016), 179195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. [42] Rossi Michele, Centenaro Marco, Ba Aly, Eleuch Salma, Erseghe Tomaso, and Zorzi Michele. 2020. Distributed learning algorithms for optimal data routing in IoT networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks 6 (2020), 179195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. [43] Zhang Chen, Xie Yu, Bai Hang, Yu Bin, Li Weihong, and Gao Yuan. 2021. A survey on federated learning. Knowledge-Based Systems 216 (2021), 106775.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. [44] Zhan Yufeng, Li Peng, Qu Zhihao, Zeng Deze, and Guo Song. 2020. A learning-based incentive mechanism for federated learning. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 7, 7 (2020), 63606368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. [45] Ahmed Usman, Srivastava Gautam, and Lin Jerry Chun-Wei. 2022. Reliable customer analysis using federated learning and exploring deep-attention edge intelligence. Future Generation Computer Systems 127 (2022), 7079.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. [46] Ahmed Usman, Srivastava Gautam, and Lin Jerry Chun-Wei. 2021. A federated learning approach to frequent itemset mining in cyber-physical systems. Journal of Network and Systems Management 29, 4 (2021), 117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. [47] Ahmed Usman, Lin Jerry Chun-Wei, and Srivastava Gautam. 2022. Hyper-graph attention based federated learning method for mental health detection. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. [48] Wei Kang, Li Jun, Ding Ming, Ma Chuan, Yang Howard H., Farokhi Farhad, Jin Shi, Quek Tony Q. S., and Poor H. Vincent. 2020. Federated learning with differential privacy: Algorithms and performance analysis. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 15 (2020), 34543469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. [49] Abdulrahman Sawsan, Tout Hanine, Ould-Slimane Hakima, Mourad Azzam, Talhi Chamseddine, and Guizani Mohsen. 2020. A survey on federated learning: The journey from centralized to distributed on-site learning and beyond. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 8, 7 (2020), 54765497.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. [50] Boopalan Parimala, Ramu Swarna Priya, Pham Quoc-Viet, Dev Kapal, Maddikunta Praveen Kumar Reddy, Gadekallu Thippa Reddy, Huynh-The Thien, et al. 2022. Fusion of federated learning and industrial internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks (2022), 109048.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. [51] Yang Qiang, Liu Yang, Chen Tianjian, and Tong Yongxin. 2019. Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 10, 2 (2019), 119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. [52] Chen Mingqing, Mathews Rajiv, Ouyang Tom, and Beaufays Françoise. 2019. Federated learning of out-of-vocabulary words. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.10635 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. [53] Aliev Rafik Aziz ogly and Aliev Rashad Rafik. 2001. Soft Computing and Its Applications. World Scientific.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. [54] Chakraverty Snehashish, Sahoo Deepti Moyi, and Mahato Nisha Rani. 2019. Concepts of Soft Computing. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. [55] Ovaska Seppo J., VanLandingham Hugh F., and Kamiya Akimoto. 2002. Fusion of soft computing and hard computing in industrial applications: An overview. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 32, 2 (2002), 7279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. [56] Ibrahim Dogan. 2016. An overview of soft computing. Procedia Computer Science 102 (2016), 3438.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. [57] Montero Javier. 2009. Fuzzy logic and science. In Views on Fuzzy Sets and Systems from Different Perspectives. Springer, 6777.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. [58] SS Vinod Chandra and HS Anand. 2022. Nature inspired meta heuristic algorithms for optimization problems. Computing 104, 2 (2022), 251269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. [59] Uniyal Nitin, Pant Sangeeta, Kumar Anuj, and Pant Prashant. 2022. Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms for optimization. Meta-heuristic Optimization Techniques: Applications in Engineering 10 (2022), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. [60] İnkaya Tülin, Kayalıgil Sinan, and Özdemirel Nur Evin. 2015. Ant colony optimization based clustering methodology. Applied Soft Computing 28 (2015), 301311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. [61] Abaci Kadir, Yamacli Volkan, and Akdğli Ali̇. 2016. Optimal power flow with SVC devices by using the artificial bee colony algorithm. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences 24, 1 (2016), 341353.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. [62] Wright Alden H.. 1991. Genetic algorithms for real parameter optimization. In Foundations of Genetic Algorithms. Vol. 1. Elsevier, 205218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. [63] Agarwal Parul and Mehta Shikha. 2014. Nature-inspired algorithms: State-of-art, problems and prospects. International Journal of Computer Applications 100, 14 (2014), 1421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. [64] Silva Ivan Nunes Da, Spatti Danilo Hernane, Flauzino Rogerio Andrade, Liboni Luisa Helena Bartocci, and Alves Silas Franco dos Reis. 2017. Artificial neural networks. Cham: Springer International Publishing 39 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. [65] Walczak Steven. 2018. Artificial neural networks. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fourth Edition. IGI Global, 120131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. [66] White Halbert. 1989. Learning in artificial neural networks: A statistical perspective. Neural Computation 1, 4 (1989), 425464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. [67] Basheer I. A. and Hajmeer M.. 2000. Artificial neural networks: Fundamentals, computing, design, and application. Journal of Microbiological Methods 43, 1 (2000), 331. DOI:Neural Computing in Microbiology.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. [68] Abiodun Oludare Isaac, Jantan Aman, Omolara Abiodun Esther, Dada Kemi Victoria, Mohamed Nachaat AbdElatif, and Arshad Humaira. 2018. State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: A survey. Heliyon 4, 11 (2018), e00938. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. [69] Wu Yu-chen and Feng Jun-wen. 2018. Development and application of artificial neural network. Wireless Personal Communications 102, 2 (2018), 16451656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. [70] Kukreja Harsh, Bharath N., Siddesh C. S., and Kuldeep S.. 2016. An introduction to artificial neural network. Int. J. Adv. Res. Innov. Ideas Educ. 1 (2016), 2730.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. [71] Tang W. H. and Wu Q. H.. 2011. Evolutionary computation. In Condition Monitoring and Assessment of Power Transformers Using Computational Intelligence. Springer, 1536.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. [72] Eiben Agoston E. and Smith Jim. 2015. From evolutionary computation to the evolution of things. Nature 521, 7553 (2015), 476482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. [73] Jong Kenneth De. 2016. Evolutionary computation: A unified approach. In Proceedings of the 2016 on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion. 185199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. [74] Grime J. Philip and Pierce Simon. 2012. The Evolutionary Strategies that Shape Ecosystems. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. [75] Koza John R. and Poli Riccardo. 2005. Genetic programming. In Search Methodologies. Springer, 127164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. [76] Cheng Shi, Ma Lianbo, Lu Hui, Lei Xiujuan, and Shi Yuhui. 2021. Evolutionary computation for solving search-based data analytics problems. Artificial Intelligence Review 54, 2 (2021), 13211348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. [77] Ghosh Ashish and Tsutsui Shigeyoshi. 2012. Advances in Evolutionary Computing: Theory and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. [78] Zhao Tian-Fang, Chen Wei-Neng, Ma Xin-Xin, and Wu Xiao-Kun. 2021. Evolutionary computation in social propagation over complex networks: A survey. International Journal of Automation and Computing (2021), 118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. [79] Alvarez Pavel Anselmo, Ishizaka Alessio, and Mart ınez Luis. 2021. Multiple-criteria decision-making sorting methods: A survey. Expert Systems with Applications 183 (2021), 115368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. [80] Bonissone P., Subbu Raj, and Lizzi John. 2009. Multicriteria decision making (MCDM): A framework for research and applications. Computational Intelligence Magazine, IEEE 4 (092009), 4861. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. [81] Zavadskas Edmundas Kazimieras, Turskis Zenonas, and Kildienė Simona. 2014. State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 20, 1 (2014), 165179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. [82] Aruldoss Martin, Lakshmi T. Miranda, and Venkatesan V. Prasanna. 2013. A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. American Journal of Information Systems 1, 1 (2013), 3143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. [83] Lau Henry, Tsang Yung Po, Nakandala Dilupa, and Lee Carman K. M.. 2021. Risk quantification in cold chain management: A federated learning-enabled multi-criteria decision-making methodology. Industrial Management & Data Systems (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. [84] Tan Tan, Mills Grant, Papadonikolaki Eleni, and Liu Zhening. 2021. Combining multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods with building information modelling (BIM): A review. Automation in Construction 121 (2021), 103451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. [85] Wen Zhi, Liao Huchang, Zavadskas Edmundas Kazimieras, and Antuchevičienė Jurgita. 2021. Applications of fuzzy multiple criteria decision making methods in civil engineering: A state-of-the-art survey. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 27, 6 (2021), 358371.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. [86] Alazab Mamoun, RM Swarna Priya, Parimala M., Maddikunta Praveen Kumar Reddy, Gadekallu Thippa Reddy, and Pham Quoc-Viet. 2021. Federated learning for cybersecurity: Concepts, challenges, and future directions. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 18, 5 (2021), 35013509.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. [87] Ramu Swarna Priya, Boopalan Parimala, Pham Quoc-Viet, Maddikunta Praveen Kumar Reddy, Huynh-The Thien, Alazab Mamoun, Nguyen Thanh Thi, and Gadekallu Thippa Reddy. 2022. Federated learning enabled digital twins for smart cities: Concepts, recent advances, and future directions. Sustainable Cities and Society 79 (2022), 103663.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. [88] Javed Abdul Rehman, Hassan Muhammad Abul, Shahzad Faisal, Ahmed Waqas, Singh Saurabh, Baker Thar, and Gadekallu Thippa Reddy. 2022. Integration of blockchain technology and federated learning in vehicular (IoT) networks: A comprehensive survey. Sensors 22, 12 (2022), 4394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. [89] Zhu Hangyu, Zhang Haoyu, and Jin Yaochu. 2021. From federated learning to federated neural architecture search: A survey. Complex & Intelligent Systems 7, 2 (2021), 639657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. [90] Zhu Hangyu and Jin Yaochu. 2021. Real-time federated evolutionary neural architecture search. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. [91] Luo Yifan, Xu Jindan, Xu Wei, and Wang Kezhi. 2020. Sliding differential evolution scheduling for federated learning in bandwidth-limited networks. IEEE Communications Letters 25, 2 (2020), 503507.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. [92] Qolomany Basheer, Ahmad Kashif, Al-Fuqaha Ala, and Qadir Junaid. 2020. Particle Swarm Optimized Federated Learning For Industrial IoT and Smart City Services. (2020). arxiv:cs.LG/2009.02560Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. [93] Agrawal Shaashwat, Sarkar Sagnik, Alazab Mamoun, Maddikunta Praveen Kumar Reddy, Gadekallu Thippa Reddy, and Pham Quoc-Viet. 2021. Genetic CFL: Optimization of hyper-parameters in clustered federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.07233 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. [94] He Chaoyang, Balasubramanian Keshav, Ceyani Emir, Yang Carl, Xie Han, Sun Lichao, He Lifang, Yang Liangwei, Yu Philip S., Rong Yu, et al. 2021. FedGraphNN: A federated learning benchmark system for graph neural networks. In ICLR 2021 Workshop on Distributed and Private Machine Learning (DPML).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. [95] Gadekallu Thippa R. and Gao Xiao-Z.. 2021. An efficient attribute reduction and fuzzy logic classifier for heart disease and diabetes prediction. Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications (Formerly: Recent Patents on Computer Science) 14, 1 (2021), 158165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. [96] Połap Dawid. 2021. Fuzzy consensus with federated learning method in medical systems. IEEE Access 9 (2021), 150383150392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. [97] Yoo Eungeun, Ko Haneul, and Pack Sangheon. 2022. Fuzzy clustered federated learning algorithm for solar power generation forecasting. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. [98] Chhikara Prateek, Tekchandani Rajkumar, Kumar Neeraj, Guizani Mohsen, and Hassan Mohammad Mehedi. 2021. Federated learning and autonomous UAVs for hazardous zone detection and AQI prediction in IoT environment. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 8, 20 (2021), 1545615467.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  99. [99] Park Sunghwan, Suh Yeryoung, and Lee Jaewoo. 2021. FedPSO: Federated learning using particle swarm optimization to reduce communication costs. Sensors 21, 2 (2021), 600.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. [100] Xu Jinjin, Jin Yaochu, and Du Wenli. 2021. A federated data-driven evolutionary algorithm for expensive multi-/ many-objective optimization. Complex & Intelligent Systems 7, 6 (2021), 30933109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. [101] Konecný Jakub, McMahan H. B., Ramage Daniel, and Richtárik Peter. 2016. Federated optimization: Distributed machine learning for on-device intelligence. ArXiv abs/1610.02527 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. [102] Li Kaiju and Xiao Chunhua. 2021. CBFL: A communication-efficient federated learning framework from data redundancy perspective. IEEE Systems Journal (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. [103] Wang Chunnan, Chen Bozhou, Li Geng, and Wang Hongzhi. 2021. FL-AGCNS: Federated Learning Framework for Automatic Graph Convolutional Network Search. (2021). arxiv:cs.LG/2104.04141Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. [104] Tonellotto Nicola, Gotta Alberto, Nardini Franco Maria, Gadler Daniele, and Silvestri Fabrizio. 2021. Neural network quantization in federated learning at the edge. Information Sciences 575 (2021), 417436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  105. [105] Li Hongyu and Han Tianqi. 2019. An end-to-end encrypted neural network for gradient updates transmission in federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08340 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. [106] Repetto Marco, Torre Davide La, and Tariq Muhammad. 2022. Federated Deep Learning in Electricity Forecasting: An MCDM Approach. (2022). arxiv:math.OC/2111.13834Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. [107] Sarker Partha S., Sadanandan Sajan K., and Srivastava Anurag K.. 2021. Resiliency metrics for monitoring and analysis of cyber-power distribution system with IoTs. IEEE Access (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. [108] Wang Weizheng, Srivastava Gautam, Lin Jerry Chun-Wei, Yang Yaoqi, Alazab Mamoun, and Gadekallu Thippa Reddy. 2022. Data freshness optimization under CAA in the UAV-aided MECN: A potential game perspective. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. [109] Bhattacharya Sweta, Chengoden Rajeswari, Srivastava Gautam, Alazab Mamoun, Javed Abdul Rehman, Victor Nancy, Maddikunta Praveen Kumar Reddy, and Gadekallu Thippa Reddy. 2022. Incentive mechanisms for smart grid: State of the art, challenges, open issues, future directions. Big Data and Cognitive Computing 6, 2 (2022), 47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  110. [110] Zhu Ye, Liu Zhiqiang, Wang Peng, and Du Chenglie. 2022. A dynamic incentive and reputation mechanism for energy-efficient federated learning in 6G. Digital Communications and Networks (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. [111] Zhang Guojun, Malekmohammadi Saber, Chen Xi, and Yu Yaoliang. 2022. Equality is not equity: Proportional fairness in federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.01666 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. [112] Fan Zhenan, Fang Huang, Zhou Zirui, Pei Jian, Friedlander Michael P., and Zhang Yong. 2022. Fair and efficient contribution valuation for vertical federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.02658 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. [113] Wu Leijie. 2022. A coalition formation game approach for personalized federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.02502 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. [114] Zeng Rongfei, Zeng Chao, Wang Xingwei, Li Bo, and Chu Xiaowen. 2021. A comprehensive survey of incentive mechanism for federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.15406 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. [115] Asad Muhammad, Moustafa Ahmed, and Ito Takayuki. 2021. Federated learning versus classical machine learning: A convergence comparison. Authorea Preprints (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Survey on Soft Computing Techniques for Federated Learning- Applications, Challenges and Future Directions

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image Journal of Data and Information Quality
              Journal of Data and Information Quality  Volume 15, Issue 2
              June 2023
              363 pages
              ISSN:1936-1955
              EISSN:1936-1963
              DOI:10.1145/3605909
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 22 June 2023
              • Online AM: 30 January 2023
              • Accepted: 19 September 2022
              • Revised: 12 July 2022
              • Received: 14 March 2022
              Published in jdiq Volume 15, Issue 2

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            Full Text

            View this article in Full Text.

            View Full Text