skip to main content
10.1145/3575882.3575907acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic3inaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Detecting Disambiguation on Medical Abbreviations

Published:27 February 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The number of medical abbreviations in the world is due to the increasing number of diseases, technological advances in the medical field, research in the medical field, and the emergence of various drugs. A large number of medical abbreviations often have the same abbreviation but it has a different meaning. The similarity of these medical abbreviations often results in ambiguous abbreviations. The ambiguity of this abbreviation can be reduced by creating a system based on Artificial Intelligent (AI). In this paper, we have compared various models using Naive Bayes, LSTM, Logistic Regression, and SVM to get the best model for medical abbreviations disambiguation. The experimental results indicate that the highest model accuracy is obtained by LSTM model, which is at 97.21%.

References

  1. Skreta, M., Arbabi, A., Wang, J., & Brudno, M. (2020, April). Training without training data: Improving the generalizability of automated medical abbreviation disambiguation. In Machine Learning for Health Workshop (pp. 233-245). PMLR..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Holper, S., Barmanray, R., Colman, B., Yates, C. J., Liew, D., & Smallwood, D. (2020). Ambiguous medical abbreviation study: challenges and opportunities. Internal medicine journal, 50(9), 1073-1078..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Joopudi, V., Dandala, B., & Devarakonda, M. (2018). A convolutional route to abbreviation disambiguation in clinical text. Journal of biomedical informatics, 86, 71-78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Moon, S., Pakhomov, S., Liu, N., Ryan, J. O., & Melton, G. B. (2014). A sense inventory for clinical abbreviations and acronyms created using clinical notes and medical dictionary resources. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(2), 299-307.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Zweigenbaum, P., Deléger, L., Lavergne, T., Névéol, A., & Bodnari, A. (2013). A Supervised Abbreviation Resolution System for Medical Text. In CLEF (Working Notes).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi, E., Bahadori, M. T., Schuetz, A., Stewart, W. F., & Sun, J. (2016, December). Doctor ai: Predicting clinical events via recurrent neural networks. In Machine learning for healthcare conference (pp. 301-318). PMLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Vomlel, J., Kruzık, H., Tuma, P., Precek, J., & Hutyra, M. (2012). Machine learning methods for mortality prediction in patients with st elevation myocardial infarction. Proceedings of WUPES, 2012, 204-213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamet, P., & Tremblay, J. (2017). Artificial intelligence in medicine. Metabolism, 69, S36-S40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Berge, G. T., Granmo, O. C., Tveit, T. O., Goodwin, M., Jiao, L., & Matheussen, B. V. (2019). Using the Tsetlin Machine to learn human-interpretable rules for high-accuracy text categorization with medical applications. IEEE Access, 7, 115134-115146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Gaudan, S., Kirsch, H., & Rebholz-Schuhmann, D. (2005). Resolving abbreviations to their senses in Medline. Bioinformatics, 21(18), 3658-3664.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Stevenson, M., Guo, Y., Alamri, A., & Gaizauskas, R. (2009, June). Disambiguation of biomedical abbreviations. In Proceedings of the BioNLP 2009 Workshop (pp. 71-79).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Pakhomov, S. (2002, July). Semi-supervised maximum entropy based approach to acronym and abbreviation normalization in medical texts. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 160-167).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Zhang, H. (2004). The optimality of naive Bayes. Aa, 1(2), 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yao, Y., Liu, Y., Yu, Y., Xu, H., Lv, W., Li, Z., & Chen, X. (2013). K-SVM: An Effective SVM Algorithm Based on K-means Clustering. J. Comput., 8(10), 2632-2639.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Amini, M. R., & Gallinari, P. (2002, July). Semi-supervised logistic regression. In ECAI (Vol. 2, No. 4, p. 11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gonzalez, J., & Yu, W. (2018). Non-linear system modeling using LSTM neural networks. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(13), 485-489.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Wen, Z., Lu, X. H., & Reddy, S. (2020). MeDAL: Medical abbreviation disambiguation dataset for natural language understanding pretraining. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.13978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jadhav, S. D., & Channe, H. P. (2016). Comparative study of K-NN, naive Bayes and decision tree classification techniques. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 5(1), 1842-1845.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Al-Tahrawi, Mayy M. "Arabic text categorization using logistic regression."International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications7, no. 6 (2015): 71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Undhad, Payal R., and Dharmesh J. Bhalodiya. "Text Classification and Classifiers: A Comparative Study." In International conference on IJEDR, vol. 5. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Murthy, G. S. N., Shanmukha Rao Allu, Bhargavi Andhavarapu, Mounika Bagadi, and Mounika Belusonti. "Text based sentiment analysis using LSTM." Int. J. Eng. Res. Tech. Res 9, no. 05 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang, J., Li, Y., Tian, J., & Li, T. (2018, October). LSTM- CNN hybrid model for text classification. In 2018 IEEE 3rd Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC) (pp. 1675-1680). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IC3INA '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications
    November 2022
    415 pages
    ISBN:9781450397902
    DOI:10.1145/3575882

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 February 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format