skip to main content
10.1145/3575882.3575912acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic3inaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

SESS: Utilization of SPIN for Ethnomedicine Semantic Search

Published:27 February 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Indonesia has biodiversity which is very beneficial for human life. Existing applications for ethnomedicine have been developed using conventional methods that only utilized SPARQL Protocol and RDF Query Language (SPARQL), so they still have limitations in representing knowledge and its retrieval. Those conventional methods are which based of relational database and ontology that has not utilized inference in its query process. Therefore, this work proposed SPIN for Enthnomedicine Semantic Search (SESS), a framework of the semantic search for medicinal plants that were developed by using SPIN (SPARQL Inferencing Notation). SESS has two main parts, the ontology design included SPARQL Inferencing Notation (SPIN) library and query process. The experiments were assessed in terms of execution time, query variation and accuracy. The obtained results showed a ratio of precision at 1, recall at 0.98 and the average value of the f-measure was 0.99. Utilizing SPIN also decrease the time consuming to obtain the result by around .

References

  1. Muhammad Adityatama and Moch Bijaksana. 2017. Pemanfaatan Sparql Inferencing Notation (spin) Dalam Pencarian Berbasis Semantik Pada Data Makanan. eProceedings of Engineering 4, 3 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mário Antunes, Diogo Gomes, and Rui L Aguiar. 2018. Towards IoT data classification through semantic features. Future Generation Computer Systems 86 (2018), 792–798.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Yahya Aziz and Dewi Wardani. 2021. Multi-Layer Decision Making for Selecting and Using Alternative Medicine with Herbal Plant. In The 2021 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications. 104–110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Nick Bassiliades. 2018. SWRL2SPIN: A tool for transforming SWRL rule bases in OWL ontologies to object-oriented SPIN rules. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.09061(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Nick Bassiliades. 2018. SWRL2SPIN: Converting SWRL to SPIN.. In RuleML+ RR (Supplement).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Nick Bassiliades. 2020. A Tool for Transforming Semantic Web Rule Language to SPARQL Infererecing Notation. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 16, 1(2020), 87–115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Andrzej Białecki, Robert Muir, Grant Ingersoll, and Lucid Imagination. 2012. Apache lucene 4. In SIGIR 2012 workshop on open source information retrieval. 17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Imam Cartealy and Li Liao. 2019. Metabolic Pathway Membership Inference Using an Ontology-Based Similarity Approach. In Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Science (Beijing, China) (ICBBS 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369166.3369174Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. André Henrique Dantas Neves Cordeiro. 2019. Apache Jena. Acedido em 2(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Christian Fürber and Martin Hepp. 2010. Using SPARQL and SPIN for data quality management on the semantic web. In International Conference on Business Information Systems. Springer, 35–46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kim Soon Gan, Patricia Anthony, Kim On Chin, and Abdul Razak Hamdan. 2020. Enforcing social semantic in fipa-acl using spin. In Agents and Multi-agent Systems: Technologies and Applications 2019. Springer, 3–13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. John H Gennari, Mark A Musen, Ray W Fergerson, William E Grosso, Monica Crubézy, Henrik Eriksson, Natalya F Noy, and Samson W Tu. 2003. The evolution of Protégé: an environment for knowledge-based systems development. International Journal of Human-computer studies 58, 1 (2003), 89–123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Samridhi Gupta and Bhavna Arora. 2022. Stemming Techniques on English Language and Devanagari Script: A Review. Recent Innovations in Computing(2022), 541–550.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhi-Jie Han, Wei-Wei Xue, Lin Tao, and Feng Zhu. 2018. Identification of novel immune-relevant drug target genes for Alzheimer’s disease by combining ontology inference with network analysis. CNS neuroscience & therapeutics 24, 12 (2018), 1253–1263.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Cosmas Haryawan. 2014. Pemanfaatan Sparql Inferencing Notation (Spin) Dalam Prototipe Pencarian Data Restoran Berbasis Semantik. Jurnal Teknologi TECHNOSCIENTIA 6, 2 (2014), 110–122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jonner Hasugian. 2006. Penggunaan bahasa alamiah dan kosa kata terkendali dalam sistem temu balik informasi berbasis teks. Jurnal Studi Perpustakaan dan Informasi 2, 2 (2006), 72–80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mohamed AG Hazber, Ruixuan Li, Bing Li, Yuqi Zhao, and Khaled MA Alalayah. 2019. A survey: Transformation for integrating relational database with semantic Web. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Management Engineering, Software Engineering and Service Sciences. 66–73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hengyi Hu and Larry Kerschberg. 2018. Evolving Medical Ontologies Based on Causal Inference. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining(Barcelona, Spain) (ASONAM ’18). IEEE Press, 954–957.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Eeva Järvenpää, Otto Hylli, Niko Siltala, and Minna Lanz. 2018. Utilizing SPIN rules to infer the parameters for combined capabilities of aggregated manufacturing resources. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51, 11 (2018), 84–89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Heni Jusuf and Ariana Azimah. [n. d.]. PERANCANGAN WEB SEMANTIK APLIKASI PENCARIAN TUMBUHAN OBAT MENGGUNAKAN PROTÉGÉ 4.3. 0. ([n. d.]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. H Knublauch. 2014. SPIN-Modeling Vocabulary. W3C Member Submission.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. H Knublauch. 2017. The TopBraid SPIN API.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Holger Knublauch, James A Hendler, and Kingsley Idehen. 2011. SPIN-overview and motivation. W3C Member Submission 22(2011), W3C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Fatima Zohra Laallam, Mohammed Lamine Kherfi, and Sidi Mohammed Benslimane. 2013. USING ONTOLOGIES TO OVERCOMING DRAWBACKS OF DATABASES AND VICE VERSA: A SURVEY. Computer Science & Engineering 3, 2 (2013), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Nicolas Matentzoglu, Markel Vigo, Caroline Jay, and Robert Stevens. 2018. Inference inspector: Improving the verification of ontology authoring actions. Journal of Web Semantics 49 (2018), 1–15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Archana Patel and Sarika Jain. 2021. Present and future of semantic web technologies: a research statement. International Journal of Computers and Applications 43, 5(2021), 413–422.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Mārcis Pinnis. 2018. Tilde’s parallel corpus filtering methods for WMT 2018. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Machine Translation: Shared Task Papers. 939–945.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Yasir Ali Solangi, Zulfiqar Ali Solangi, Samreen Aarain, Amna Abro, Ghulam Ali Mallah, and Asadullah Shah. 2018. Review on natural language processing (NLP) and its toolkits for opinion mining and sentiment analysis. In 2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Applied Sciences (ICETAS). IEEE, 1–4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Budi Susanto, Hake Y Situmorang, and Gloria Virginia. 2019. RDFS-based information representation of Indonesian traditional jamu. In Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science: Proceedings of The International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists. 13–15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Alberto Traverso, Johan Van Soest, Leonard Wee, and Andre Dekker. 2018. The radiation oncology ontology (ROO): Publishing linked data in radiation oncology using semantic web and ontology techniques. Medical physics 45, 10 (2018), e854–e862.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Rouaa Wannous, A Bouju, J Malki, and Cecile Vincent. 2014. Ontology inference using spatial and trajectory domain rules. Proc. of WorldComp, Las Vegas, USA(2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Dewi Wardani, Ryhannul Jannah, and Haryono Setiadi. 2020. Major choosing decision support system with talent interest approach using SWRL and SAW method. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology. 95–100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Dewi Wisnu Wardani and Sri H Yustianti. 2014. An Ontology of Indonesian Ethnomedicine. In 2014 International Conference on Information, Communication Technology and System. 47–52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Monika Yadav, Vijendra Singh, 2021. Ontology based data integration and mapping for adverse drug reaction. In 2021 6th International Conference on Signal Processing, Computing and Control (ISPCC). IEEE, 719–727.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Youyong Zou, Tim Finin, and Harry Chen. 2004. F-owl: An inference engine for semantic web. In International Workshop on Formal Approaches to Agent-Based Systems. Springer, 238–248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. SESS: Utilization of SPIN for Ethnomedicine Semantic Search

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IC3INA '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications
      November 2022
      415 pages
      ISBN:9781450397902
      DOI:10.1145/3575882

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 February 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format