skip to main content
10.1145/3575882.3575920acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic3inaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modelling the climate factors affecting forest fire in Sumatra using Random Forest and Artificial Neural Network

Published:27 February 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Carbon emissions produced by forest fires contribute to the global emission increase. The amount of carbon emission may indicate the severity of the fires. In a dry climate condition, forest fires become an unexpected serious problem. This paper investigates the effect of climate variables on forest fires in Sumatra from 1998 to 2018. We employ two methods, Random Forest (RF) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to predict the carbon emission in 2019-2021. The total emission over the domain and the fire distribution map are compared in both models. As a result, the RF model is more accurate in predicting the location and intensity in 2019 but overestimates in 2020-2021. This indicates that the RF model gives a slightly better prediction when the carbon emission is high. This result is consistent with the evaluation metrics showing that ANN mostly gives smaller errors. Also, we found that the climate variables are still relevant to describe the carbon emissions through both models with importance scores of more than .

References

  1. M. Bisquert, E. Caselles, J. M. Sánchez, and V. Caselles. 2012. Application of artificial neural networks and logistic regression to the prediction of forest fire danger in Galicia using MODIS data. International Journal of Wildland Fire 21 (2012), 1025–1029.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. L. Breiman. 2001. Random forests. Machine learning 45, 1 (2001), 5–32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. C. C. Chen, H. W. Lin, J. Y. Yu, and M. H Lo. 2016. The 2015 Borneo fires: What have we learned from the 1997 and 2006 El Niños?Environmental Research Letters 11, 10 (2016), 104003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. R. Comert, U. Avdan, T. Gorum, and H. A. Nefeslioglu. 2019. Mapping of shallow landslides with object-based image analysis from unmanned aerial vehicle data. Engineering Geology 260(2019), 105264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. [n. d.]. SiPongi Forest and Land Fires Monitoring System. Available online https://sipongi.menlhk.go.id/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Field et al. 2016. Indonesian fire activity and smoke pollution in 2015 show persistent nonlinear sensitivity to El Niño-induced drought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 33(2016), 9204–9209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Giglio et al. 2013. Analysis of daily, monthly, and annual burned areas using the fourth-generation global fire emissions database (GFED4). J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosciences 118, 1 (2013), 317–328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hersbach et al.2020. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 146, 730(2020), 1999–2049.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Pedregosa et. al. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011), 2825–2830.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Pham et. al. 2020. Performance evaluation of machine learning methods for forest fire modeling and prediction. Symmetry 12, 6 (2020), 1022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Prasetyo et al. 2022. Assessing Sumatran Peat Vulnerability to Fire under Various Condition of ENSO Phases Using Machine Learning Approaches. Forests 13, 6 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. E. Frankenberg, D. McKee, and D. Thomas. 2005. Health consequences of forest fires in Indonesia. Demography 42, 1 (2005), 109–129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. L. Gigović, H. R. Pourghasemi, S. Drobnjak, and S. Bai. 2019. Testing a new ensemble model based on SVM and random forest in forest fire susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Serbia’s Tara National Park. Forests 10, 5 (2019), 408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. I. C. Hidayati, N Nalaratih, A Shabrina, I. N. Wahyuni, and A. L. Latifah. 2020. Correlation of Climate Variability and Burned Area in Borneo using Clustering Methods. Forest and Society 4(2020). https://doi.org/FS.V4I2.9687Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. P. Jain, S. CP Coogan, S. G. Subramanian, M. Crowley, S. Taylor, and M. D. Flannigan. 2020. A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and management. Environmental Reviews 28, 4 (2020), 478–505.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. S. Kanga and S. K. Singh. 2017. Forest Fire Simulation Modeling using Remote Sensing & GIS.International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science 8, 5(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. P. L Kinney. 2018. Interactions of climate change, air pollution, and human health. Current environmental health reports 5, 1 (2018), 179–186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. L. Latifah, A. Shabrina, I. N. Wahyuni, and R. Sadikin. 2019. Evaluation of Random Forest model for forest fire prediction based on climatology over Borneo. In 2019 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and its Applications (IC3INA). IEEE, 4–8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. G. Louppe. 2014. Understanding random forests: From theory to practice. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.7502(2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. W. Ma, Z. Feng, Z. Cheng, S. Chen, and F. Wang. 2020. Identifying forest fire driving factors and related impacts in china using random forest algorithm. Forests 11, 5 (2020), 507.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. J. Miettinen, C. Shi, and S. C. Liew. 2017. Fire distribution in Peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra and Borneo in 2015 with special emphasis on peatland fires. Environmental management 60, 4 (2017), 747–757.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. Mohajane, R. Costache, F. Karimi, Q. B. Pham, A. Essahlaoui, H. Nguyen, G. Laneve, and F. Oudija. 2021. Application of remote sensing and machine learning algorithms for forest fire mapping in a Mediterranean area. Ecological Indicators 129 (2021), 107869.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. K Narendran. 2001. Forest fires. Resonance 6, 11 (2001), 34–41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. NPL. 1996. A Guide to the Measurement of Humidity. The Institute of Measurement and Control. 53–54 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. S. Nurdiati, A. Sopaheluwakan, M. T. Julianto, P. Septiawan, and F. Rohimahastuti. 2021. Modelling and analysis impact of El Nino and IOD to land and forest fire using polynomial and generalized logistic function: Cases study in South Sumatra and Kalimantan, Indonesia. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment(2021), 1–16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. S. Nurdiati, A. Sopaheluwakan, and P. Septiawan. 2021. Spatial and temporal analysis of El Niño impact on land and forest fire in Kalimantan and Sumatra. Agromet 35, 1 (2021), 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. S. E. Page, F. Siegert, J. O. Rieley, H. V Boehm, A. Jaya, and S. Limin. 2002. The amount of carbon released from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997. Nature 420, 6911 (2002), 61–65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. S. J. Rigatti. 2017. Random forest. Journal of Insurance Medicine 47, 1 (2017), 31–39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. A. H. Sadat Razavi, M. Shafiepour Motlagh, A. Noorpoor, and A. H. Ehsani. 2020. Modeling of wildfire occurrence by using climate data and effect of temperature increments. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions 2020 (2020), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2020-353Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. O. Satir, S. Berberoglu, and C. Donmez. 2016. Mapping regional forest fire probability using artificial neural network model in a Mediterranean forest ecosystem. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 7, 5 (2016), 1645–1658.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. I. N. Wahyuni, A. Shabrina, and A. L. Latifah. 2021. Investigating Multivariable Factors of the Southern Borneo Forest and Land Fire based on Random Forest Model. In The 2021 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications. 71–75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Modelling the climate factors affecting forest fire in Sumatra using Random Forest and Artificial Neural Network

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IC3INA '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications
      November 2022
      415 pages
      ISBN:9781450397902
      DOI:10.1145/3575882

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      © 2022 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 February 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format