Abdurrakhman Prasetyadi
ABSTRACT
Making 3D animation using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) – photogrammetric technique requires appropriate specifications in taking serial aerial photographs. This paper aims to compare two specifications for orthomosaic image capture. The study focuses on the comparison of Close Range Photogrammetry (CRP) and Ground Control Points (GCP) specifications. After analyzing the orthomosaic image using the visual analytics method, it was found that the combined of both specifications produced better image quality for 3D Animation Modeling.
- D. Sugawara, “Numerical modeling of tsunami: advances and future challenges after the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami,” Earth-Science Rev, vol. 214, no. Maret, pp. 1–27, 2021.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. Isshiki, M. Asai, S. Eguchi, and H. O-Tani, “3D Tsunami Run-up Simulation and Visualization using Particle Method with Gis-Based Geography Model,” J Earthq Tsunami, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1–22, 2016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Y. Rezaldi, A. Yoganingrum, N. R. Hanifa, Y. Kaneda, S. K. Kushadiani, A. Prasetyadi, B. Nugroho, and A. M. Riyanto, “Unmanned aerial vehicle (Uav) and photogrammetric technic for 3d tsunamis safety modeling in cilacap, indonesia,” Appl Sci, vol. 11, no. 23, 2021.Google Scholar
- M. Sedrati, J. A. Morales, A. El M'rini, E. J. Anthony, G. Bulot, R. Le Gall, and A. Tadibaght, “Using UAV and Structure-From-Motion Photogrammetry for the Detection of Boulder Movement by Storms on a Rocky Shore Platform in Laghdira, Northwest Morocco,” Remote Sens, vol. 14, no. 16, p. 4102, 2022.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Hoffmeister, C. Curdt, and G. Bareth, “Monitoring the sedimentary budget and dislocated boulders in western Greece – results since 2008,” Sedimentology, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 1411–1430, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Biolchi, C. Denamiel, S. Devoto, T. Korbar, V. Macovaz, G. Scicchitano, I. Vilibić, and S. Furlani, “Impact of the October 2018 storm Vaia on coastal boulders in the northern Adriatic Sea,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1–23, 2019.Google Scholar
- M. A. Marfai, H. Fatchurohman, and A. Cahyadi, “An Evaluation of Tsunami Hazard Modeling in Gunungkidul Coastal Area using UAV Photogrammetry and GIS. Case Study: Drini Coastal Area,” in E3S Web of Conferences, 2019, vol. 125.Google Scholar
- S. Biolchi, S. Furlani, S. Devoto, G. Scicchitano, T. Korbar, I. Vilibić, and J. Šepić, “The origin and dynamics of coastal boulders in a semi-enclosed shallow basin: A northern Adriatic case study,” Mar Geol, vol. 411, no. January, pp. 62–77, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. C. Nogueira, L. Roberto, T. S. Körting, and E. H. Shiguemori, “Accuracy analysis of orthomosaic and DSM produced from sensor aboard UAV,” in XVIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto -SBSR, 2017, no. May, pp. 5515–5522.Google Scholar
- L. R. A. Júnior, M. E. Ferreira, J. B. R. Côrtes, and L. A. de Castro Jorge, “High accuracy mapping with cartographic assessment for a fixed-wing remotely piloted aircraft system,” J Appl Remote Sens, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2018.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. A. Elhalawani, Z. M. Zeidan, and A. A. A. Beshr, “IMPLEMENTATION OF CLOSE RANGE PHOTOGRAMMETRY USING MODERN NON-METRIC DIGITAL CAMERAS FOR ARCHITECTURAL DOCUMENTATION,” Geod Cartogr, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 45–53, Apr. 2021.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Singhal, B. Bansod, and L. Mathew, “Unmanned Aerial Vehicle classification, Applications and challenges: A Review,” Preprints. pp. 1–20, 2018.Google Scholar
- A. Z. Khalaf and A. Hameed, “Orthomosaic from Generating 3D Models with Photogrammetry,” Int J Innov Sci Res Technol, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 48–60, 2020.Google Scholar
- M. . Boon, R. Greenfield, and S. Tesfamichael, “Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Photogrammetry Produces Accurate High-resolution Orthophotos, Point Clouds and Surface Models for Mapping Wetlands,” South African J Geomatics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 186–200, 2016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Remondino, L. Barazzetti, F. Nex, M. Scaioni, and D. Sarazzi, “UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR MAPPING AND 3D MODELING – CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES,” Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci, vol. XXXVIII-1/, pp. 25–31, Sep. 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Marín-Buzón, A. Pérez-Romero, J. L. López-Castro, I. Ben Jerbania, and F. Manzano-Agugliaro, “Photogrammetry as a New Scientific Tool in Archaeology: Worldwide Research Trends,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 9, p. 5319, May 2021.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Sangjan, R. J. McGee, and S. Sankaran, “Optimization of UAV-Based Imaging and Image Processing Orthomosaic and Point Cloud Approaches for Estimating Biomass in a Forage Crop,” Remote Sens, vol. 14, no. 10, p. 2396, May 2022.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Pérez, F. Agüera, and F. Carvajal, “LOW COST SURVEYING USING AN UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE,” Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci, vol. XL-1/W2, pp. 311–315, Aug. 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Myburgh, H. Botha, C. T. Downs, and S. M. Woodborne, “The Application and Limitations of a Low-Cost UAV Platform and Open-Source Software Combination for Ecological Mapping and Monitoring,” African J Wildl Res, vol. 51, no. 1, Dec. 2021.Google Scholar
- S. Tan, “Animation Image Art Design Mode Using 3D Modeling Technology,” Wirel Commun Mob Comput, vol. 2022, pp. 1–9, Mar. 2022.Google Scholar
- D. H. Ghani, “The Research of 3D Modeling between Visual & Creativity,” Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng, vol. 8, no. 11S2, pp. 180–186, Oct. 2019.Google Scholar
- Y. Liao, M. E. Mohammadi, and R. L. Wood, “Deep Learning Classification of 2D Orthomosaic Images and 3D Point Clouds for Post-Event Structural Damage Assessment,” Drones, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 24, Jun. 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. J. Caban and D. Gotz, “Visual analytics in healthcare – opportunities and research challenges,” J Am Med Informatics Assoc, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 260–262, Mar. 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. A. Cook and J. J. Thomas, Illuminating the path: The research and development agenda for visual analytics,’’ Pacific Northwest Nat. Lab., Richland. 2005.Google Scholar
- A. Kerren, J.-D. Fekete, and J. Stasko, Information Visualization, vol. 4950. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. A. Keim, F. Mansmann, D. Oelke, and H. Ziegler, “Visual Analytics: Combining Automated Discovery with Interactive Visualizations,” 2008, pp. 2–14.Google Scholar
- W. Cui, “Visual Analytics: A Comprehensive Overview,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, no. June, pp. 81555–81573, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. M. Patil, “A Study on Visual Analytics,” Int J Comput Sci Inf Technol Res, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 303–308, 2015.Google Scholar
Recommendations
3D Orthomosaic From Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Image Data For Real-World Environment 3D Map Creation Autonomous Vehicles Simulation System
IC3INA '21: Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its ApplicationsTesting is necessary to prove the reliability of autonomous vehicles (AV) statistically and to reduce fatal accidents. However, the manual testing process takes a long time and be expensive. One of the solutions to address this issue is to use a ...
3D Air-X UAV Communications: Challenges and Channel Modeling
Communication Technologies for VehiclesAbstractThe use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is growing rapidly, for an expanding variety of applications. These UAVs range in size from a few centimeters to the size of passenger jet aircraft, and will fly a large assortment of missions that take ...
Modeling and Simulation of the HADA Reconfigurable UAV
The "Helicopter ADaptive Aircraft" (HADA) is a reconfigurable UAV that performs both as a helicopter for take-off, landing and hovering flight, but that "morphs" in flight to a conventional fixed wing configuration for cruise flight, unfolding the wings ...
Comments