skip to main content
10.1145/3575882.3575952acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic3inaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Anomaly Detection of Hallux Valgus using Plantar Pressure Data

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 February 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Machine learning is a superior tool that is unbiased and moderately comparable to the medical expert in making medical diagnostics if trained with correct supervision. In this paper we developed a supervised learning algorithm employing plantar pressure data to detect the anomaly called hallux valgus (HV) on a number of subject. Support vector machine (SVM) and its variants such as kernel SVM and ensemble SVM were evaluated on a plantar pressure open dataset. Results show that SVMs in general have the average classification rate of above 90 percent.

References

  1. Brian G. Booth, Noel L.W. Keijsers, Toon Huysmans, and Jan Sijbers. 2019. The CAD WALK Hallux Valgus Dataset (Pre-Surgery). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3406523 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska- Curie grant agreement No 746614..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Leo Breiman. 1996. Bagging predictors. Machine learning 24, 2 (1996), 123–140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Sicco A Bus and Antony de Lange. 2005. A comparison of the 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step protocols for obtaining barefoot plantar pressure data in the diabetic neuropathic foot. Clinical biomechanics 20, 9 (2005), 892–899.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. PR Cavanagh and JS Ulbrecht. 1994. Clinical plantar pressure measurement in diabetes: rationale and methodology. The foot 4, 3 (1994), 123–135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong, James A Nunley, Nathan A Mall, and Robin M Queen. 2008. The effect of foot type on in-shoe plantar pressure during walking and running. Gait & posture 28, 3 (2008), 405–411.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Corinna Cortes and Vladimir Vapnik. 1995. Support-Vector Networks. In Machine Learning. 273–297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. John P Cunningham and Zoubin Ghahramani. 2015. Linear dimensionality reduction: Survey, insights, and generalizations. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 16, 1 (2015), 2859–2900.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Malindu Fernando, Robert Crowther, Peter Lazzarini, Kunwarjit Sangla, Margaret Cunningham, Petra Buttner, and Jonathan Golledge. 2013. Biomechanical characteristics of peripheral diabetic neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of findings from the gait cycle, muscle activity and dynamic barefoot plantar pressure. Clinical biomechanics 28, 8 (2013), 831–845.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Saeed Forghany, Christopher Nester, Sarah Tyson, Stephen Preece, and Richard Jones. 2019. Plantar pressure distribution in people with stroke and association with functional mobility. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research 6, 2 (2019), 80–85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yoav Freund and Robert E Schapire. 1997. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of computer and system sciences 55, 1 (1997), 119–139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hyo-Seon Jeon, Jonghee Han, Won-Jin Yi, BeomSeok Jeon, and Kwang Suk Park. 2008. Classification of Parkinson gait and normal gait using spatial-temporal image of plantar pressure. In 2008 30th annual international conference of the ieee engineering in medicine and biology society. IEEE, 4672–4675.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Muge Kirmizi, Yesim S Sengul, and Salih Angin. 2020. The effects of gait speed on plantar pressure variables in individuals with normal foot posture and flatfoot. Acta Bioeng. Biomech 22, 3 (2020), 161–168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Lawrence A Lavery, David G Armstrong, Robert P Wunderlich, Jeffrey Tredwell, and Andrew JM Boulton. 2003. Predictive value of foot pressure assessment as part of a population-based diabetes disease management program. Diabetes care 26, 4 (2003), 1069–1073.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Christina Zong-Hao Ma, Yong-Ping Zheng, and Winson Chiu-Chun Lee. 2018. Changes in gait and plantar foot loading upon using vibrotactile wearable biofeedback system in patients with stroke. Topics in stroke rehabilitation 25, 1 (2018), 20–27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Katrina S Maluf, Robert E Morley Jr, Edward J Richter, Joseph W Klaesner, and Michael J Mueller. 2004. Foot pressures during level walking are strongly associated with pressures during other ambulatory activities in subjects with diabetic neuropathy. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 85, 2(2004), 253–260.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. National Institute of Health. 2013. Neuroimaging Informatics Technology Initiative. Retrieved August 1, 2022 from https://nifti.nimh.nih.gov/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ryuhei Okuno, Satoshi Fujimoto, Jun Akazawa, Masaru Yokoe, Saburo Sakoda, and Kenzo Akazawa. 2008. Analysis of spatial temporal plantar pressure pattern during gait in Parkinson’s disease. In 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE, 1765–1768.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Gaurav Shalin, Scott Pardoel, Edward D Lemaire, Julie Nantel, and Jonathan Kofman. 2021. Prediction and detection of freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease from plantar pressure data using long short-term memory neural-networks. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 18, 1(2021), 1–15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Gaurav Shalin, Scott Pardoel, Julie Nantel, Edward D Lemaire, and Jonathan Kofman. 2020. Prediction of freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease from foot plantar-pressure arrays using a convolutional neural network. In 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 244–247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Joyce AC van Tunen, Kade L Paterson, Tim V Wrigley, Ben R Metcalf, Jonas B Thorlund, and Rana S Hinman. 2018. Effect of knee unloading shoes on regional plantar forces in people with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis–an exploratory study. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 11, 1 (2018), 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Mo Wang, Zhuochen Fan, Fei Chen, Sixu Zhang, Chen Peng, 2019. Research on feature extraction algorithm for plantar pressure image and gait analysis in stroke patients. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 58 (2019), 525–531.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Zhiwang Zhang, Lin Wang, Kaijun Hu, and Yu Liu. 2017. Characteristics of plantar loads during walking in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research 23(2017), 5714.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Anomaly Detection of Hallux Valgus using Plantar Pressure Data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IC3INA '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications
      November 2022
      415 pages
      ISBN:9781450397902
      DOI:10.1145/3575882

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      © 2022 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 February 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format