skip to main content
10.1145/3576781.3608722acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnanocomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Decoding Multiple Interfering Signals in a Macroscopic Air-based Molecular Communication System

Published:20 September 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Molecular communication (MC) prevails as a preferred scheme in environments where electromagnetic waves are not feasible such as tunnels, mines, or pipes. Air-based molecular communication (MC) promises an increased data rate compared to fluid-based implementations, particularly for distances of a few meters. In this paper, we investigate the communication performance of a 2-sender-1-receiver transmission model. We propose a mechanism with low complexity that allows to decode multiple overlaying signals modulated using On-Off-Keying (OOK). In particular, our receiver interprets the signal as an Quadrature Concentration Shift Keying (QCSK) modulated waveform. We conducted experiments to study the impact of parameter changes, especially concerning a distance offset between the emitters and the receiver and the timing offset on the emitter's side. The key metric used is the bit error rate (BER). Our results indicate that an adequate parameter setup and sampling point allows achieving a quasi-error-free transmission.

References

  1. Mahmoud Abbaszadeh, Weiqiu Li, Lin Lin, Iain White, Petr Denissenko, Peter J. Thomas, and Weisi Guo. 2019. Mutual Information and Noise Distributions of Molecular Signals using Laser Induced Fluorescence. In IEEE GLOBECOM 2019. IEEE, Waikoloa, HI, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOBECOM38437.2019.9013877Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. D. Nashid Anjum and Honggang Wang. 2020. Molecular Communication for Wireless Body Area Networks. In Encyclopedia of Wireless Networks (1 ed.), Xuemin Shen, Xiaodong Lin, and Kuan Zhang (Eds.). Springer, 921--925. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78262-1_152Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Iresha Atthanayake, Siavash Esfahani, Petr Denissenko, Ian Guymer, Peter J. Thomas, and Weisi Guo. 2018. Experimental Molecular Communications in Obstacle Rich Fluids. In ACM NANOCOM 2018. ACM, Reykjavík, Iceland. https://doi.org/10.1145/3233188.3233216Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Sunasheer Bhattacharjee, Martin Damrath, Fabian Bronner, Lukas Stratmann, Jan Peter Drees, Falko Dressler, and Peter Adam Hoeher. 2020. A Testbed and Simulation Framework for Air-based Molecular Communication using Fluorescein. In ACM NANOCOM 2020. ACM, Virtual Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411295.3411298Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Martin Damrath and Peter Adam Hoeher. 2016. Low-Complexity Adaptive Threshold Detection for Molecular Communication. IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience 15, 3 (Jan. 2016), 200--208. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnb.2016.2520566Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Maheshi Buddhinee Dissanayake, Yansha Deng, Arumugam Nallanathan, Maged Elkashlan, and Urbashi Mitra. 2019. Interference Mitigation in Large-Scale Multiuser Molecular Communication. IEEE Transactions on Communications 67, 6 (June 2019), 4088--4103. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2019.2897568Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Jan Peter Drees, Lukas Stratmann, Fabian Bronner, Max Bartunik, Jens Kirchner, Harald Unterweger, and Falko Dressler. 2020. Efficient Simulation of Macroscopic Molecular Communication: The Pogona Simulator. In ACM NANOCOM 2020. ACM, Virtual Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411295.3411297Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Nariman Farsad, Weisi Guo, and Andrew W. Eckford. 2013. Tabletop Molecular Communication: Text Messages through Chemical Signals. PLOS ONE 8, 12 (Dec. 2013), 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082935Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Nariman Farsad, H. Birkan Yilmaz, Andrew W. Eckford, Chan-Byoung Chae, and Weisi Guo. 2016. A Comprehensive Survey of Recent Advancements in Molecular Communication. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 18, 3 (2016), 1887--1919. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2016.2527741Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Werner Haselmayr, Andreas Springer, Georg Fischer, Christoph Alexiou, Holger Boche, Peter Adam Hoeher, Falko Dressler, and Robert Schober. 2019. Integration of Molecular Communications into Future Generation Wireless Networks. In 6G Wireless Summit. IEEE, Levi, Finland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Pit Hofmann, Jorge Torres Gómez, Falko Dressler, and Frank H. P. Fitzek. 2022. Testbed-based Receiver Optimization for SISO Molecular Communication Channels. In IEEE BalkanCom 2022. IEEE, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 120--125. https://doi.org/10.1109/BalkanCom55633.2022.9900720Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mehmet Sukru Kuran, H. Birkan Yilmaz, Ilker Demirkol, Nariman Farsad, and Andrea Goldsmith. 2021. A Survey on Modulation Techniques in Molecular Communication via Diffusion. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 23, 1 (Jan. 2021), 7--28. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2020.3048099Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Mehmet Şükrü Kuran, H. Birkan Yilmaz, Tuna Tugcu, and Ian F. Akyildiz. 2012. Interference effects on modulation techniques in diffusion based nanonetworks. Elsevier Nano Communication Networks 3, 1 (March 2012), 65--73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2012.01.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Rebecca Corinna Pampu. 2023. Identification of the Signal Source among Multiple Simultaneous Senders in an Air-based Molecular Communication Channel. Bachelor Thesis. TU Berlin. Advisor(s) Stratmann, Lukas.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Song Qiu, Weisi Guo, Siyi Wang, Nariman Farsad, and Andrew Eckford. 2014. A molecular communication link for monitoring in confined environments. In IEEE ICC 2014, Workshop on Communications in Underground and Confined Environments. IEEE, Sydney, Australia. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccw.2014.6881284Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Burcu Tepekule, Ali E. Pusane, H. Birkan Yilmaz, Chan-Byoung Chae, and Tuna Tugcu. 2015. ISI Mitigation Techniques in Molecular Communication. IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications 1, 2 (June 2015), 202--216. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMBMC.2015.2501745Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Wen-Bin Yang and Kamran Sayrafian-Pour. 2012. Interference Mitigation Using Adaptive Schemes in Body Area Networks. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks 19 (2012), 193--200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-012-0192-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Decoding Multiple Interfering Signals in a Macroscopic Air-based Molecular Communication System

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        NANOCOM '23: Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication
        September 2023
        184 pages
        ISBN:9798400700347
        DOI:10.1145/3576781

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 September 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate97of135submissions,72%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader