Federico Calì
ABSTRACT
Synthetic molecular communication is an innovative communication method that allows information to be transferred by means of chemical messengers instead of electromagnetic waves. In this work, we exploit a peculiar chemical-physical phenomenon due to the development of interfacial instability between two miscible liquids to confine chemical messengers and modulate the associated signal. The chemical messengers we prepare for the purpose are fluorescent nanoparticles known as carbon quantum dots. First theoretically and then experimentally, we demonstrate that by exploiting the chemical messengers' confinement a significant increase in message transmission speed can be achieved with respect to the traditional signal modulation methods already known in the molecular communication community
- SBASGS Banik, Sanghamitra Bandyopadhyay, and S Ganguly. 2003. Bioeffects of microwave---a brief review. Bioresource technology 87, 2 (2003), 155--159.Google Scholar
- Delbert Almerick T Boncan, Stacey SK Tsang, Chade Li, Ivy HT Lee, Hon-Ming Lam, Ting-Fung Chan, and Jerome HL Hui. 2020. Terpenes and terpenoids in plants: Interactions with environment and insects. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, 19 (2020), 7382.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Federico Calì, Valentina Cantaro, Luca Fichera, Roberta Ruffino, Giuseppe Trusso Sfrazzetto, Giovanni Li-Destri, and Nunzio Tuccitto. 2021. Carbon quantum dots from lemon waste enable communication among biodevices. Chemosensors 9, 8 (2021), 202.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Federico Calì, Luca Fichera, Giuseppe Trusso Sfrazzetto, Giuseppe Nicotra, Gianfranco Sfuncia, Elena Bruno, Luca Lanzanò, Ignazio Barbagallo, Giovanni Li-Destri, and Nunzio Tuccitto. 2022. Fluorescent nanoparticles for reliable communication among implantable medical devices. Carbon 190 (2022), 262--275.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Federico Calì, Luca Fichera, and Nunzio Tuccitto. 2022. Comprehensive step-by-step procedure to setup a molecular communication through liquid experiment. MethodsX 9 (2022), 101736.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Federico Calì, Giovanni Li-Destri, and Nunzio Tuccitto. 2023. Interfacial Shift Keying Allows a High Information Rate in Molecular Communication: Methods and Data. IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications (2023), 1--1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMBMC.2023.3290076Google ScholarCross Ref
- Uche AK Chude-Okonkwo, Reza Malekian, Bodhaswar T Maharaj, and Athanasios V Vasilakos. 2017. Molecular communication and nanonetwork for targeted drug delivery: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 19, 4 (2017), 3046--3096.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gerard Daccord, Johann Nittmann, and H Eugene Stanley. 1986. Radial viscous fingers and diffusion-limited aggregation: Fractal dimension and growth sites. Physical review letters 56, 4 (1986), 336.Google Scholar
- Beatriz de Luis, Antoni Llopis-Lorente, Paola Rincón, José Gadea, Félix Sancenón, Elena Aznar, Reynaldo Villalonga, José Ramón Murguía, and Ramón Martínez-Máñez. 2019. An interactive model of communication between abiotic nanodevices and microorganisms. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 58, 42 (2019), 14986--14990.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John R Fanchi. 2005. Principles of applied reservoir simulation. Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Nariman Farsad, Weisi Guo, and Andrew W Eckford. 2013. Tabletop molecular communication: Text messages through chemical signals. PloS one 8, 12 (2013), e82935.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nariman Farsad, H Birkan Yilmaz, Andrew Eckford, Chan-Byoung Chae, and Weisi Guo. 2016. A comprehensive survey of recent advancements in molecular communication. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 18, 3 (2016), 1887--1919.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maria Guix, Sonja M Weiz, Oliver G Schmidt, and Mariana Medina-Sánchez. 2018. Self-propelled micro/nanoparticle motors. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization 35, 2 (2018), 1700382.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weisi Guo, Mahmoud Abbaszadeh, Lin Lin, Jerome Charmet, Peter Thomas, Zhuangkun Wei, Bin Li, and Chenglin Zhao. 2021. Molecular physical layer for 6G in wave-denied environments. IEEE Communications Magazine 59, 5 (2021), 33--39.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Birendra Jha, Luis Cueto-Felgueroso, and Ruben Juanes. 2013. Synergetic fluid mixing from viscous fingering and alternating injection. Physical review letters 111, 14 (2013), 144501.Google Scholar
- Jolanta Kaszuba-Zwoińska, Jerzy Gremba, Barbara Gałdzińska-Calik, Karolina Wójcik-Piotrowicz, and Piotr Thor. 2015. Electromagnetic field induced biological effects in humans. Trzegląd Lekarski 72, 11 (2015).Google Scholar
- Loong Chuen Lee, Choong-Yeun Liong, and Abdul Aziz Jemain. 2018. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) for classification of high-dimensional (HD) data: a review of contemporary practice strategies and knowledge gaps. Analyst 143, 15 (2018), 3526--3539.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Antoni Llopis-Lorente, Paula Díez, Alfredo Sánchez, María D Marcos, Félix Sancenón, Paloma Martínez-Ruiz, Reynaldo Villalonga, and Ramón Martínez-Máñez. 2017. Interactive models of communication at the nanoscale using nanoparticles that talk to one another. Nature communications 8, 1 (2017), 15511.Google Scholar
- Tadashi Nakano, Michael J Moore, Fang Wei, Athanasios V Vasilakos, and Jianwei Shuai. 2012. Molecular communication and networking: Opportunities and challenges. IEEE transactions on nanobioscience 11, 2 (2012), 135--148.Google Scholar
- Germain Rousseaux, Anne De Wit, and M Martin. 2007. Viscous fingering in packed chromatographic columns: Linear stability analysis. Journal of Chromatography A 1149, 2 (2007), 254--273.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Swagatika Sahu, Birendra Behera, Tapas K Maiti, and Sasmita Mohapatra. 2012. Simple one-step synthesis of highly luminescent carbon dots from orange juice: application as excellent bio-imaging agents. Chemical communications 48, 70 (2012), 8835--8837.Google Scholar
- Harry H Shorey. 2013. Animal communication by pheromones. Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Tatsuya Suda, Michael Moore, Tadashi Nakano, Ryota Egashira, Akihiro Enomoto, Satoshi Hiyama, and Yuki Moritani. 2005. Exploratory research on molecular communication between nanomachines. In Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), Late Breaking Papers, Vol. 25. Citeseer, 29.Google Scholar
- Harald Unterweger, Jens Kirchner, Wayan Wicke, Arman Ahmadzadeh, Doaa Ahmed, Vahid Jamali, Christoph Alexiou, Georg Fischer, and Robert Schober. 2018. Experimental molecular communication testbed based on magnetic nanoparticles in duct flow. In 2018 IEEE 19th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC). IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ke Yang, Dadi Bi, Yansha Deng, Rui Zhang, M Rahman, Najah Abu Ali, Muhammad Ali Imran, Josep M Jornet, Qammer H Abbasi, and Akram Alomainy. 2019. A comprehensive survey on hybrid communication for internet of nano-things in context of body-centric communications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.09424 (2019).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Interfacial instability of liquid interphase improves molecular communication density
Recommendations
A method for the direct numerical simulation of hypersonic boundary-layer instability with finite-rate chemistry
A new numerical method is presented here that allows to consider chemically reacting gases during the direct numerical simulation of a hypersonic fluid flow. The method comprises the direct coupling of a solver for the fluid mechanical model and a ...
Comments