skip to main content
10.1145/3576841.3589619acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccpsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Demonstration of Pishgu: Universal Path Prediction Network Architecture for Real-time Cyber-physical Edge Systems

Published:09 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Pishgu is a universal lightweight network architecture for path prediction in Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) applications, adaptable to multiple subjects, perspectives, and scenes. Our proposed architecture captures inter-dependencies within the subjects in each frame using Graph Isomorphism Networks and attention. In our demonstration, we will show how Pishgu can predict trajectories for pedestrians and vehicles in different real-world scenarios. We will use video data from various sources, such as surveillance cameras, drones, etc., to illustrate the diversity of subjects, perspectives, and scenes that Pishgu can handle. The goal of our demonstration is to showcase the adaptability and robustness of Pishgu in various CPS applications. We will highlight how Pishgu can capture inter-dependencies within the subjects in each frame using Graph Isomorphism Networks (GINs) and attention mechanisms. We will also compare Pishgu with existing solutions on different metrics such as ADE and FDE. We hope that our demonstration will inspire attendees to explore new possibilities for path prediction in CPS applications using Pishgu. In addition, The demonstration will also consist of a poster to highlight the main features of Pishgu and the improvements achieved over the recent trajectory prediction methods.

References

  1. TRECVID Awad George. 2018. Benchmarking Video Activity Detection, Video Captioning and Matching, Video Storytelling Linking and Video Search. In Proceedings of TRECVID.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. James Colyar and John Halkias. 2006. Next Generation SIMulation (NGSIM), Interstate 80 Freeway Dataset. FHWA-HRT-06-137. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/operations/06137/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. James Colyar and John Halkias. 2007. Next Generation SIMulation (NGSIM), US Highway-101 dataset. FHWA-HRT-07-030. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/operations/07030/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Vinit Katariya, Mohammadreza Baharani, Nichole Morris, Omidreza Shoghli, and Hamed Tabkhi. 2022. DeepTrack: Lightweight Deep Learning for Vehicle Trajectory Prediction in Highways. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2022), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Alon Lerner, Yiorgos Chrysanthou, and Dani Lischinski. 2007. Crowds by example. In Computer graphics forum, Vol. 26. Wiley Online Library, 655--664.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lihuan Li, Maurice Pagnucco, and Yang Song. 2022. Graph-Based Spatial Transformer With Memory Replay for Multi-Future Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2231--2241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Xin Li, Xiaowen Ying, and Mooi Choo Chuah. 2020. GRIP ++: Enhanced Graph-based Interaction-aware Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.07792 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Junwei Liang, Lu Jiang, and Alexander Hauptmann. 2020. Simaug: Learning robust representations from simulation for trajectory prediction. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 275--292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Junwei Liang, Lu Jiang, Kevin Murphy, Ting Yu, and Alexander Hauptmann. 2020. The garden of forking paths: Towards multi-future trajectory prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 10508--10518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Junwei Liang, Lu Jiang, Juan Carlos Niebles, Alexander G Hauptmann, and Li Fei-Fei. 2019. Peeking into the future: Predicting future person activities and locations in videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 5725--5734.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lei Lin, Weizi Li, Huikun Bi, and Lingqiao Qin. 2022. Vehicle Trajectory Prediction Using LSTMs With Spatial-Temporal Attention Mechanisms. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 14, 2 (2022), 197--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Stefano Pellegrini, Andreas Ess, Konrad Schindler, and Luc Van Gool. 2009. You'll never walk alone: Modeling social behavior for multi-target tracking. In 2009 IEEE 12th international conference on computer vision. IEEE, 261--268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Keyulu Xu, Weihua Hu, Jure Leskovec, and Stefanie Jegelka. 2018. How powerful are graph neural networks? arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.00826 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ICCPS '23: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 14th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (with CPS-IoT Week 2023)
    May 2023
    291 pages
    ISBN:9798400700361
    DOI:10.1145/3576841

    Copyright © 2023 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 9 May 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate25of91submissions,27%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)38
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader