skip to main content
10.1145/3576938.3576940acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdmipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

3D Binary Lesion Mask Parsing

Published:15 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Liver lesion segmentation is a key module for an automated liver disease diagnosis system. Numerous methods have been developed recently to produce accurate 3D binary lesion masks for CT scans. From the clinical perspective, it is thus important to be able to correctly parse these masks into separate lesion instances in order to enable downstream applications such as lesion tracking and characterization. For the lack of a better alternative, 3D connected component analysis is often used for this task, though it does not always work, especially in the presence of confluent lesions. In this paper, we propose a new method for parsing 3D binary lesion masks and an approach to evaluating its performance. We show that our method outperforms 3D connected component analysis on a large collection of annotated portal-venous phase studies.

References

  1. Serge Beucher and Fernand Meyer. 1993. The morphological approach to segmentation: the watershed transformation. Mathematical morphology in image processing 34 (1993), 433–481.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Patrick Bilic, Patrick Ferdinand Christ, Eugene Vorontsov, Grzegorz Chlebus, Hao Chen, Qi Dou, Chi-Wing Fu, Xiao Han, Pheng-Ann Heng, Jürgen Hesser, Samuel Kadoury, Tomasz K. Konopczynski, Miao Le, Chunming Li, Xiaomeng Li, Jana Lipková, John S. Lowengrub, Hans Meine, Jan Hendrik Moltz, Chris Pal, Marie Piraud, Xiaojuan Qi, Jin Qi, Markus Rempfler, Karsten Roth, Andrea Schenk, Anjany Sekuboyina, Ping Zhou, Christian Hülsemeyer, Marcel Beetz, Florian Ettlinger, Felix Grün, Georgios Kaissis, Fabian Lohöfer, Rickmer Braren, Julian Holch, Felix Hofmann, Wieland H. Sommer, Volker Heinemann, Colin Jacobs, Gabriel Efrain Humpire Mamani, Bram van Ginneken, Gabriel Chartrand, An Tang, Michal Drozdzal, Avi Ben-Cohen, Eyal Klang, Michal Marianne Amitai, Eli Konen, Hayit Greenspan, Johan Moreau, Alexandre Hostettler, Luc Soler, Refael Vivanti, Adi Szeskin, Naama Lev-Cohain, Jacob Sosna, Leo Joskowicz, and Bjoern H. Menze. 2019. The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS). CoRR abs/1901.04056(2019). arxiv:1901.04056http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.04056Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Grzegorz Chlebus, Andrea Schenk, Jan Moltz, Bram Ginneken, Hans Meine, and Horst Hahn. 2018. Automatic liver tumor segmentation in CT with fully convolutional neural networks and object-based postprocessing. Scientific Reports 8 (10 2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33860-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Thomas H. Cormen, Charles E. Leiserson, Ronald L. Rivest, and Clifford Stein. 2009. Introduction to algorithms. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Vicente Grau, AUJ Mewes, M Alcaniz, Ron Kikinis, and Simon K Warfield. 2004. Improved watershed transform for medical image segmentation using prior information. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 23, 4 (2004), 447–458.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Qiangguo Jin, Zhaopeng Meng, Changming Sun, Hui Cui, and Ran Su. 2020. RA-UNet: A hybrid deep attention-aware network to extract liver and tumor in CT scans. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (2020), 1471.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Xiaomeng Li, Hao Chen, Xiaojuan Qi, Qi Dou, Chi-Wing Fu, and Pheng-Ann Heng. 2018. H-DenseUNet: hybrid densely connected UNet for liver and tumor segmentation from CT volumes. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 37, 12 (2018), 2663–2674.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiri Matousek and Bernd Gärtner. 2006. Understanding and using linear programming. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. James Munkres. 1957. Algorithms for the assignment and transportation problems. Journal of the society for industrial and applied mathematics 5, 1(1957), 32–38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lei Song, Haoqian Wang, and Z Jane Wang. 2021. Bridging the gap between 2D and 3D contexts in CT volume for liver and tumor segmentation. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 25, 9(2021), 3450–3459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Youbao Tang, Jinzheng Cai, Ke Yan, Lingyun Huang, Guotong Xie, Jing Xiao, Jingjing Lu, Gigin Lin, and Le Lu. 2021. Weakly-supervised universal lesion segmentation with regional level set loss. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 515–525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Youbao Tang, Yuxing Tang, Yingying Zhu, Jing Xiao, and Ronald M Summers. 2020. E2Net: An Edge Enhanced Network for Accurate Liver and Tumor Segmentation on CT Scans. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 512–522.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jianpeng Zhang, Yutong Xie, Yong Xia, and Chunhua Shen. 2021. DoDNet: Learning to segment multi-organ and tumors from multiple partially labeled datasets. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1195–1204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jianpeng Zhang, Yutong Xie, Pingping Zhang, Hao Chen, Yong Xia, and Chunhua Shen. 2019. Light-Weight Hybrid Convolutional Network for Liver Tumor Segmentation.. In IJCAI, Vol. 19. 4271–4277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. 3D Binary Lesion Mask Parsing

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        DMIP '22: Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Digital Medicine and Image Processing
        November 2022
        88 pages
        ISBN:9781450397643
        DOI:10.1145/3576938

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 March 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format