skip to main content
10.1145/3576938.3576944acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdmipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Improved Binary Tomography Reconstruction

Published:15 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, the binary tomographic reconstruction problem is considered. Binary tomography aims to reconstruct binary images from their projections. Possible applications can be the field of human X-ray angiography, where the aim is to reconstruct images representing blood vessels or heart chambers, using X-ray tomography methods. Injecting a contrast agent with high linear attenuation coefficient into the part of the body being examined and seek for the presence or absence of the contrast agent in certain positions. Other common applications of this field are electron tomography and industrial non-destructive testing. To reconstruct a binary image from their projections, an improved algebraic approach is proposed in this paper. An energy-minimization reconstruction model is used; this model employs a loss function to be minimized. This loss function combines three features that can be extracted from the given projections. First, data fitting term based on the given projections; second, the first two image moments that are extracted from the given projections; and third, a term that enforces the binary solution. The first two terms are expressed in terms of a linear system and the third is expressed as anon linear cost function. The projected gradient descent algorithm is then employed for this minimization process. Experimental evaluations show that reasonable results can be obtained from minimal number of projections.

References

  1. Epstein.L. 2003. Introduction to the mathematics of medical imaging. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River. New Jersey, USAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Natterer.F . 2001. The limited angle problem. The mathematics of computerized tomography. SIAM, 2001, vol. 32, pp. 160–166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hjouj. F. 2019. Towards tomography with random orientation”, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp.49–53, https://doi.org/10.1145/3379299.3379309Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Arjah.H, Hjouj.M, Hjouj. F. 2019. Low dose brain CT, comparative study with brain post processing algorithm. 2nd International Conference on Digital Medicine and Image Processing, DMIP 2019. pp.1-7, https://doi.org/10.1145/3379299.3379308Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Deans. S. 1983. The Radon Transform and Some of Its applications. John Wiley& Sons, Inc. New York, USAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hjouj.F and Jouini.M.S. 2019. On the Radon transform and linear transformations of images. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 26–31, https://doi.org/10.1145/3379299.3379306Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chen.G, and Coulombe.S. 2014. A new image registration method robust to noise, Multidomain,” Syst. Signal Process. vol.25, pp 601–609Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hjouj .F and Jouini. M.S. 2021. On Image Registration using The Radon Transform”: Review-and-Improvement. DMIP '21:2021 4th International Conference on Digital Medicine and Image Processing, pp. 17–23, https://doi.org/10.1145/3506651.3506654Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Chen G.Y, Bui.T.D, Krzyzak.A. 2013. Invariant pattern recognition using Radon dual tree complex wavelet and Fourier transforms. Pattern Recognition. vol.42, pp.2013-2019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jouini .M.S, F Bouchaala, Riahi.K, Sassi.M, Abderrahmane.H, and Hjouj.F. 2022. Multifractal Analysis of Reservoir Rock Samples Using 3D X-Ray Micro Computed Tomography Images. in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 67898-67909, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3186476Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jouini, M.S., AlSumaiti, A., Tembely, M., Hjouj, F., Rahimov, K. 2020. Permeability upscaling in complex carbonate samples using textures of micro-computed tomography images.International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 40(4), pp. 245–259. DOI: 10.1080/02286203.2019.1596728Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jouini.M.S, Bouchaala.F, Ibrahim.E, Hjouj.F. 2022. Permeability and Porosity Upscaling Method Using Machine Learning and Digital Rock Physics. Conference Proceedings, 83rd EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, vol. 2022, pp.1 – 5, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202210016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Chetih.N and Messali.Z. 2015. Tomographic image reconstruction using filtered back projection (FBP) and algebraic reconstruction technique (ART). ”3rd International Conference on Control, Engineering &Information Technology, pp. 1-6, doi:10.1109/CEIT.2015.7233031.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Beister.M, Kolditz.D , Kalender.W. 2012. Iterative reconstruction methods in X-ray CT. Affiliations expand, PMID: 22316498,2012, DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.01.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Needell.D, Srebro.N, Ward.R. 2016. Stochastic gradient descent, weighted sampling, and the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm. Math. Program. vol. 155, pp. 549–573, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-015-0864-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Wang.G, Ye.J, Mueller.K, Fessler.J. 2018. Image Reconstruction is a New Frontier of Machine Learning. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol.37, pp. 1289-1296, doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2833635.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Herman.G, Kuba.A. 2007. Advances in Discrete Tomography and Its Applications. Birkh ̈auser, 443,BostonGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Prause.G, Onnasch.D. 1997. Binary reconstruction of the heart cham bers from biplane angiographic image sequences. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 15, pp.532–46,Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Batenburg.K, Bals.S , Sijbers.J, Kuebel.C, Midgley.P, Hernandez.P, Kaiser.J, Encina.U, endeloo.G.2009. 3D imaging of nanomaterials by discrete tomography. Ultramicroscopy, vol.422109(6), pp.730–740Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kiss.Z, Rodek.L, Kuba.A. 2006. Image reconstruction and correction methods in neutron and X-ray tomography. Acta Cybernetica, vol. 17(3), pp. 557–587Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Schüle.T, Schnörr.C, Weber.S,, Hornegger.J. 2005.Discrete tomography by convex-concave regularization and D.C. programming. Discrete Appl. Math. vol.151, pp. 229–243Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Luki.T . 2011. Discrete tomography reconstruction based on the multi well potential. 14th International Workshop Combinatorial Image Analysis (IWCIA 2011), LNCS, vol. 6636, pp. 335–345Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Zeegers.M, Lucka.F, Batenburg.K. 2018. A multi-channel dart algorithm,” 19th International Workshop on Combinatorial Image Analysis. (IWCIA 2018), LNCS, vol. 11255,pp. 164–178Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. runetti.S, Del Lungo.A, Del Ristoro.F, Kuba.A , Nivat.M. 2001. Reconstruction of 8- and 4-connected convex discrete sets from row and column projections. Linear Algebra Appl. vol.339, pp.37–57Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Hjouj.F, Jouini.M.S. 2020. Review and improvement of the finite moment problem,” Open Chemical Engineering Journal, vol.14, pp.17–24, DOI:10.2174/1874123102014010017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Hjouj.F, Jouini.M.S.2022. On Orthogonal Polynomials and Finite Moment Problem. Open Chemical Engineering Journal,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. T.J. Wang.T.J, T.W. Sze.T.W. 2001. The image moment method for the limited range CT image reconstruction and pattern recognition. Pattern Recognition, vol. 34, pp.2145–2154Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An Improved Binary Tomography Reconstruction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      DMIP '22: Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Digital Medicine and Image Processing
      November 2022
      88 pages
      ISBN:9781450397643
      DOI:10.1145/3576938

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 March 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format