skip to main content
10.1145/3577923.3583637acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescodaspyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access

Multi-Modality Mobile Datasets for Behavioral Biometrics Research: Data/Toolset paper

Published:24 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The ubiquity of mobile devices nowadays necessitates securing the apps and user information stored therein. However, existing one-time entry-point authentication mechanisms and enhanced security mechanisms such as Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) are prone to a wide vector of attacks. Furthermore, MFA also introduces friction to the user experience. Therefore, what is needed is continuous authentication that once passing the entry-point authentication, will protect the mobile devices on a continuous basis by confirming the legitimate owner of the device and locking out detected impostor activities. Hence, more research is needed on the dynamic methods of mobile security such as behavioral biometrics-based continuous authentication, which is cost-effective and passive as the data utilized to authenticate users are logged from the phone's sensors. However, currently, there are not many mobile authentication datasets to perform benchmarking research. In this work, we share two novel mobile datasets (Clarkson University (CU) Mobile datasets I and II) consisting of multi-modality behavioral biometrics data from 49 and 39 users respectively (88 users in total). Each of our datasets consists of modalities such as swipes, keystrokes, acceleration, gyroscope, and pattern-tracing strokes. These modalities are collected when users are filling out a registration form in sitting both as genuine and impostor users. To exhibit the usefulness of the datasets, we have performed initial experiments on selected individual modalities from the datasets as well as the fusion of simultaneously available modalities.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

coda023dt.mp4

Presentation video - short version

mp4

30.2 MB

coda023dt.mp4

Presentation video-short version

mp4

30.2 MB

References

  1. Amith K Belman, Li Wang, SS Iyengar, Pawel Sniatala, Robert Wright, Robert Dora, Jacob Baldwin, Zhanpeng Jin, and Vir V Phoha. 2019. Insights from BB-MAS--A Large Dataset for Typing, Gait and Swipes of the Same Person on Desktop, Tablet and Phone. arXiv:1912.02736 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mario Frank, Ralf Biedert, Eugene Ma, Ivan Martinovic, and Dawn Song. 2012. Touchalytics: On the applicability of touchscreen input as a behavioral biometric for continuous authentication. IEEE transactions on information forensics and security , Vol. 8 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Upal Mahbub, Sayantan Sarkar, Vishal M Patel, and Rama Chellappa. 2016. Active user authentication for smartphones: A challenge data set and benchmark results. In 2016 IEEE 8th international conference on biometrics theory, applications and systems (BTAS). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Karthik Nandakumar, Yi Chen, Sarat C Dass, and Anil Jain. 2007. Likelihood ratio-based biometric score fusion. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , Vol. 30 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Michail D Papamichail, Kyriakos C Chatzidimitriou, Thomas Karanikiotis, Napoleon-Christos I Oikonomou, Andreas L Symeonidis, and Sashi K Saripalle. 2019. BrainRun: A behavioral biometrics dataset towards continuous implicit authentication. Data , Vol. 4 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Aratrika Ray-Dowling, Daqing Hou, Stephanie Schuckers, and Abbie Barbir. 2022. Evaluating multi-modal mobile behavioral biometrics using public datasets. Computers & Security , Vol. 121 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Abdul Serwadda, Vir V Phoha, and Zibo Wang. 2013. Which verifiers work?: A benchmark evaluation of touch-based authentication algorithms. In 2013 IEEE sixth international conference on biometrics: theory, applications and systems (BTAS). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Zdevn ka Sitová , Jaroslav vS edve nka, Qing Yang, Ge Peng, Gang Zhou, Paolo Gasti, and Kiran S Balagani. 2015. HMOG: New behavioral biometric features for continuous authentication of smartphone users. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , Vol. 11 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Giuseppe Stragapede, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez, Ruben Tolosana, and Aythami Morales. 2022. BehavePassDB: Public Database for Mobile Behavioral Biometrics and Benchmark Evaluation. Pattern Recognition (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ahmed Anu Wahab, Daqing Hou, Stephanie Schuckers, and Abbie Barbir. 2022. Securing account recovery mechanism on desktop computers and mobile phones with keystroke dynamics. SN Computer Science, Vol. 3, 5 (2022), 360. ioGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multi-Modality Mobile Datasets for Behavioral Biometrics Research: Data/Toolset paper

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CODASPY '23: Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy
      April 2023
      304 pages
      ISBN:9798400700675
      DOI:10.1145/3577923

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 April 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate149of789submissions,19%

      Upcoming Conference

      CODASPY '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader