skip to main content
10.1145/3578741.3578758acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmlnlpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An effective Time-Aware Encoder for Temporal Knowledge Graph Reasoning

Published:06 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

There are many studies on static knowledge graph (KG) reasoning that predicts missing facts for its completeness. As the facts in real world usually are time-dependent, temporal knowledge graph (TKG) has received great attention lately. Entities and their relations in TKGs may change over time, and how to predict future facts from past facts has become a fundamental subject of TKGs. In this paper, a novel effective time-aware encoder (TAE) is proposed for TKG reasoning. It encodes the influence of time on entities and relations into accurate time-specific embedding representations. Then the embedding representations of entities and relations under different timestamps are employed for the prediction of future facts. The evaluations on four public TKG datasets have demonstrated that TAE outperforms all baseline models on TKG reasoning tasks.

References

  1. Antoine Bordes, Nicolas Usunier, Alberto Garcia-Duran, Jason Weston, and Oksana Yakhnenko. 2013. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. Advances in neural information processing systems 26 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Elizabeth Boschee, Jennifer Lautenschlager, Sean O’Brien, Steve Shellman, James Starz, and Michael Ward. 2015. ICEWS coded event data. Harvard Dataverse 12(2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Shib Sankar Dasgupta, Swayambhu Nath Ray, and Partha Talukdar. 2018. Hyte: Hyperplane-based temporally aware knowledge graph embedding. In Proceedings of the 2018 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 2001–2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Tim Dettmers, Pasquale Minervini, Pontus Stenetorp, and Sebastian Riedel. 2018. Convolutional 2d knowledge graph embeddings. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Alberto García-Durán, Sebastijan Dumančić, and Mathias Niepert. 2018. Learning sequence encoders for temporal knowledge graph completion. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.03202(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Xavier Glorot and Yoshua Bengio. 2010. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 249–256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Rishab Goel, Seyed Mehran Kazemi, Marcus Brubaker, and Pascal Poupart. 2020. Diachronic embedding for temporal knowledge graph completion. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 3988–3995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Tingsong Jiang, Tianyu Liu, Tao Ge, Lei Sha, Baobao Chang, Sujian Li, and Zhifang Sui. 2016. Towards time-aware knowledge graph completion. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. 1715–1724.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Woojeong Jin, Meng Qu, Xisen Jin, and Xiang Ren. 2019. Recurrent event network: Autoregressive structure inference over temporal knowledge graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05530(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Julien Leblay and Melisachew Wudage Chekol. 2018. Deriving validity time in knowledge graph. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018. 1771–1776.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Zixuan Li, Xiaolong Jin, Wei Li, Saiping Guan, Jiafeng Guo, Huawei Shen, Yuanzhuo Wang, and Xueqi Cheng. 2021. Temporal knowledge graph reasoning based on evolutional representation learning. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 408–417.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yankai Lin, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Yang Liu, and Xuan Zhu. 2015. Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion. In Twenty-ninth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Farzane Mahdisoltani, Joanna Biega, and Fabian M Suchanek. 2014. A knowledge base from multilingual Wikipedias–yago3. Technical Report. Technical report, Telecom ParisTech. http://suchanek.name/work/publications....Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Deepak Nathani, Jatin Chauhan, Charu Sharma, and Manohar Kaul. 2019. Learning attention-based embeddings for relation prediction in knowledge graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.01195(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dai Quoc Nguyen, Tu Dinh Nguyen, Dat Quoc Nguyen, and Dinh Phung. 2017. A novel embedding model for knowledge base completion based on convolutional neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.02121(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Maximilian Nickel, Lorenzo Rosasco, and Tomaso Poggio. 2016. Holographic embeddings of knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sashank J Reddi, Satyen Kale, and Sanjiv Kumar. 2019. On the convergence of adam and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.09237(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Michael Schlichtkrull, Thomas N Kipf, Peter Bloem, Rianne van den Berg, Ivan Titov, and Max Welling. 2018. Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks. In European semantic web conference. Springer, 593–607.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Youngjoo Seo, Michaël Defferrard, Pierre Vandergheynst, and Xavier Bresson. 2018. Structured sequence modeling with graph convolutional recurrent networks. In International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Springer, 362–373.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Zhiqing Sun, Zhi-Hong Deng, Jian-Yun Nie, and Jian Tang. 2019. Rotate: Knowledge graph embedding by relational rotation in complex space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.10197(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rakshit Trivedi, Hanjun Dai, Yichen Wang, and Le Song. 2017. Know-evolve: Deep temporal reasoning for dynamic knowledge graphs. In international conference on machine learning. PMLR, 3462–3471.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Rakshit Trivedi, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Prasenjeet Biswal, and Hongyuan Zha. 2019. Dyrep: Learning representations over dynamic graphs. In International conference on learning representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Théo Trouillon, Johannes Welbl, Sebastian Riedel, Éric Gaussier, and Guillaume Bouchard. 2016. Complex embeddings for simple link prediction. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2071–2080.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhen Wang, Jianwen Zhang, Jianlin Feng, and Zheng Chen. 2014. Knowledge graph embedding by translating on hyperplanes. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Chenjin Xu, Mojtaba Nayyeri, Fouad Alkhoury, Hamed Yazdi, and Jens Lehmann. 2020. Temporal Knowledge Graph completion based on time series Gaussian embedding. In International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 654–671.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Bishan Yang, Wen-tau Yih, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, and Li Deng. 2014. Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6575(2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Cunchao Zhu, Muhao Chen, Changjun Fan, Guangquan Cheng, and Yan Zhan. 2020. Learning from history: Modeling temporal knowledge graphs with sequential copy-generation networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.08492(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An effective Time-Aware Encoder for Temporal Knowledge Graph Reasoning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MLNLP '22: Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing
      December 2022
      406 pages
      ISBN:9781450399067
      DOI:10.1145/3578741

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 March 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)88
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format