skip to main content
10.1145/3578741.3578817acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmlnlpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

I don’t feel so good! Detecting Depressive Tendencies using Transformer-based Multimodal Frameworks

Published:06 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

One of the most common mental illnesses that affects 5% of adults globally is depression. The advancement of social media has meant that more and more people have gained a platform to voice their thoughts and beliefs. People’s social media interactions and posted content can be used to infer critical characteristics such as depressive tendencies which will allow for timely intervention and help. This paper describes a novel supervised approach to detect depressive tendencies in Twitter users using multimodal frameworks which account for user interaction and online behaviour in addition to the tweet content processed using transformers like BERT. The performance of three multimodal frameworks is described with different methods for combining modalities. The best result is obtained a cross-modality based model which improves the baseline by 12% points.

References

  1. Kara Chan and Wei Fang. 2007. Use of the internet and traditional media among young people. Young Consumers: Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers 8 (11 2007), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/17473610710838608Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Munmun De Choudhury, Michael Gamon, Scott Counts, and Eric Horvitz. 2013. Predicting Depression via Social Media. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Munmun De Choudhury, Emre Kıcıman, Mark Dredze, Glen A. Coppersmith, and Mrinal Kumar. 2016. Discovering Shifts to Suicidal Ideation from Mental Health Content in Social Media. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Glen Coppersmith, Mark Dredze, and Craig Harman. 2014. Quantifying Mental Health Signals in Twitter. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality. Association for Computational Linguistics, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-3207Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, 4171–4186. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Guglielmo Faggioli, Nicola Ferro, Allan Hanbury, and Martin Potthast (Eds.). 2022. Proceedings of the Working Notes of CLEF 2022 - Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF). Number 3180 in CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Aachen. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3180/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruce Ferwerda and Marko Tkalcic. 2018. You Are What You Post: What the Content of Instagram Pictures Tells About Users’ Personality. In IUI Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sharath Chandra Guntuku, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, Johannes C. Eichstaedt, and Lyle H. Ungar. 2019. What Twitter Profile and Posted Images Reveal About Depression and Anxiety. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. International Conference on Learning Representations (12 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Adam M. Kremen. 1996. Depressive Tendencies and Susceptibility to Anxiety: Differential Personality Correlates. Journal of Personality 64, 1 (1996), 209–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00820.x arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00820.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kurt Kroenke, Robert L. Spitzer, and Janet B. W. Williams. 2001. The PHQ-9. Journal of General Internal Medicine 16, 9 (Sept. 2001), 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. David N. Milne, Glen Pink, Ben Hachey, and Rafael A. Calvo. 2016. CLPsych 2016 Shared Task: Triaging content in online peer-support forums. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology. Association for Computational Linguistics, San Diego, CA, USA, 118–127. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W16-0312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ricardo F. Muñoz, William R. Beardslee, and Yan Leykin. 2012. Major depression can be prevented.American Psychologist 67, 4 (2012), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027666Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. David Owen, José Camacho-Collados, and Luis Espinosa Anke. 2020. Towards Preemptive Detection of Depression and Anxiety in Twitter. CoRR abs/2011.05249(2020). arXiv:2011.05249https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.05249Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gregory J. Park, H. A. Schwartz, Johannes C. Eichstaedt, Margaret L. Kern, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Lyle H. Ungar, and M. Seligman. 2015. Automatic personality assessment through social media language.Journal of personality and social psychology 108 6 (2015), 934–52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Harold Alan Pincus, Deborah A. Zarin, and Michael First. 1998. "Clinical Significance" and DSM-IV. Archives of General Psychiatry 55, 12 (12 1998), 1145–1145. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.55.12.1145 arXiv:https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/articlepdf/204490/ylt1298.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Andrew G. Reece, Andrew J. Reagan, Katharina Lix, Peter Sheridan Dodds, Christopher M. Danforth, and Ellen J. Langer. 2017. Forecasting the onset and course of mental illness with Twitter data. Scientific Reports 7(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ramin Safa, Peyman Bayat, and Leila Moghtader. 2022. Automatic detection of depression symptoms in twitter using multimodal analysis. The Journal of Supercomputing 78 (03 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-04040-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention Is All You Need. CoRR abs/1706.03762(2017). arXiv:1706.03762http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is All You Need. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Long Beach, California, USA) (NIPS’17). Curran Associates Inc., 6000–6010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ma-Li Wong and Julio Licinio. 2001. Research and treatment approaches to depression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 5 (01 May 2001), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1038/35072566Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Shweta Yadav, Jainish Chauhan, Joy Prakash Sain, Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan, Amit Sheth, and Jeremiah Schumm. 2020. Identifying Depressive Symptoms from Tweets: Figurative Language Enabled Multitask Learning Framework. CoRR abs/2011.06149(2020). arXiv:2011.06149https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.06149Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Andrew Yates, Arman Cohan, and Nazli Goharian. 2017. Depression and Self-Harm Risk Assessment in Online Forums. CoRR abs/1709.01848(2017). arXiv:1709.01848http://arxiv.org/abs/1709.01848Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Jianlong Zhou, Hamad Zogan, Shuiqiao Yang, Shoaib Jameel, Guandong Xu, and Fang Chen. 2021. Detecting Community Depression Dynamics Due to COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems PP (01 2021), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2020.3047604Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. I don’t feel so good! Detecting Depressive Tendencies using Transformer-based Multimodal Frameworks

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            MLNLP '22: Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing
            December 2022
            406 pages
            ISBN:9781450399067
            DOI:10.1145/3578741

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 6 March 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)54
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format