skip to main content
research-article

User-based Hierarchical Network of Sina Weibo Emotion Analysis

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 May 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Emotion analysis on Sina Weibo has a great impetus for government agencies to survey public opinion and enterprises to track market demand. Most of the existing emotion analysis work on Sina Weibo focuses on mining the information contained in a single Weibo, ignoring the problem of inaccurate information extraction caused by the lack of contextual information in Weibo texts. Inspired by humans judging user emotional states from Weibo texts, this article creates a Weibo text five-category emotion classification dataset based on active users and proposes a user-based hierarchical network for Weibo emotion analysis. First, use the multi-head attention mechanism and convolutional neural network set in the information extraction module to analyze a single Weibo text to fully extract the emotional information contained in the text; at the same time, through the moving window set in the relevant information capture module, obtain other Weibo texts posted by the same user within a period, and capture the effective correlation information between Weibo texts; then, the dual text representation obtained above is concatenated, and through the information interaction layer, the relevant information is retrieved again, and the text representation is updated; finally, the classifier output the five-category emotion labels corresponding to each Weibo text. We demonstrate the model’s effectiveness through experiments and analysis in the results.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Alali Muath, Sharef Nurfadhlina Mohd, Hamdan Hazlina, Murad Masrah Azrifah Azmi, and Husin Nor Azura. 2018. Multi-layers convolutional neural network for twitter sentiment ordinal scale classification. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Soft Computing and Data Mining. Springer, 446454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. [2] Balazs Jorge A. and Velásquez Juan D.. 2016. Opinion mining and information fusion: A survey. Info. Fusion 27 (2016), 95110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. [3] Bertot John Carlo, Jaeger Paul T., and Hansen Derek. 2012. The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Govern. Info. Quart. 29, 1 (2012), 3040.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4] Bickerstaffe Adrian and Zukerman Ingrid. 2010. A hierarchical classifier applied to multi-way sentiment detection. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING’10). 6270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. [5] Camacho-Collados Jose and Pilehvar Mohammad Taher. 2017. On the role of text preprocessing in neural network architectures: An evaluation study on text categorization and sentiment analysis. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1707.01780.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [6] Chatterjee Ankush, Gupta Umang, Chinnakotla Manoj Kumar, Srikanth Radhakrishnan, Galley Michel, and Agrawal Puneet. 2019. Understanding emotions in text using deep learning and big data. Comput. Hum. Behav. 93 (2019), 309317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. [7] Chen Kun, Kou Gang, Shang Jennifer, and Chen Yang. 2015. Visualizing market structure through online product reviews: Integrate topic modeling, TOPSIS, and multi-dimensional scaling approaches. Electr. Comm. Res. Appl. 14, 1 (2015), 5874.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8] Chen Yahui. 2015. Convolutional neural network for sentence classification. Master’s Thesis. University of Waterloo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [9] Conneau Alexis, Schwenk Holger, Barrault Loıc, and Lecun Yann. 2016. Very deep convolutional networks for natural language processing. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1606.01781.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [10] Ekman Paul. 2004. Emotions revealed. Bmj 328, Suppl S5 (2004).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Go Alec, Huang Lei, and Bhayani Richa. 2009. Twitter sentiment analysis. Entropy 17 (2009), 252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] Zheng J. H., Guo S. Z., Gao L., and Zhao N.. 2018. Microblog users’ Big-Five personality prediction based on multi-task learning. J. Univ. Chinese Acad. Sci. 35, 4 (2018), 550.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] Hameed Zabit and Garcia-Zapirain Begonya. 2020. Sentiment classification using a single-layered BiLSTM model. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 7399274001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14] Hao Ming, Xu Bo, Liang Jing-Yi, Zhang Bo-Wen, and Yin Xu-Cheng. 2020. Chinese short text classification with mutual-attention convolutional neural networks. ACM Trans. Asian Low-Res. Lang. Info. Process. 19, 5 (2020), 113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. [15] Jabreel Mohammed and Moreno Antonio. 2019. A deep learning-based approach for multi-label emotion classification in tweets. Appl. Sci. 9, 6 (2019), 1123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Jinhuakst. 2018. weibo_senti_100k Dataset. https://github.com/SophonPlus/ChineseNlpCorpus/blob/master/datasets/weibo_senti_100k.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. [17] Kaggle. 2015. Twitter-airline-sentiment Dataset. Retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/crowdflower/twitter-airline-sentiment.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [18] Kalchbrenner Nal, Grefenstette Edward, and Blunsom Phil. 2014. A convolutional neural network for modelling sentences. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1404.2188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. [19] Kalchbrenner Nal, Grefenstette Edward, and Blunsom Phil. 2014. A convolutional neural network for modelling sentences. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1404.2188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [20] Keshavarz Hamidreza and Abadeh Mohammad Saniee. 2017. ALGA: Adaptive lexicon learning using genetic algorithm for sentiment analysis of microblogs. Knowl.-based Syst. 122 (2017), 116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. [21] Khan Farhan Hassan, Qamar Usman, and Bashir Saba. 2016. eSAP: A decision support framework for enhanced sentiment analysis and polarity classification. Info. Sci. 367 (2016), 862873.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. [22] King Gary, Schneer Benjamin, and White Ariel. 2017. How the news media activate public expression and influence national agendas. Science 358, 6364 (2017), 776780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Lan Yan-Fei, Liu Yan-Kui, and Sun Gao-Ji. 2009. Modeling fuzzy multi-period production planning and sourcing problem with credibility service levels. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 231, 1 (2009), 208221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. [24] Le Tuan Anh, Moeljadi David, Miura Yasuhide, and Ohkuma Tomoko. 2016. Sentiment analysis for low resource languages: A study on informal Indonesian tweets. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Asian Language Resources (ALR’12). 123131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25] Lee Anthony J. T., Yang Fu-Chen, Chen Chao-Hung, Wang Chun-Sheng, and Sun Chih-Yuan. 2016. Mining perceptual maps from consumer reviews. Decis. Supp. Syst. 82 (2016), 1225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. [26] Li Xianyong, Zhang Jiabo, Du Yajun, Zhu Jian, Fan Yongquan, and Chen Xiaoliang. 2022. A novel deep learning-based sentiment analysis method enhanced with emojis in microblog social networks. Enterprise Info. Syst. (2022), 122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. [27] Lim Wei Lun, Ho Chiung Ching, and Ting Choo-Yee. 2020. Sentiment analysis by fusing text and location features of geo-tagged tweets. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 181014181027.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. [28] Ling Mingjie, Chen Qiaohong, Sun Qi, and Jia Yubo. 2020. Hybrid neural network for Sina Weibo sentiment analysis. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 7, 4 (2020), 983990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Liu Chuchu, Fang Fan, Lin Xu, Cai Tie, Tan Xu, Liu Jianguo, and Lu Xin. 2021. Improving sentiment analysis accuracy with emoji embedding. J. Safety Sci. Resil. 2, 4 (2021), 246252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. [30] Liu Yang, Bi Jian-Wu, and Fan Zhi-Ping. 2017. A method for multi-class sentiment classification based on an improved one-vs-one (OVO) strategy and the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm. Info. Sci. 394 (2017), 3852.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. [31] Luo Tianjie, Li Ran, Sun Zhe, Tao Fuqiang, Kumar Manoj, and Li Chao. 2022. Let the big data speak: Collaborative model of topic extract and sentiment analysis COVID-19 based on weibo data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Adaptive and Intelligent Systems. Springer, 264275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. [32] NLPCC2014. 2014. NLPCC2014 Dataset. Retrieved from http://tcci.ccf.org.cn/conference/2014/pages/page04_dg.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] Olah Christopher. 2015. Understanding LSTM networks. Olah C. Understanding LSTM Networks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. [34] Phan Huyen Trang, Tran Van Cuong, Nguyen Ngoc Thanh, and Hwang Dosam. 2020. Improving the performance of sentiment analysis of tweets containing fuzzy sentiment using the feature ensemble model. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 1463014641.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. [35] Ping Liu, Zongyi Cui, Weixiang Zhou, and Yangsen Zhang. 2019. Personality prediction of Microblog user based on behavior information. J. Beijing Info. Sci. Technol. Univ.3 (2019), 3238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. [36] Ravi Kumar and Ravi Vadlamani. 2015. A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis: Tasks, approaches and applications. Knowl.-based Syst. 89 (2015), 1446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. [37] Rosenthal Sara, Farra Noura, and Nakov Preslav. 2017. SemEval-2017 task 4: Sentiment analysis in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval’17). 502518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. [38] Serrano-Guerrero Jesus, Olivas Jose A., Romero Francisco P., and Herrera-Viedma Enrique. 2015. Sentiment analysis: A review and comparative analysis of web services. Info. Sci. 311 (2015), 1838.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. [39] Shamma David A., Kennedy Lyndon, and Churchill Elizabeth F.. 2009. Tweet the debates: Understanding community annotation of uncollected sources. In Proceedings of the 1st SIGMM Workshop on Social Media. 310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. [40] Speriosu Michael, Sudan Nikita, Upadhyay Sid, and Baldridge Jason. 2011. Twitter polarity classification with label propagation over lexical links and the follower graph. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Unsupervised Learning in Natural Language Processing (NLP’11). 5363.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. [41] Sun Xiao, Zhang Chen, Li Guoqiang, Sun Daniel, Ren Fuji, Zomaya Albert, and Ranjan Rajiv. 2018. Detecting users’ anomalous emotion using social media for business intelligence. J. Comput. Sci. 25 (2018), 193200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. [42] Tang Huifeng, Tan Songbo, and Cheng Xueqi. 2009. A survey on sentiment detection of reviews. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 7 (2009), 1076010773.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. [43] Thelwall Mike, Buckley Kevan, and Paltoglou Georgios. 2012. Sentiment strength detection for the social web. J. Amer. Soc. Info. Sci. Technol. 63, 1 (2012), 163173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. [44] Thelwall Mike, Buckley Kevan, Paltoglou Georgios, Cai Di, and Kappas Arvid. 2010. Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. J. Amer. Soc. Info. Sci. Technol. 61, 12 (2010), 25442558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. [45] Tu Shifen and Yang Bo. 2021. Research on sentiment classification of micro-blog short text based on topic clustering. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1827. IOP Publishing, 012160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. [46] Vaswani Ashish, Shazeer Noam, Parmar Niki, Uszkoreit Jakob, Jones Llion, Gomez Aidan N., Kaiser Łukasz, and Polosukhin Illia. 2017. Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Info. Process. Syst. 30 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. [47] Wang Bingkun, Shan Donghong, Fan Aiwan, Liu Lei, and Gao Jingli. 2021. A sentiment classification method of web social media based on multidimensional and multilevel modeling. IEEE Trans. Industr. Info. 18, 2 (2021), 12401249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. [48] Wang Yakun, Du Yajun, Hu Jinrong, Li Xianyong, and Chen Xiaoliang. 2021. SAEP: A surrounding-aware individual emotion prediction model combined with T-LSTM and memory attention mechanism. Appl. Sci. 11, 23 (2021), 11111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. [49] Wilson Theresa, Wiebe Janyce, and Hwa Rebecca. 2006. Recognizing strong and weak opinion clauses. Comput. Intell. 22, 2 (2006), 7399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. [50] Wu Yirui, Li Hao, Zhang Lilai, Chen Dong, Huang Qian, and Wan Shaohua. 2022. Joint intent detection model for task-oriented human-computer dialogue system using asynchronous training. Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing. (2022).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. [51] Sun Xiao, Zhang Chen, and Ren. Fuji2018. User emotion modeling and anomaly detection based on social media. J. Chinese Info. Process. 32, 4 (2018), 120129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. [52] Xie Xin, Ge Songlin, Hu Fengping, Xie Mingye, and Jiang Nan. 2019. An improved algorithm for sentiment analysis based on maximum entropy. Soft Comput. 23, 2 (2019), 599611.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. [53] Xu Jiacheng, Chen Danlu, Qiu Xipeng, and Huang Xuangjing. 2016. Cached long short-term memory neural networks for document-level sentiment classification. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1610.04989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. [54] Xu Xinyan and Zhang Shunxiang. 2020. Micro-blog sentiment analysis based on emoticon preferences and emotion commonsense. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Applications and Techniques in Cyber Security and Intelligence. Springer, 838844.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. [55] Yang Wenzhong, Yuan Tingting, and Wang Liejun. 2020. Micro-blog sentiment classification method based on the personality and bagging algorithm. Future Internet 12, 4 (2020), 75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. [56] Zhang Lei, Wang Shuai, and Liu Bing. 2018. Deep learning for sentiment analysis: A survey. Wiley Interdisc. Rev.: Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 8, 4 (2018), e1253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. [57] Zhang Wenhao, Xu Hua, and Wan Wei. 2012. Weakness finder: Find product weakness from Chinese reviews by using aspects-based sentiment analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 11 (2012), 1028310291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. [58] Zhihu. 2021. Weibo Annual Report. Retrieved from https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1726279068555424418&wfr=spider&for=pc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. User-based Hierarchical Network of Sina Weibo Emotion Analysis

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
          ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing  Volume 22, Issue 5
          May 2023
          653 pages
          ISSN:2375-4699
          EISSN:2375-4702
          DOI:10.1145/3596451
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 9 May 2023
          • Online AM: 6 January 2023
          • Accepted: 25 December 2022
          • Revised: 24 October 2022
          • Received: 29 March 2022
          Published in tallip Volume 22, Issue 5

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Full Text

        View this article in Full Text.

        View Full Text