skip to main content
research-article

Crossing the Threshold: Pathways into Makerspaces for Women at the Intersectional Margins

Published:16 April 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on makerspace practices that can hinder or enable access for under-resourced women of colour who are novices to making, predominantly migrants and refugee women. We report on a 21 month long ethnographic fieldwork at nine makerspaces across two metropolitan Australian cities. The findings present barriers and opportunities around access of under-resourced women of colour into makerspaces. We present these findings through four themes: first impressions and visual representations; dimensions of the enabling environment; role of community partnerships; and intersectional identities of women. We conclude by discussing three contributions this paper makes to the HCI and CSCW literature, with supporting lessons and recommendations so that makerspaces no longer encode the involvement of only certain types of users (predominantly well-educated white males or white females), to the exclusion of women at the intersectional margins. If makerspaces can facilitate an enabling environment appropriate to be inclusive of women who face intersecting oppressions, the benefits of the maker movement can expand substantially.

References

  1. Michael Ahmadi, Anne Weibert, Victoria Wenzelmann, Konstantin Aal, Kristian Gäckle, Volker Wulf, and Nicola Marsden. 2019. Designing for Openness in Making: Lessons Learned from a Digital Project Week. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming Communities, ACM, Vienna Austria, 160--171. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3328320.3328376Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Steven J. Jackson, and Md. Rashidujjaman Rifat. 2015. Learning to fix: knowledge, collaboration and mobile phone repair in Dhaka, Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, ACM, Singapore Singapore, 1--10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2737856.2738018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Morgan G. Ames, Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Silvia Lindtner, David A. Mellis, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2014. Making cultures: empowerment, participation, and democracy - or not? In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Toronto Ontario Canada, 1087--1092. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2579405Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Tawfiq Ammari, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Silvia Lindtner. 2017. The Crafting of DIY Fatherhood. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1109--1122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998270Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Karlin Associates. 2012. An Independent Profile of Makers at the Forefront of Hardware Innovation. DOI:https://cdn.makezine.com/make/sales/Maker-Market-Study.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Angela Calabrese Barton and Edna Tan. 2019. Twinning iterative design with community cultural wealth: Toward a locally-grounded, expansive maker culture. In Proceedings of FabLearn 2019, ACM, New York NY USA, 168--171. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3311890.3311918Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ingo Karl Bosse and Bastian Pelka. 2020. Peer production by persons with disabilities -- opening 3D-printing aids to everybody in an inclusive MakerSpace. Journal of enabling technologies 14, 1 (2020), 41--53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-07--2019-0037Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Beth Buchholz, Kate Shively, Kylie Peppler, and Karen Wohlwend. 2014. Hands On, Hands Off: Gendered Access in Crafting and Electronics Practices. Mind, Culture, and Activity 21, 4 (October 2014), 278--297. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2014.939762Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Leah Buechley and Michael Eisenberg. 2009. Fabric PCBs, electronic sequins, and socket buttons: techniques for e-textile craft. Pers Ubiquit Comput 13, 2 (February 2009), 133--150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-007-0181-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Leah Buechley and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2010. LilyPad in the wild: how hardware's long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '10, ACM Press, Aarhus, Denmark, 199. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858206Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Leah Buechley and Hannah Perner-Wilson. 2012. Crafting technology: Reimagining the processes, materials, and cultures of electronics. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 3 (October 2012), 1--21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2362364.2362369Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Angela Calabrese Barton and Edna Tan. 2018. A Longitudinal Study of Equity-Oriented STEM-Rich Making Among Youth From Historically Marginalized Communities. American educational research journal 55, 4 (2018), 761--800. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218758668Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Angela Calabrese Barton and Edna Tan. 2020. Beyond Equity as Inclusion: A Framework of ?Rightful Presence" for Guiding Justice-Oriented Studies in Teaching and Learning. Educational Researcher 49, 6 (August 2020), 433--440. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20927363Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Nathalia Campreguer França, Dorothé Smit, Stefanie Wuschitz, and Verena Fuchsberger. 2021. The Women* Who Made It: Experiences from Being a Woman* at a Maker Festival. Sustainability 13, 16 (January 2021), 9361. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169361Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Tara Capel, Bernd Ploderer, Margot Brereton, and Meg O'Connor Solly. 2021. The Making of Women: Creating Trajectories for Women's Participation in Makerspaces. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1--38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3449109Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Devon W. Carbado, Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw, Vickie M. Mays, and Barbara Tomlinson. 2013. INTERSECTIONALITY: Mapping the Movements of a Theory1. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 10, 2 (ed 2013), 303--312. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000349Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Kayla Carucci and Kentaro Toyama. 2019. Making Well-being: Exploring the Role of Makerspaces in Long Term Care Facilities. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1--12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300699Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Cerna, Katerina and Müller, Claudia. 2021. Making online participatory design work: Understanding the digital ecologies of older adults. (2021). DOI:https://doi.org/10.18420/ECSCW2021_N22Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Patricia Hill Collins. 1991. Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment / Patricia Hill Collins. Routledge, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lucia Corsini and James Moultrie. 2020. Humanitarian makerspaces in crisis-affected communities. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM (2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060420000098Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Don Gibbs Davis. 2017. Novice Behavior in a Makerspace: Pragmatic Pathways to Shaping CS Identity. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Retrieved March 9, 2022 from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1906287060?pq-origsite=primoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Katrien Dreessen and Selina Schepers. 2018. Three strategies for engaging non-experts in a fablab. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, ACM, Oslo Norway, 482--493. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240195Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Danielle P. Espino, Seung B. Lee, Lauren Van Tress, Toby T. Baker, and Eric R. Hamilton. 2020. Analysis of U.S., Kenyan, and Finnish Discourse Patterns in a Cross-Cultural Digital Makerspace Learning Community Through the IBE-UNESCO Global Competences Framework. RESSAT 5, 1 (January 2020), 86--100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.05.01.5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Rachel Fiore and Marjorie Cooper. 2019. Using the Maker Movement to Forge a Middle-School Collaboration to Support English Language Learners. Science Scope 43, 1 (2019), 28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ellen K. Foster. 2019. Claims of equity and expertise: Feminist interventions in the design of DIY communities and cultures. Design Issues 35, 4 (2019), 33--41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00562Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Sarah Fox. 2015. Feminist Hackerspaces as Sites for Feminist Design. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, ACM, Glasgow United Kingdom, 341--342. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2764771Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Sarah Fox, Amanda Menking, Stephanie Steinhardt, Anna Lauren Hoffmann, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2017. Imagining Intersectional Futures. (2017), 387--393. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3022665Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sarah Fox, Rachel Rose Ulgado, and Daniela Rosner. 2015. Hacking Culture, Not Devices: Access and Recognition in Feminist Hackerspaces. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 56--68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675223Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. David Green and David Kirk. 2018. Open Design, Inclusivity and the Intersections of Making. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, ACM, Hong Kong China, 173--186. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196718Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Thilina Halloluwa, Pradeepa Bandara, Hakim Usoof, and Dhaval Vyas. 2018. Value for money: co-designing with underbanked women from rural Sri Lanka. In Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, ACM, Melbourne Australia, 63--73. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292157Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Foad Hamidi and Melanie Baljko. 2015. Makers with a Cause: Fabrication, Reflection and Community Collaboration. In Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions, Norbert Streitz and Panos Markopoulos (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 49--61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--20804--6_5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Sang Yeal Han, Jaeheung Yoo, Hangjung Zo, and Andrew P. Ciganek. 2017. Understanding makerspace continuance: A self-determination perspective. Telematics and Informatics 34, 4 (2017), 184--195. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.02.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sonali Hedditch and Dhaval Vyas. 2021. A Gendered Perspective on Making from an Autoethnography in Makerspaces. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1887--1901. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462015Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Patricia Hill Collins. 2016. Intersectionality / Patricia Hill Collins, Sirma Bilge. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK?; Malden, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Julia Himmelsbach, Stephanie Schwarz, Cornelia Gerdenitsch, Beatrix Wais-Zechmann, Jan Bobeth, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2019. Do We Care About Diversity in Human Computer Interaction: A Comprehensive Content Analysis on Diversity Dimensions in Research. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1--16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300720Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Avneet Hira and Morgan M. Hynes. 2018. People, Means, and Activities: A Conceptual Framework for Realizing the Educational Potential of Makerspaces. Education Research International 2018, (2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6923617Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Anja-Lisa Hirscher. 2022. ?Hey, I can do that too!': How skilful participation thrives in a co-sewing café. CoDesign 18, 2 (April 2022), 243--259. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1823994Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Alexis Hope, Catherine D'Ignazio, Josephine Hoy, Rebecca Michelson, Jennifer Roberts, Kate Krontiris, and Ethan Zuckerman. 2019. Hackathons as Participatory Design: Iterating Feminist Utopias. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1--14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300291Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Steven J. Jackson, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, and Md. Rashidujjaman Rifat. 2014. Learning, innovation, and sustainability among mobile phone repairers in Dhaka, Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems, ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 905--914. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598576Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Jennifer Jacobs and Leah Buechley. 2013. Codeable objects: computational design and digital fabrication for novice programmers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Paris France, 1589--1598. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466211Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Lee Jones, Meghrik Isagholi, Elizabeth Meiklejohn, Snow Xu, Kara Truskolawski, Jessica Hayon, Grace Jun, Pinar Guvenc, and Christina Mallon-Michalove. 2020. Hack-Ability: Using Co-Design to Develop an Accessible Toolkit for Adding Pockets to Garments. In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 2, ACM, Manizales Colombia, 95--99. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385124Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Lee Jones, Sara Nabil, Amanda McLeod, and Audrey Girouard. 2020. Wearable Bits: Scaffolding Creativity with a Prototyping Toolkit for Wearable E-textiles. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, ACM, Sydney NSW Australia, 165--177. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374954Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Anna Keune, Kylie A. Peppler, and Karen E. Wohlwend. 2019. Recognition in makerspaces: Supporting opportunities for women to ?make" a STEM career. Computers in human behavior 99, (2019), 368--380. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Beth Kolko, Alexis Hope, Brook Sattler, Kate MacCorkle, and Behzod Sirjani. 2012. Hackademia: building functional rather than accredited engineers. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference on Research Papers: Volume 1 - PDC '12, ACM Press, Roskilde, Denmark, 129. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2347635.2347654Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Neha Kumar and Naveena Karusala. 2019. Intersectional computing. interactions 26, 2 (February 2019), 50--54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3305360Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Silvia Lindtner, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2016. Reconstituting the Utopian Vision of Making: HCI After Technosolutionism. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, San Jose California USA, 1390--1402. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858506Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Cayley Macarthur, Caroline Wong, and Mark Hancock. 2019. Makers and quilters: Investigating opportunities for improving gender-imbalanced maker groups. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Cayley MacArthur, Caroline Wong, and Mark Hancock. 2019. Makers and Quilters: Investigating Opportunities for Improving Gender-Imbalanced Maker Groups. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW (November 2019), 1--24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3359131Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. David A. Mellis, Leah Buechley, Mitchel Resnick, and Björn Hartmann. 2016. Engaging Amateurs in the Design, Fabrication, and Assembly of Electronic Devices. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM, Brisbane QLD Australia, 1270--1281. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901833Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Johanna Okerlund, Madison Dunaway, Celine Latulipe, David Wilson, and Eric Paulos. 2018. Statement Making: A Maker Fashion Show Foregrounding Feminism, Gender, and Transdisciplinarity. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, ACM, Hong Kong China, 187--199. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196754Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Chaeah Park and Pirkko Siklander. 2018. Triggering Women's Interest in Digital Fabrication. In Proceedings of the Conference on Creativity and Making in Education, ACM, Trondheim Norway, 95--96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3213818.3213831Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Hannah Perner-Wilson and Leah Buechley. 2010. Making textile sensors from scratch. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction - TEI '10, ACM Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 349. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1709886.1709972Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Irene Posch, Daniela K. Rosner, Amit Zoran, Ozge Subasi, Raune Frankjaer, and Tania Pérez-Bustos. 2019. Troubling innovation: Craft and computing across boundaries. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2019), 1--8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299010Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Yolanda A. Rankin and Jakita O. Thomas. 2019. Straighten up and fly right: rethinking intersectionality in HCI research. interactions 26, 6 (October 2019), 64--68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3363033Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Yolanda A. Rankin and Jakita O. Thomas. 2020. The intersectional experiences of blackwomen in computing. Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 1 (2020), 199--205. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366873Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Upul Anuradha Rathnayake, Thilina Halloluwa, Pradeepa Bandara, Medhani Narasinghe, and Dhaval Vyas. 2021. Exploring Entrepreneurial Activities in Marginalized Widows: A Case from Rural Sri Lanka. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1--24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3449216Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Daniela K Rosner and Sarah E Fox. 2016. Legacies of craft and the centrality of failure in a mother-operated hackerspace. New Media & Society 18, 4 (April 2016), 558--580. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816629468Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Daniela K. Rosner and Kimiko Ryokai. 2009. Reflections on craft: probing the creative process of everyday knitters. In Proceeding of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition - C&C '09, ACM Press, Berkeley, California, USA, 195. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1640233.1640264Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Daniela K. Rosner, Samantha Shorey, Brock R. Craft, and Helen Remick. 2018. Making Core Memory: Design Inquiry into Gendered Legacies of Engineering and Craftwork. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1--13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174105Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Rachel Kaminski Sanders, Theodore J Kopcha, Kalianne L Neumann, Kristin Brynteson, Carrie Bishop, Rachel Kaminski Sanders, and Carrie Bishop. 2019. Maker ' s Workshop?: a Framework to Support Learning through Making are negotiated and renegotiated multiple times over the course. TechTrends (2019), 386--396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Ari Schlesinger, W. Keith Edwards, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging identity through gender, race, and class. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 2017-May, (2017), 5412--5427. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025766Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Sherry Schofield-Tomschin and Mary A. Littrell. 2001. Textile Handcraft Guild Participation: A Conduit to Successful Aging. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 19, 2 (March 2001), 41--51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X0101900201Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. JooYoung Seo. 2019. Is the Maker Movement Inclusive of ANYONE?: Three Accessibility Considerations to Invite Blind Makers to the Making World. TechTrends 63, 5 (September 2019), 514--520. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00377--3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Oliver Stickel, Dominik Hornung, Konstantin Aal, Markus Rohde, and Volker Wulf. 2015. 3D Printing with Marginalized Children-An Exploration in a Palestinian Refugee Camp. In ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19--23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway, Nina Boulus-Rødje, Gunnar Ellingsen, Tone Bratteteig, Margunn Aanestad and Pernille Bjørn (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 83--102. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--20499--4_5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Angelika Strohmayer and Janis Meissner. 2017. "We had tough times, but we've sort of sewn our way through it: the partnership quilt. XRDS 24, 2 (December 2017), 48--51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3155128Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Edna Tan and Angela Calabrese Barton. 2007. Unpacking science for all through the lens of identities-in-practice: the stories of Amelia and Ginny. Cultural studies of science education 3, 1 (2007), 43--71. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-007--9076--7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Edna Tan and Angela Calabrese Barton. 2017. Designing for rightful presence in STEM-rich making: Community ethnography as pedagogy. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education, ACM, Stanford CA USA, 1--8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3141798.3141807Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Edna Tan and Angela Calabrese Barton. 2018. Towards Critical Justice: Exploring Intersectionality in Community-based STEM-rich Making with Youth from Non-dominant Communities. Equity & excellence in education 51, 1 (2018), 48--61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2018.1439786Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Edna Tan, Angela Calabrese Barton, Hosun Kang, and Tara O'Neill. 2013. Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. Journal of research in science teaching 50, 10 (2013), 1143--1179. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21123Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Theresa Jean Tanenbaum, Amanda M. Williams, Audrey Desjardins, and Karen Tanenbaum. 2013. Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Paris France, 2603--2612. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481360Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Jennyfer Lawrence Taylor, Dhaval Vyas, and Tony Sharp. 2017. Diversity and coherence in a hackerspace for people from a low socioeconomic community. In Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, ACM, Brisbane Queensland Australia, 238--247. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3152771.3152797Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Nick Taylor, Loraine Clarke, and Katerina Gorkovenko. 2017. Community Inventor Days. 2, 01 (2017), 1201--1212. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064723Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Nick Taylor, Ursula Hurley, and Philip Connolly. 2016. Making Community: The Wider Role of Makerspaces in Public Life. CHI 2016: (Re)understanding Making: A Critical Broadening of Maker Cultures (2016), 1415--1425.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Jakita O. Thomas, Nicole Joseph, Arian Williams, Chan'tel Crum, and Jamika Burge. 2018. Speaking Truth to Power: Exploring the Intersectional Experiences of Black Women in Computing. In 2018 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), IEEE, Baltimore, MD, USA, 1--8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2018.8491718Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Megan Tomko, Melissa W. Alemán, Wendy Newstetter, Robert L. Nagel, and Julie Linsey. 2021. Participation pathways for women into university makerspaces. Journal of Engineering Education 110, 3 (2021), 700--717. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20402Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Austin Toombs, Colin Gray, Guoyang Zhou, and Ann Light. 2018. Appropriated or Inauthentic Care in Gig-Economy Platforms: A Psycho-linguistic Analysis of Uber and Lyft. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1--6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188657Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Shirin Vossoughi, Paula K. Hooper, and Meg Escudé. 2016. Making Through the Lens of Culture and Power: Toward Transformative Visions for Educational Equity. Harvard Educational Review 86, 2 (June 2016), 206--232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17763/0017--8055.86.2.206Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Dhaval Vyas. 2019. Altruism and wellbeing as care work in a craft-based maker culture. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, GROUP (2019). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3361120Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Dhaval Vyas and John Vines. 2019. Making at the Margins: Making in an Under-resourced e-Waste Recycling Center. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW (November 2019), 1--23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3359290Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Tara Whelan. 2018. We are not all makers: The paradox of plurality in the maker movement. DIS 2018 - Companion Publication of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2018), 75--80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3197391.3205451Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Danielle Wilde and Patrizia Marti. 2018. Exploring Aesthetic Enhancement of Wearable Technologies for Deaf Women. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, ACM, Hong Kong China, 201--213. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196777Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. 2021. Migration, Australia, 2019--20 financial year | Australian Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved July 3, 2022 from https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/migration-australia/latest-releaseGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Crossing the Threshold: Pathways into Makerspaces for Women at the Intersectional Margins

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 7, Issue CSCW1
      CSCW
      April 2023
      3836 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3593053
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 April 2023
      Published in pacmhci Volume 7, Issue CSCW1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader