Evey Jiaxin Huang
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
One-to-many coaching is a common, yet difficult, coaching technique used in environments with many novices learning to solve ill-defined problems. Intelligent systems might be designed to support 1-to-many coaching but designing such systems requires a 1-to-many coaching model that details novices' challenges, coaches' strategies, and coaches' goals. To build such a model, we conducted interaction analysis on 24 1-to-many coaching sessions with novices developing new products in a university incubator and conducted retrospective analyses with 3 coaches and 30 novices. We contribute a model that demonstrates that coaches in a 1-to-many setting not only need to help novices develop metacognitive skills (just as in 1-to-1 coaching), but also need to utilize the presence and expertise of a group of novices to learn from each other, to mitigate their fear of failures, and provide them accountability. Our model informs design implications for future intelligent coaching systems to (1) assist coaches in monitoring and comparing many novices' progress, learning, and expertise; (2) provide novices with checklists, templates, and scaffolds to help them self-evaluate, seek-help, and summarize learning; (3) showcase failures and growth; and (4) publicize planning and progress to provide accountability.
- Mark S. Ackerman. 2000. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human--Computer Interaction 15, 2--3 (Sept. 2000), 179--203. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_5Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mark S. Ackerman, Juri Dachtera, Volkmar Pipek, and Volker Wulf. 2013. Sharing Knowledge and Expertise: The CSCW View of Knowledge Management. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 22, 4--6 (Aug. 2013), 531--573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-013--9192--8Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. S. Ackerman and T. W. Malone. 1990. Answer Garden: a tool for growing organizational memory. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGOIS and IEEE CS TC-OA conference on Office information systems (COCS '90). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 31--39. https://doi.org/10.1145/91474.91485Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark S. Ackerman and David W. McDonald. 1996. Answer Garden 2: merging organizational memory with collaborative help. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '96). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 97--105. https://doi.org/10.1145/240080.240203Google ScholarDigital Library
- Susan A. Ambrose, Michael W. Bridges, Michele DiPietro, Marsha C. Lovett, and Marie K. Norman. 2010. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, US. Pages: xxii, 301.Google Scholar
- Marcela Borge, Craig H. Ganoe, Shin-I Shih, and John M. Carroll. 2012. Patterns of team processes and breakdowns in information analysis tasks. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1105--1114. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145369Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rodney Brooks, William Scott Green, R. Glenn Hubbard, Dipak C. Jain, Linda Katehi, George McLendon, James Plummer, Myron Roomkin, and Richard Newton. 2007. Entrepreneurship in American Higher Education. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1291290. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1291290Google ScholarCross Ref
- C.J. Butz, S. Hua, and R.B. Maguire. 2004. A Web-Based Intelligent Tutoring System for Computer Programming. In IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'04). 159--165. https://doi.org/10.1109/WI.2004.10104Google ScholarCross Ref
- Spencer E. Carlson, Daniel G. Rees Lewis, Leesha V. Maliakal, Elizabeth M. Gerber, and Matthew W. Easterday. 2020. The design risks framework: Understanding metacognition for iteration. Design Studies 70 (Sept. 2020), 100961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.100961Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joel Chan, Steven Dang, and Steven P Dow. 2016. Improving crowd innovation with expert facilitation. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, Vol. 27. 1223--1235. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820023Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chun-Wei Chiang, Anna Kasunic, and Saiph Savage. 2018. Crowd Coach: Peer Coaching for Crowd Workers' Skill Growth. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 37:1--37:17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274306Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bart Clarysse, Mike Wright, and Jonas Van Hove. 2016. A Look Inside Accelerators in the United Kingdom: Building Technology Businesses. In Technology Entrepreneurship and Business Incubation. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781783269778_0003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Allan Collins, John Seely Brown, and Susan E. Newman. 1989. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ, US, 453--494.Google Scholar
- A. Corbin, J. & Strauss. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th Edition). arXiv:1011.1669Google Scholar
- P. G. Dodgson and J. V. Wood. 1998. Self-esteem and the cognitive accessibility of strengths and weaknesses after failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75, 1 (July 1998), 178--197. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022--3514.75.1.178Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matthew W. Easterday, Elizabeth M. Gerber, and Daniel G. Rees Lewis. 2018. Social Innovation Networks: A New Approach to Social Design Education and Impact. Design Issues 34, 2 (April 2018), 64--76. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00486 Conference Name: Design Issues.Google ScholarCross Ref
- BJ Fogg. 2009. A behavior model for persuasive design. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (Persuasive '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--7. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541999Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eureka Foong, Steven P. Dow, Brian P. Bailey, and Elizabeth M. Gerber. 2017. Online Feedback Exchange: A Framework for Understanding the Socio-Psychological Factors. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4454--4467. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025791Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eureka Foong, Joy O. Kim, Mira Dontcheva, and Elizabeth M. Gerber. 2021. CrowdFolio: Understanding How Holistic and Decomposed Workflows Influence Feedback on Online Portfolios. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 22:1--22:31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449096Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gensler. 2021. The Rise of Academic Incubators. https://www.gensler.com/blog/the-rise-of-academic-incubatorsGoogle Scholar
- Elizabeth Gerber. 2014. Design for America: Organizing for Civic Innovation. Interactions 21 (March 2014), 42--47. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567840Google ScholarDigital Library
- Debra M. Gilbuena, Benjamin U. Sherrett, Edith S. Gummer, Audrey B. Champagne, and Milo D. Koretsky. 2015. Feedback on Professional Skills as Enculturation into Communities of Practice. Journal of Engineering Education 104, 1 (2015), 7--34. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20061 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jee.20061.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jonathan Grudin. 1988. Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work - CSCW '88. ACM Press, Portland, Oregon, United States, 85--93. https://doi.org/10.1145/62266.62273Google ScholarDigital Library
- Philip J. Guo. 2015. Codeopticon: Real-Time, One-To-Many Human Tutoring for Computer Programming. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (UIST '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 599--608. https://doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807469Google ScholarDigital Library
- Allyson Hadwin, Sanna Järvelä, and Mariel Miller. 2017. Self-Regulation, Co-Regulation, and Shared Regulation in Collaborative Learning Environments. In Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (2 ed.), Dale H. Schunk and Jeffrey A. Greene (Eds.). Routledge, 83--106. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048--6Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hazel Hall and Brian Davison. 2007. Social software as support in hybrid learning environments: The value of the blog as a tool for reflective learning and peer support. Library & Information Science Research 29, 2 (June 2007), 163--187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.04.007Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver. 2004. Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review 16, 3 (Sept. 2004), 235--266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver and Howard S. Barrows. 2006. Goals and Strategies of a Problem-based Learning Facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 1, 1 (May 2006). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541--5015.1004Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver and Howard S. Barrows. 2008. Facilitating Collaborative Knowledge Building. Cognition and Instruction 26, 1 (Jan. 2008), 48--94. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701798495 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701798495.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tom Hope, Doug Downey, Oren Etzioni, Daniel S. Weld, and Eric Horvitz. 2022. A Computational Inflection for Scientific Discovery. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.02007 arXiv:2205.02007 [cs].Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eric Horvitz. 1999. Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (1999), 159--166. https://doi.org/10.1145/302979.303030 ISBN: 0201485591.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Julie S. Hui, Darren Gergle, and Elizabeth M. Gerber. 2018. IntroAssist: A Tool to Support Writing Introductory Help Requests. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173596Google ScholarDigital Library
- Edwin Hutchins. 1995. How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds. Cognitive Science 19, 3 (1995), 265--288. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Jonassen, Johannes Strobel, and Chwee Beng Lee. 2006. Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators. Journal of Engineering Education 95, 2 (2006), 139--151. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168--9830.2006.tb00885.x _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2168--9830.2006.tb00885.x.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David H. Jonassen and Woei Hung. 2008. All Problems are Not Equal: Implications for Problem-Based Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 2, 2 (Oct. 2008). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541--5015.1080Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brigitte Jordan and Austin Henderson. 1995. Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences 4, 1 (Jan. 1995), 39--103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joy Kim, Avi Bagla, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2015. Designing Creativity Support Tools for Failure. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 157--160. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2764542Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kenneth R. Koedinger, Emma Brunskill, Ryan S.J.d. Baker, Elizabeth A. McLaughlin, and John Stamper. 2013. New Potentials for Data-Driven Intelligent Tutoring System Development and Optimization. AI Magazine 34, 3 (Sept. 2013), 27--41. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v34i3.2484Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chinmay Kulkarni, Michael S. Bernstein, and Scott Klemmer. 2015. PeerStudio: Rapid peer feedback emphasizes revision and improves performance. In L@S 2015 - 2nd ACM Conference on Learning at Scale. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, New York, NY, USA, 75--84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724670Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vivian Lai, Chacha Chen, Q. Vera Liao, Alison Smith-Renner, and Chenhao Tan. 2021. Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: A Survey of Empirical Studies. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.11471 arXiv:2112.11471 [cs].Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marianna Lamnina, Helena Connolly, and V. Aleven. 2018. The Invention Coach: A computer-based environment that supports the transfer of STEM concepts. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2017.pr.052Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Richard Landis and Gary G. Koch. 1977. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33, 1 (1977), 159--174. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2529310 Publisher: [Wiley, International Biometric Society].Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chunggi Lee, Sanghoon Kim, Dongyun Han, Hongjun Yang, Young-Woo Park, Bum Chul Kwon, and Sungahn Ko. 2020. GUIComp: A GUI Design Assistant with Real-Time, Multi-Faceted Feedback. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376327Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yoonjoo Lee, John Joon Young Chung, Tae Soo Kim, Jean Y Song, and Juho Kim. 2022. Promptiverse: Scalable Generation of Scaffolding Prompts Through Human-AI Hybrid Knowledge Graph Annotation. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502087Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marcia Linn, Kevin McElhaney, Libby Gerard, and Camillia Matuk. 2018. Inquiry learning and opportunities for technology.Google Scholar
- Ching Liu, Juho Kim, and Hao-Chuan Wang. 2018. ConceptScape: Collaborative Concept Mapping for Video Learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173961Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marsha C. Lovett. 1998. Cognitive Task Analysis in Service of Intelligent Tutoring System Design: A Case Study in Statistics. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Barry P. Goettl, Henry M. Halff, Carol L. Redfield, and Valerie J. Shute (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 234--243. https://doi.org/10.1007/3--540--68716--5_29Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jingyan Lu, Susan Bridges, and Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver. 2014. Problem-based learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.019Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kurt Luther and Amy Bruckman. 2008. Leadership in online creative collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 343--352. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460619Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kurt Luther, Casey Fiesler, and Amy Bruckman. 2013. Redistributing leadership in online creative collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1007--1022. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441891Google ScholarDigital Library
- Collin F Lynch, Kevin D Ashley, Vincent Aleven, and Niels Pinkwart. 2006. Defining ?Ill-Defined Domains"; A literature survey. (2006), 10.Google Scholar
- Thomas W. Malone. 2018. How Human-Computer 'Superminds' Are Redefining the Future of Work. MIT Sloan Management Review 59, 4 (2018), 34--41. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2057250594/abstract/191CBE32E9BE490BPQ/1 Num Pages: 34--41 Place: Cambridge, United States Publisher: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA Section: COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE.Google Scholar
- David W. McDonald and Mark S. Ackerman. 2000. Expertise recommender: a flexible recommendation system and architecture. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 231--240. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.358994Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert C. Miller, Haoqi Zhang, Eric Gilbert, and Elizabeth Gerber. 2014. Pair research: matching people for collaboration, learning, and productivity. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1043--1048. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531703Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elliot Mitchell, Noemie Elhadad, and Lena Mamykina. 2022. Examining AI Methods for Micro-Coaching Dialogs. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501886Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elliot G. Mitchell, Rosa Maimone, Andrea Cassells, Jonathan N. Tobin, Patricia Davidson, Arlene M. Smaldone, and Lena Mamykina. 2021. Automated vs. Human Health Coaching: Exploring Participant and Practitioner Experiences. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 99:1--99:37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449173Google ScholarDigital Library
- Molly Jane Nicholas, Sarah Sterman, and Eric Paulos. 2022. Creative and Motivational Strategies Used by Expert Creative Practitioners. In Creativity and Cognition (C&C '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 323--335. https://doi.org/10.1145/3527927.3532870Google ScholarDigital Library
- Judith Odili Uchidiuno, Jessica Hammer, Ken Koedinger, and Amy Ogan. 2021. Fostering Equitable Help-Seeking for K-3 Students in Low Income and Rural Contexts. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Number 684. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445144Google ScholarDigital Library
- Charlotte Pauwels, Bart Clarysse, Mike Wright, and Jonas Van Hove. 2016. Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation 50--51 (apr 2016), 13--24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel Rees Lewis, Elizabeth Gerber, Spencer Carlson, and Matthew Easterday. 2019. Opportunities for educational innovations in authentic project-based learning: understanding instructor perceived challenges to design for adoption. Educational Technology Research and Development 67 (May 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09673--4Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel Rees Lewis, Elizabeth Gerber, and Matthew Easterday. 2019. Assessing Iterative Planning for Real-world Design Teams. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20452.83840Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel Rees Lewis, Jamie Gorson, Leesha Maliakal, Spencer Carlson, Elizabeth Gerber, Matthew Easterday, and Christopher Riesbeck. 2018. Planning to Iterate: Supporting Iterative Practices for Real-world Ill-structured Problem-solving. Presented at the 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, London, 2018.Google Scholar
- Horst W. J. Rittel and Melvin M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences 4, 2 (1973), 155--169. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4531523 Publisher: Springer.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Donald A. Schon. 1987. Teaching artistry through reflection in action.Google Scholar
- Richard A. Schwier. 2010. Focusing Educational Technology Research on Informal Learning Environments. Contemporary Educational Technology 1, 1 (March 2010). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/5965Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amy Shannon, Jessica Hammer, H. Thurston, Natalie Diehl, and Steven Dow. 2016. PeerPresents: A Web-Based System for In-Class Peer Feedback during Student Presentations. Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901816Google ScholarDigital Library
- Herbert A. Simon. 1977. The Structure of Ill-Structured Problems. In Models of Discovery: And Other Topics in the Methods of Science, Herbert A. Simon (Ed.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 304--325. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--94-010--9521--1_17Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ryo Suzuki, Niloufar Salehi, Michelle S. Lam, Juan C. Marroquin, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2016. Atelier: Repurposing Expert Crowdsourcing Tasks as Micro-internships. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2645--2656. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858121Google ScholarDigital Library
- Colby Tofel-Grehl and David F. Feldon. 2013. Cognitive Task Analysis--Based Training: A Meta-Analysis of Studies. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 7, 3 (Sept. 2013), 293--304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343412474821 Publisher: SAGE Publications.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cesar Torres, Sarah Sterman, Molly Nicholas, Richard Lin, Eric Pai, and Eric Paulos. 2018. Guardians of Practice: A Contextual Inquiry of Failure-Mitigation Strategies within Creative Practices. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1259--1267. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196795Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kurt VanLehn, Collin Lynch, Kay Schulze, Joel A. Shapiro, Robert Shelby, Linwood Taylor, Don Treacy, Anders Weinstein, and Mary Wintersgill. 2005. The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Lessons Learned. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 15, 3 (Jan. 2005), 147--204. https://content.iospress.com/articles/international-journal-of-artificial-intelligence-in-education/jai15--3-02 Publisher: IOS Press.Google Scholar
- Madhurima Vardhan, Narayan Hegde, Srujana Merugu, Shantanu Prabhat, Deepak Nathani, Martin Seneviratne, Nur Muhammad, Pranay Reddy, Sriram Lakshminarasimhan, Rahul Singh, Karina Lorenzana, Eshan Motwani, Partha Talukdar, and Aravindan Raghuveer. 2022. Walking with PACE - Personalized and Automated Coaching Engine. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 57--68. https://doi.org/10.1145/3503252.3531301Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maria Virvou, Christos Troussas, and Sotirios-Christos Sidiropoulos. 2012. Collaborative Support in a Multilingual Tutoring System. In 2012 Eighth International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing. 502--505. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIH-MSP.2012.127Google ScholarDigital Library
- Erin Walker, Nikol Rummel, and Kenneth R. Koedinger. 2014. Adaptive Intelligent Support to Improve Peer Tutoring in Algebra. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 24, 1 (Jan. 2014), 33--61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-013-0001--9Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thiemo Wambsganss, Tobias Kueng, Matthias Soellner, and Jan Marco Leimeister. 2021. ArgueTutor: An Adaptive Dialog-Based Learning System for Argumentation Skills. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445781Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rainer Winkler, Matthias Söllner, and Jan Marco Leimeister. 2021. Enhancing problem-solving skills with smart personal assistant technology. Computers & Education 165 (May 2021), 104148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104148Google ScholarCross Ref
- Philip H. Winne and Roger Azevedo. 2014. Metacognition. In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US, 63--87. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.006Google ScholarCross Ref
- B.L. William Wong. 2003. Critical Decision Method data analysis. The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction, 327--346.Google Scholar
- Anbang Xu, Shih-Wen Huang, and Brian Bailey. 2014. Voyant: generating structured feedback on visual designs using a crowd of non-experts. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, Baltimore Maryland USA, 1433--1444. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531604Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haoqi Zhang, Matthew W. Easterday, Elizabeth M. Gerber, Daniel Rees Lewis, and Leesha Maliakal. 2017. Agile Research Studios: Orchestrating Communities of Practice to Advance Research Training. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 220--232. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998199Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haiyi Zhu, Robert Kraut, and Aniket Kittur. 2012. Effectiveness of shared leadership in online communities. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 407--416. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145269Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haiyi Zhu, Robert E. Kraut, Yi-Chia Wang, and Aniket Kittur. 2011. Identifying shared leadership in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3431--3434. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979453Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Intelligent Coaching Systems: Understanding One-to-many Coaching for Ill-defined Problem Solving
Recommendations
Coaching Older Adults: Persuasive and Multimodal Approaches to Coaching for Daily Living
ICMI '20 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal InteractionIn this work, we present our approach to designing a multimodal, persuasive system for coaching older adults in four domains of daily living: activity, mobility, sleep, social interaction. Our design choices were informed by considerations related to ...
Tailoring coaching strategies to users’ motivation in a multi-agent health coaching application
AbstractEmbodied conversational agents are often included in health behaviour change applications as intelligent virtual coaches. A major challenge in their development is tailoring coaching dialogues to user profiles. Agents should collect ...
Highlights- Tailoring of coaching strategies is explored in a multi-agent application.
- ...
Novice - Expert Pair Coaching: Teaching Python in a Pandemic
SIGCSE '21: Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationNovice-Expert Pair Coaching (NEPC) is an approach to synchronously teach programming online. A computer programming educator (the expert) and an individual without prior programming experience (the novice) team up while students observe as the novice ...
Comments