skip to main content
10.1145/3580219.3580231acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescceaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Graph-Enhanced Question Generation with Question Type Prediction and Statement Recovery

Published:02 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Abstract—Question Generation (QG) is an essential task in natural language processing, which aims to generate grammatical questions for given sentences or paragraphs. This task focuses on understanding the structures and semantics of sentences. This paper proposes a graph-enhanced question generation model based on Variational Autoencoders (VAE). We construct a semantic graph by dependency parsing and then encode the graph by iteration of Gated Graph Neural Networks (GGNN). Then we get the graph-enhanced representation by fusing the sentence-level and graph-level representation to perform pre-training of statement recovery and joint training of question type prediction and generation. Experiments show promising results of our proposed model on the most extensively used Question Answering (QA) dataset SQuAD.

References

  1. Nan Duan, Duyu Tang, Peng Chen, and Ming Zhou. 2017. Question Generation for Question Answering. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 866–874.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jingjing Xu, Yuechen Wang, Duyu Tang, Nan Duan, Pengcheng Yang, Qi Zeng, Ming Zhou, and Xu Sun. 2019. Asking clarification questions in knowledgebased question answering. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 1618–1629.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Michael Heilman and Noah A. Smith. 2010. Good question! statistical ranking for question generation. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 609–617.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Nasrin Mostafazadeh, Ishan Misra, Jacob Devlin, Margaret Mitchell, Xiaodong He, and Lucy Vanderwende. 2016. Generating natural questions about an image. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1802–1813.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. David Lindberg, Fred Popowich, John Nesbit, and PhilWinne. 2013. Generating natural language questions to support learning on-line. In Proceedings of the 14th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 105–114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Xinya Du, Junru Shao, and Claire Cardie. 2017. Learning to ask: Neural question generation for reading comprehension. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 1342–1352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Qingyu Zhou, Nan Yang, Furu Wei, Chuanqi Tan, Hangbo Bao, and Ming Zhou. 2017. Neural question generation from text: A preliminary study. In CCF International Conference of Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing (NLPCC), pages 662–671.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jingjing Li, Yifan Gao, Lidong Bing, Irwin King, and Michael R. Lyu. 2019. Improving question generation with to the point context. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 3216–3226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Valentina Pyatkin, Paul Roit, Julian Michael, Yoav Goldberg, Reut Tsarfaty, and Ido Dagan. 2021. Asking it all: Generating contextualized questions for any semantic role. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1429–1441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Yanghoon Kim, Hwanhee Lee, Joongbo Shin, and Kyomin Jung. 2019. Improving neural question generation using answer separation. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 6602–6609.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Xin Jia, Wenjie Zhou, Xu Sun, and Yunfang Wu. 2020. How to Ask Good Questions? Try to Leverage Paraphrases. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 6130–6140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Diederik P. Kingma and Max Welling. 2014. Autoencoding variational bayes. In 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Yujia Li, Daniel Tarlow, Marc Brockschmidt, and Richard S. Zemel. 2016. Gated graph sequence neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. 2016. SQuAD: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2383–2392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Xingdi Yuan, Tong Wang, Caglar Gulcehre, Alessandro Sordoni, Philip Bachman, Sandeep Subramanian, Saizheng Zhang, and Adam Trischler. 2017. Machine Comprehension by Text-to-Text Neural Question Generation. ArXiv preprint arXiv:1705.02012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Bang Liu, Mingjun Zhao, Di Niu, Kunfeng Lai, Yancheng He, Haojie Wei, and Yu Xu. 2019. Learning to Generate Questions by Learning What not to Generate. In The World Wide Web Conference, pages 1106–1118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. 2017. Semi-supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yu Chen, Lingfei Wu, and Mohammed J. Zaki. 2020. Reinforcement learning based graph-to-sequence model for natural question generation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Xiyao Ma, Qile Zhu, Y. Zhou, Xiaolin Li, and Dapeng Wu. 2020. Asking complex questions with multi-hop answerfocused reasoning. ArXiv preprint arXiv:2009.07402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Weichao Wang, Shi Feng, Daling Wang, and Yifei Zhang. 2019. Answer-guided and Semantic Coherent Question Generation in Open-domain Conversation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 5066–5076.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Dong Bok Lee, Seanie Lee, Woo Tae Jeong, Donghwan Kim, and Sung Ju Hwang. 2020. Generating Diverse and Consistent QA pairs from Contexts with Information-Maximizing Hierarchical Conditional VAEs. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 208–224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Lei Shen, Fandong Meng, Jinchao Zhang, Yang Feng, and Jie Zhou. 2021. GTM: A Generative Triple-wise Model for Conversational Question Generation. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3495–3506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Wenjie Zhou, Minghua Zhang, and Yunfang Wu. 2019. Multi-Task Learning with Language Modeling for Question Generation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 3394–3399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Xiyao Ma, Qile Zhu, Yanlin Zhou, Xiaolin Li, and Dapeng Wu. 2020. Improving Question Generation with Sentence-level Semantic Matching and Answer Position Inferring. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Sudha Rao, Michel Galley, and Julian McAuley. 2021. Ask what's missing and what's useful: Improving Clarification Question Generation using Global Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 4300–4312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Kyunghyun Cho, Bart van Merriënboer, Caglar Gulcehre, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Fethi Bougares, Holger Schwenk, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 1724–1734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Diederik P. Kingma and Max Welling. 2014. Auto-encoding variational bayes. In 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Chris J. Maddison, Andriy Mnih, and Yee Whye Teh. 2017. The concrete distribution: A continuous relaxation of discrete random variables. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Eric Jang, Shixiang Gu, and Ben Poole. 2017. Categorical reparameterization with gumbel-softmax. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Yao Zhao, Xiaochuan Ni, Yuanyuan Ding, and Qifa Ke. 2018. Paragraph-level Neural Question Generation with Maxout Pointer and Gated Self-attention Networks. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 3901–3910.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Dorottya Demszky, Kelvin Guu, and Percy Liang. 2018. Transforming question answering datasets into natural language inference datasets. ArXiv preprint arXiv:1809.02922.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 311–318.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Alon Lavie and Abhaya Agarwal. 2007. METEOR: An Automatic Metric for MT Evaluation with High Levels of Correlation with Human Judgments. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 228–231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Chin-Yew Lin. 2004. ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text Summarization Branches Out: Proceedings of the ACL-04 Workshop, pages 74–81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Matt Gardner, Joel Grus, Mark Neumann, Oyvind Tafjord, Pradeep Dasigi, Nelson F. Liu, Matthew Peters, Michael Schmitz, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2018. AllenNLP: A Deep Semantic Natural Language Processing Platform. In Proceedings of Workshop for NLP Open Source Software (NLP-OSS), pages 1–6, Melbourne, Australia. Association for Computational Linguistics.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Graph-Enhanced Question Generation with Question Type Prediction and Statement Recovery
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CCEAI '23: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Control Engineering and Artificial Intelligence
          January 2023
          187 pages
          ISBN:9781450397513
          DOI:10.1145/3580219

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 March 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)39
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format