skip to main content
10.1145/3580305.3599341acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Fairness-Aware Continuous Predictions of Multiple Analytics Targets in Dynamic Networks

Published:04 August 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

We study a novel problem of continuously predicting a number of user-subscribed continuous analytics targets (CATs) in dynamic networks. Our architecture includes any dynamic graph neural network model as the back end applied over the network data, and per CAT front end models that return results with their confidence to users. We devise a data filtering algorithm that feeds a provably optimal subset of data in the embedding space from back end model to front end models. Secondly, to ensure fairness in terms of query result accuracy for different CATs and users, we propose a fairness metric and a fairness-aware training scheduling algorithm, along with accuracy guarantees on fairness estimation. Our experiments over five real-world datasets show that our proposed solution is effective, efficient, fair, extensible, and adaptive.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

rtfp0581-2min-promo.mp4

mp4

2.6 MB

References

  1. J. Ahmed and M. Ahmed. 2018. Semantic web approach of integrating big data -- A review. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. N. Alon and J. Spencer. 1992. The Probabilistic Method. New York: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brian Babcock, Shivnath Babu, Mayur Datar, Rajeev Motwani, and Jennifer Widom. 2002. Models and Issues in Data Stream Systems. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS '02). 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Shivnath Babu and Jennifer Widom. 2001. Continuous queries over data streams. ACM SIGMOD Record, Vol. 30, 3 (2001), 109--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Antoine Bordes, Nicolas Usunier, Alberto Garcia-Duran, Jason Weston, and Oksana Yakhnenko. 2013. Translating Embeddings for Modeling Multi-relational Data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26. Curran Associates, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Elizabeth Boschee, Jennifer Lautenschlager, Sean O'Brien, Steve Shellman, James Starz, and Michael Ward. 2015. ICEWS coded event data. Harvard Dataverse, Vol. 12 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Michael M. Bronstein, Joan Bruna, Taco Cohen, and Petar Veličković. 2021. Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs Geodesics and Gauges. arXiv:2104.13478 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. N Cesa-Bianchi and G Lugosi. 2006. Prediction, learning, and games. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. K Crammer, O Dekel, J Keshet, S Shalev-Shwartz, and Y Singer. 2006. Online passive-aggressive algorithms. JMLR (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Michael Crawshaw. 2020. Multi-Task Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.09796 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Devdatt P. Dubhashi and Alessandro Panconesi. 2009. Concentration of Measure for the Analysis of Randomized Algorithms. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardty, Toniann Pitassiz, Omer Reingold, and Richard Zemel. 2012. Fairness Through Awareness. In The 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. R. S. Evans. 2016. Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future. IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics, Vol. Suppl 1 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Chuan Guo, Geoff Pleiss, Yu Sun, and Kilian Q. Weinberger. 2017. On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S.C.H. Hoi, J Wang, and P Zhao. 2014. Libol: A library for online learning algorithms. Journal of Machine (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. C. H. Hoi, D. Sahoo, J. Lu, and P. Zhao. 2018. Online learning: A comprehensive survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.02871 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Woojeong Jin, Meng Qu, Xisen Jin, and Xiang Ren. 2020. Recurrent Event Network: Autoregressive Structure Inference over Temporal Knowledge Graphs. In EMNLP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. AEW Johnson, TJ Pollard, L Shen, L Lehman, M Feng, M Ghassemi, B Moody, P Szolovits, LA Celi, and RG Mark. 2016. MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database. Scientific Data (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Justin M. Johnson and Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar. 2019. Survey on deep learning with class imbalance. Journal of Big Data, Vol. 6, 27 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. M. Seyed Kazemi. 2022. Dynamic Graph Neural Networks. In Graph Neural Networks: Foundations, Frontiers, and Applications, Lingfei Wu, Peng Cui, Jian Pei, and Liang Zhao (Eds.). Springer Singapore, Singapore, 323--349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. 2016. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 5, 1 (2016), 61--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Julien Leblay and Melisachew Wudage Chekol. 2018. Deriving validity time in knowledge graph. In The Web Conference.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J Lee, J Yun, S Hwang, and E Yang. 2017. Lifelong learning with dynamically expandable networks. arXiv:1708.01547 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalev Leetaru and Philip A Schrodt. 2013. GDELT: Global data on events, location, and tone, 1979--2012. ISA annual convention, Vol. 2 (2013), 1--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Tsung-Yi Lin, Priya Goyal, Ross Girshick, Kaiming He, and Piotr Dollar. 2017. Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection. In ICCV.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Xuanming Liu and Tingjian Ge. 2020. Mining Dynamic Graph Streams for Predictive Queries Under Resource Constraints. In PAKDD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Andrew McGregor. 2014. Graph stream algorithms: A survey. ACM SIGMOD Record, Vol. 43, 1 (2014), 9--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ninareh Mehrabi, Fred Morstatter, Nripsuta Saxena, Kristina Lerman, and Aram Galstyan. 2022. A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning. Comput. Surveys, Vol. 54, 6 (2022), 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. S.P. Meyn and R.L. Tweedie. 2012. Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability. Springer London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. M. Mitzenmacher and E.Upfal. 2005. Probability and Computing: Randomized Algorithms and Probabilistic Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Jooyoung Moon, Jihyo Kim, Younghak Shin, and Sangheum Hwang. 2020. Confidence-Aware Learning for Deep Neural Networks. In ICML.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Faisal Mushtaq and Matt E. Moore. 2020. Cloud-based interoperability will accelerate clinical outcomes. Physicians Practice (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Aldo Pareja, Giacomo Domeniconi, Jie Chen, Tengfei Ma, Toyotaro Suzumura, Hiroki Kanezashi, Tim Kaler, Tao B. Schardl, and Charles E. Leiserson. 2020. EvolveGCN: Evolving Graph Convolutional Networks for Dynamic Graphs. In AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. German I. Parisi, Ronald Kemker, Jose L. Part, Christopher Kanan, and Stefan Wermter. 2019. Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: A review. Neural Networks, Vol. 113 (2019), 54--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Frank Rosenblatt. 1958. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological review, Vol. 65, 6 (1958).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Tara Safavi, Danai Koutra, and Edgar Meij. 2020. Evaluating the Calibration of Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Trustworthy Link Prediction. In The 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. D Sahoo, S. C. H. Hoi, and P Zhao. 2016. Cost sensitive online multiple kernel classification. ACML (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Doyen Sahoo, Quang Pham, Jing Lu, and Steven C. H. Hoi. 2018. Online Deep Learning: Learning Deep Neural Networks on the Fly. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-18. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2660--2666.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. J. Skarding, B. Gabrys, and K. Musial. 2021. Foundations and modelling of dynamic networks using Dynamic Graph Neural Networks: A survey. IEEE Acces, Vol. 9 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Naisha Sultana1, Gandikota Ramu, and B. Eswara Reddy. 2014. Cloud-based Development of Smart and Connected Data in Healthcare Application. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, Vol. 5, 6 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Pedro Tabacof and Luca Costabello. 2020. Probability Calibration for Knowledge Graph Embedding Models. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. V. A. Traag, L. Waltman, and N. J. van Eck. 2019. From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Scientific Reports, Vol. 9, 5233 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Rakshit Trivedi, Hanjun Dai, Yichen Wang, and Le Song. 2017. Know-evolve: Deep temporal reasoning for dynamic knowledge graphs. In ICML.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Petar Velickovic, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Lio, and Yoshua Bengio. 2018. Graph Attention Networks. ICLR (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Junshan Wang, Guojie Song, Yi Wu, and Liang Wang. 2020. Streaming Graph Neural Networks via Continual Learning. In CIKM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Rex Ying, Zhaoyu Lou, Jiaxuan You, Chengtao Wen, Arquimedes Canedo, and Jure Leskovec. 2020. Neural Subgraph Matching. In CoRR abs/2007.03092.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Ling Zhao, Yujiao Song, Chao Zhang, Yu Liu, Pu Wang, Tao Lin, Min Deng, and Haifeng Li. 2020. T-GCN: A Temporal Graph Convolutional Network for Traffic Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 21, 9 (2020), 3848--3858.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Peixiang Zhao, Charu Aggarwal, and Gewen He. 2016. Link Prediction in Graph Streams. In ICDE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. G Zhou, K Sohn, and H Lee. 2012. Online incremental feature learning with denoising autoencoders. AISTATS (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. M Zinkevich. 2003. Online convex programming and generalized infinitesimal gradient ascent. In ICML.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Fairness-Aware Continuous Predictions of Multiple Analytics Targets in Dynamic Networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        KDD '23: Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
        August 2023
        5996 pages
        ISBN:9798400701030
        DOI:10.1145/3580305

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 August 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)172
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader