skip to main content
10.1145/3580305.3599403acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Learning-Based Ad Auction Design with Externalities: The Framework and A Matching-Based Approach

Published:04 August 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Learning-based ad auctions have increasingly been adopted in online advertising. However, existing approaches neglect externalities, such as the interaction between ads and organic items. In this paper, we propose a general framework, namely Score-Weighted VCG, for designing learning-based ad auctions that account for externalities. The framework decomposes the optimal auction design into two parts: designing a monotone score function and an allocation algorithm, which facilitates data-driven implementation. Theoretical results demonstrate that this framework produces the optimal incentive-compatible and individually rational ad auction under various externality-aware CTR models while being data-efficient and robust. Moreover, we present an approach to implement the proposed framework with a matching-based allocation algorithm. Experiment results on both real-world and synthetic data illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

ID1358-2min-promo.mp4

mp4

27.6 MB

References

  1. Yang Cai, Constantinos Daskalakis, and S. Matthew Weinberg. 2012. Optimal Multi-dimensional Mechanism Design: Reducing Revenue to Welfare Maximization. 2012 IEEE 53rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (2012), 130--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ruggiero Cavallo, Maxim Sviridenko, and Christopher A. Wilkens. 2018. Matching Auctions for Search and Native Ads. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chi Chen, Hui Chen, Kangzhi Zhao, Junsheng Zhou, Li He, Hongbo Deng, Jian Xu, Bo Zheng, Yong Zhang, and Chunxiao Xing. 2022. EXTR: Click-Through Rate Prediction with Externalities in E-Commerce Sponsored Search. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2732--2740.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Michael J Curry, Uro Lyi, Tom Goldstein, and John P Dickerson. 2022. Learning revenue-maximizing auctions with differentiable matching. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR, 6062--6073.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Xiaotie Deng, Yang Sun, Ming Yin, and Yunhong Zhou. 2010. Mechanism design for multi-slot ads auction in sponsored search markets. In Frontiers in Algorithmics: 4th International Workshop, FAW 2010, Wuhan, China, August 11-13, 2010. Proceedings 4. Springer, 11--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Zhijian Duan, Haoran Sun, Yurong Chen, and Xiaotie Deng. 2023. A Scalable Neural Network for DSIC Affine Maximizer Auction Design. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12162 (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhijian Duan, Jingwu Tang, Yutong Yin, Zhe Feng, Xiang Yan, Manzil Zaheer, and Xiaotie Deng. 2022. A context-integrated transformer-based neural network for auction design. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 5609--5626.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Paul Dütting, Zhe Feng, Harikrishna Narasimhan, David Parkes, and Sai Srivatsa Ravindranath. 2019. Optimal auctions through deep learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 1706--1715.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Benjamin Edelman, Michael Ostrovsky, and Michael Schwarz. 2007. Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. American economic review, Vol. 97, 1 (2007), 242--259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Nicola Gatti, Alessandro Lazaric, and Francesco Trovò. 2012. A truthful learning mechanism for contextual multi-slot sponsored search auctions with externalities. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 605--622.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Shivam Gupta. 2016. On a modification of the VCG mechanism and its optimality. Oper. Res. Lett., Vol. 44 (2016), 415--418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dmitry Ivanov, Iskander Safiulin, Igor Filippov, and Ksenia Balabaeva. 2022. Optimal-er Auctions through Attention. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Bernard J Jansen and Tracy Mullen. 2008. Sponsored search: an overview of the concept, history, and technology. International Journal of Electronic Business, Vol. 6, 2 (2008), 114--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Przemyslaw Jeziorski and Ilya Segal. 2015. What makes them click: Empirical analysis of consumer demand for search advertising. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, Vol. 7, 3 (2015), 24--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J. Kiefer. 1957. Optimum Sequential Search and Approximation Methods Under Minimum Regularity Assumptions. Journal of The Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 5 (1957), 105--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Roger W. Koenker and Gilbert W. Jr. Bassett. 2007. Regression Quantiles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Harold W. Kuhn. 1955. The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), Vol. 52 (1955).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Guogang Liao, Xuejian Li, Ze Wang, Fan Yang, Muzhi Guan, Bingqi Zhu, Yongkang Wang, Xingxing Wang, and Dong Wang. 2022. NMA: Neural Multi-slot Auctions with Externalities for Online Advertising. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.10018 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Xiangyu Liu, Chuan Yu, Zhilin Zhang, Zhenzhe Zheng, Yu Rong, Hongtao Lv, Da Huo, Yiqing Wang, Dagui Chen, Jian Xu, et al. 2021. Neural auction: End-to-end learning of auction mechanisms for e-commerce advertising. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 3354--3364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Roger B Myerson. 1981. Optimal auction design. Mathematics of operations research, Vol. 6, 1 (1981), 58--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jad Rahme, Samy Jelassi, and S. Matthew Weinberg. 2021. Auction Learning as a Two-Player Game. In International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Tuomas Sandholm and Anton Likhodedov. 2015. Automated design of revenue-maximizing combinatorial auctions. Operations Research, Vol. 63, 5 (2015), 1000--1025.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Shai Shalev-Shwartz and Shai Ben-David. 2014. Understanding machine learning: From theory to algorithms. Cambridge university press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Weiping Song, Chence Shi, Zhiping Xiao, Zhijian Duan, Yewen Xu, Ming Zhang, and Jian Tang. 2019. Autoint: Automatic feature interaction learning via self-attentive neural networks. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 1161--1170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Zhulin Tao, Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Xianglin Huang, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2020. HoAFM: a high-order attentive factorization machine for CTR prediction. Information Processing & Management, Vol. 57, 6 (2020), 102076.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Yiqing Wang, Junqi Jin, Zhenzhe Zheng, Haiyang Xu, Fan Wu, Yuning Jiang, and Guihai Chen. 2021. Multi-objective Dynamic Auction Mechanism for Online Advertising. In 2021 IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference (IPCCC). IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Yiqing Wang, Xiangyu Liu, Zhenzhe Zheng, Zhilin Zhang, Miao Xu, Chuan Yu, and Fan Wu. 2022. On Designing a Two-stage Auction for Online Advertising. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022. 90--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Chao Wen, Miao Xu, Zhilin Zhang, Zhenzhe Zheng, Yuhui Wang, Xiangyu Liu, Yu Rong, Dong Xie, Xiaoyang Tan, Chuan Yu, et al. 2022. A Cooperative-Competitive Multi-Agent Framework for Auto-bidding in Online Advertising. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 1129--1139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Zhilin Zhang, Xiangyu Liu, Zhenzhe Zheng, Chenrui Zhang, Miao Xu, Junwei Pan, Chuan Yu, Fan Wu, Jian Xu, and Kun Gai. 2021. Optimizing Multiple Performance Metrics with Deep GSP Auctions for E-commerce Advertising. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 993--1001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Learning-Based Ad Auction Design with Externalities: The Framework and A Matching-Based Approach

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        KDD '23: Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
        August 2023
        5996 pages
        ISBN:9798400701030
        DOI:10.1145/3580305

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 August 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)445
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)65

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Access Granted

      The conference sponsors are committed to making content openly accessible in a timely manner.
      This article is provided by ACM and the conference, through the ACM OpenTOC service.