ABSTRACT
This paper uses novel sensor data to study drivers' risky phone use behavior. The results challenge the conventional wisdom of moral hazard in insurance. We first identify handheld phone use behavior ("HPU") and quantify its causal impact on accident likelihood ("riskiness") using exhaustive fixed-effect models. We then find HPU to be risky but insensitive to both insurance coverage changes and weather shocks that increase its riskiness. This contradicts the prevailing theoretical prediction and empirical studies that have thus far relied on claims data alone. On the other hand, an experiment with a one-time text-message warning led to a persistent 15% HPU reduction. Drivers' inattention to risk thus limits moral hazard.
Index Terms
- Re-examining Moral Hazard under Inattention: New Evidence from Behavioral Data in Auto Insurance
Recommendations
Detection of driver inattention from fluctuations in vehicle operating data
Drivers have to drive their vehicle safely by properly using steering, throttling, and braking controls. However, drivers do not always maintain their concentration on managing their vehicles. The primary causes of driver inattention are distracting ...
Latent Hazard Notification for Highly Automated Driving: Expected Safety Benefits and Driver Behavioral Adaptation
Although latent hazard notification for highly automated driving is expected to enhance traffic safety, its practical effects have yet to be verified. This study systemically investigated the expected safety benefits and driver behavioral adaptation based ...
A Data Mining Approach for Risk Assessment in Car Insurance: Evidence from Montenegro
This paper has proposed a data mining approach for risk assessment in car insurance. Standard methods imply classification of policies to great number of tariff classes and assessment of risk on basis of them. With application of data mining techniques, ...
Comments