skip to main content
10.1145/3581807.3581812acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Nutrient Deficiency Diagnosis of Plants Based on Transfer Learning and Lightweight Convolutional Neural Networks MobileNetV3-Large

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Nutrient Deficiency Diagnosis of Plants is an important application in precision agriculture. At present, nutrient deficiency diagnosis of plants mainly depends on manual identification, which makes it difficult to ensure efficiency and accuracy. Therefore, based on deep learning and focusing on the problems of difficult convergence and poor real-time performance of the existing deep convolution neural network in the detection of plant nutrient deficiency, this study proposes a lightweight model—UMNet (Nutrient-MobileNetV3-Network) for plant nutrient deficiency detection. This model enhances the collected rice leaf images to expand the dataset, then migrates the knowledge learned by the MobilenetV3-Large network on the ImageNet dataset to UMNet, redesigns a new full connection layer, and uses a new activation function. The experimental results show that: (1) Transfer learning solves the problem of insufficient training data. Compared with learning without transfer learning, the accuracy increases by 7.22% ∼ 9.63%, which greatly improves the convergence speed and recognition accuracy of the model. (2) Compared with complex convolutional neural networks(CNN), such as InceptionV3, InceptionResnetV2 and VGG16, the lightweight network UMNet has lower storage requirements and shorter training time. At the same time, it can still ensure high accuracy, and the recognition accuracy is better than other lightweight networks with the same complexity: ShuffleNetV2, EfficientNetB0 and Xception. The identification accuracy of the plant nutrient deficiency detection model UMNet constructed in this paper can reach 97.80%, and the training time of a single epoch is about 46.4s. It only takes 1.45s to predict the nutrient deficiency of a single object, which realizes the intelligent detection in the field of plant nutrient deficiency, and it will promote academic exploration of deep learning in plant phenotype research.

References

  1. Ngugi L C, Abelwahab M, Abo-Zahhad M. 2021. Recent advances in image processing techniques for automated leaf pest and disease recognition–A review. Information processing in agriculture, 8(1): 27-51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Molotoks A, Smith P, Dawson T P. 2021. Impacts of land use, population, and climate change on global food security. Food and Energy Security, 10(1): e261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Xiong J, Yu D, Liu S, 2021. A review of plant phenotypic image recognition technology based on deep learning. Electronics, 10(1): 81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kalaji H M, Bąba W, Gediga K, 2018. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool for nutrient status identification in rapeseed plants. Photosynthesis Research, 136(3): 329-343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hongyu L, Hanping M, Wenjing Z, 2015. Rapid diagnosis of tomato NPK nutrition level based on hyperspectral technology. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Latte M V, Shidnal S, Anami B S. 2017. Rule based approach to determine nutrient deficiency in paddy leaf images. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 13(2): 227-245.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Xu G, Zhang F, Shah S G, 2011. Use of leaf color images to identify nitrogen and potassium deficient tomatoes. Pattern Recognition Letters, 32(11): 1584-1590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Sari Y, Maulida M, Maulana R, 2021. Detection of Corn Leaves Nutrient Deficiency Using Support Vector Machine (SVM). 2021 4th International Conference of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE). IEEE, 396-400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Merchant M, Paradkar V, Khanna M, 2018. Mango leaf deficiency detection using digital image processing and machine learning. 2018 3rd International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT). IEEE, 1-3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Chlingaryan A, Sukkarieh S, Whelan B. 2018. Machine learning approaches for crop yield prediction and nitrogen status estimation in precision agriculture: A review. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 151: 61-69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Han K A M, Watchareeruetai U. 2019. Classification of nutrient deficiency in black gram using deep convolutional neural networks. 2019 16th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE). IEEE, 277-282.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Howard A G, Zhu M, Chen B, 2017. Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sandler M, Howard A, Zhu M, 2018. Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 4510-4520.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Howard A, Sandler M, Chu G, 2019. Searching for mobilenetv3. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. 1314-1324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Elsken T, Metzen J H, Hutter F. 2019. Neural architecture search: A survey. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 20(1): 1997-2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hu J, Shen L, Sun G. 2018. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 7132-7141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Weiss K, Khoshgoftaar T M, Wang D D. 2016. A survey of transfer learning. Journal of Big data, 3(1): 1-40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Tajbakhsh N, Shin J Y, Gurudu S R, 2016. Convolutional neural networks for medical image analysis: Full training or fine tuning?. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 35(5): 1299-1312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, 2009. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Ieee, 248-255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Bottou L. 2012. Stochastic gradient descent tricks. Neural networks: Tricks of the trade. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 421-436.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 770-778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Szegedy C, Vanhoucke V, Ioffe S, 2016. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2818-2826.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Szegedy C, Ioffe S, Vanhoucke V, 2017. Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. Thirty-first AAAI conference on artificial intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Simonyan K, Zisserman A. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition(ILSVRC)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Tan M, Le Q. 2019. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 6105-6114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Chollet F. 2017. Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1251-1258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Ma N, Zhang X, Zheng H T, 2018. Shufflenet v2: Practical guidelines for efficient cnn architecture design. Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV). 116-131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Nutrient Deficiency Diagnosis of Plants Based on Transfer Learning and Lightweight Convolutional Neural Networks MobileNetV3-Large

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCPR '22: Proceedings of the 2022 11th International Conference on Computing and Pattern Recognition
      November 2022
      683 pages
      ISBN:9781450397056
      DOI:10.1145/3581807

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 May 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)35
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format