skip to main content
10.1145/3582580.3582621acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicetmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Development of Cultural Design Guidelines for Mobile Learning Applications for Creative Industry Communities

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

A minimal study bridges mobile learning with creative industries, particularly for its usability. The cultural factors in mobile apps for creative industries can be embedded in future learning technologies development. Therefore, this study investigates the current need for cultural design elements in developing mobile learning applications for the creative industry community. Achieving a good usability level for mobile learning applications is vital in equipping the community with digital literacy. The lack of cultural design elements informs in development of design guidelines for mobile apps for creative industries. This study uses the Fuzzy Delphi Method to examine the expert agreement on the need for cultural design elements in developing design guidelines. The results show that cultural design elements guidelines are needed in developing mobile learning applications. The elements identified for the design guidelines are Suitable Content for Local Culture, Language Usage, and The Local Philosophy Has Local Culture Value.

References

  1. Abdullah, N., and N. F. A. Hamid. 2019. “Interface Design Features of Mobile Application for Senior Citizens.” Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci 14(1):436–42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler, Michael, and Erio Ziglio. 1996. Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and Its Application to Social Policy and Public Health. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad, Kham Sila, Jocelyn Armarego, and Fay Sudweeks. 2013. “Literature Review on the Feasibility of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) in Developing Vocabulary Skills among Non-English Speaking Migrant and Refugee Women.” Pp. 336–41 in 2013 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Almaiah, Mohammed Amin. 2018. “Acceptance and Usage of a Mobile Information System Services in University of Jordan.” Education and Information Technologies 23(5):1873–95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Almaiah, Mohammed Amin, Sarra Ayouni, Fahima Hajjej, Abdalwali Lutfi, Omar Almomani, and Ali Bani Awad. 2022. “Smart Mobile Learning Success Model for Higher Educational Institutions in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Electronics 11(8):1278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Alshurideh, Muhammad, Barween al Kurdi, Said A. Salloum, Ibrahim Arpaci, and Mostafa Al-Emran. 2020. “Predicting the Actual Use of M-Learning Systems: A Comparative Approach Using PLS-SEM and Machine Learning Algorithms.” Interactive Learning Environments 1–15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Alsswey, Ahmed, and Hosam Al-Samarraie. 2021. “The Role of Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions in the Design of User Interface: The Case of Arabic.” AI EDAM 35(1):116–27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Althunibat, Ahmad, Mohammed Amin Almaiah, and Feras Altarawneh. 2021. “Examining the Factors Influencing the Mobile Learning Applications Usage in Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Electronics 10(21):2676.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Alwahaibi, Yahya Ahmed, Shamsul Arrieya Ariffin, Salem Garfan, Aslina binti Saad, and Ramalingam Dharmalingam. 2021. “Proposing an M-Government Framework for the Ministry of Housing in Oman: For Efficient Digital Literacy and Services.” International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL) 13(4):21–44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ariffin, Shamsul Arrieya, Azniah Ismail, Maizatul Hayati Yatim, and Salman Firdaus Sidek. 2018. “An Assessment of Culturally Appropriate Design: A Malaysian University Context.” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies 12(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Beram, Sukor, Marinah Awang, Ramlee Ismail, and Norzalina Noor. 2021. “Application of the Fuzzy Delphi Method to Organisational Leadership Competencies for Educational Middle Leaders.” Management Research Journal 10:82–93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Berita Harian. 2021. “Permintaan Luar Biasa Gajet Di Shopee Semasa PKP 2.0.” Retrieved August 30, 2022 (https://www.bharian.com.my/bisnes/teknologi/2021/01/780070/permintaan-luar-biasa-gajet-di-shopee-semasa-pkp-20).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. BuildFire. 2021. “What Is Mobile Marketing? (The Best Answer Ever!) - BuildFire.” Retrieved August 28, 2022 (https://buildfire.com/what-is-mobile-marketing/).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Buller, David B, Marianne Berwick, Kathy Lantz, Mary Klein Buller, James Shane, Ilima Kane, Xia Liu, D B Buller, and M. K. Buller. 2015. “Smartphone Mobile Application Delivering Personalized, Real-Time Sun Protection Advice A Randomized Clinical Trial.” JAMA Dermatol 151(5):497–504. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.3889.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Cantrill, J. A., Buetow Sibbald, and S. Buetow. 1996. “The Delphi and Nominal Group Techniques in Health Services Research.” International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 4(2):67–74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Chang, Pao-Long, Chiung-Wen Hsu, and Po-Chien Chang. 2011. “Fuzzy Delphi Method for Evaluating Hydrogen Production Technologies.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 36(21):14172–79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Chao, Cheng-Min. 2019. “Factors Determining the Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Learning: An Application and Extension of the UTAUT Model.” Frontiers in Psychology 10:1652.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Cheng, Ching-Hsue, and Yin Lin. 2002a. “Evaluating the Best Main Battle Tank Using Fuzzy Decision Theory with Linguistic Criteria Evaluation.” European Journal of Operational Research 142(1):174–86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Cheng, Ching-Hsue, and Yin Lin. 2002b. “Evaluating the Best Main Battle Tank Using Fuzzy Decision Theory with Linguistic Criteria Evaluation.” European Journal of Operational Research 142(1):174–86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Chu, Hui-Chun, and Gwo-Jen Hwang. 2008. “A Delphi-Based Approach to Developing Expert Systems with the Cooperation of Multiple Experts.” Expert Systems with Applications 34(4):2826–40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Criollo-C, Santiago, Andrea Guerrero-Arias, Ángel Jaramillo-Alcázar, and Sergio Luján-Mora. 2021. “Mobile Learning Technologies for Education: Benefits and Pending Issues.” Applied Sciences 11(9):4111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. DIKN. 2010. “Dasar Industri Kreatif Negara.” Kementerian Penerangan Komunikasi & Kebudayaan. Retrieved March 25, 2022 (https://www.kkmm.gov.my/pdf/Dasar/dikn.pdf).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ebnali, Mahdi, Mousgan Shah, and Adel Mazloumi. 2019. “How MHealth Apps with Higher Usability Effects on Patients with Breast Cancer?”Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Hasson, Felicity, Sinead Keeney, and Hugh McKenna. 2000. “Research Guidelines for the Delphi Survey Technique.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 32(4):1008–15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. ISO. 2018. “ISO - ISO 9241-11:2018 - Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and Concepts.” Retrieved January 10, 2022 (https://www.iso.org/standard/63500.html).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jamil, Mohd Ridhuan Mohd, Zaharah Hussin, Nurul Rabihah Mat Noh, Ahmad Arifin Sapar, and Norlidah Alias. 2013. “Application of Fuzzy Delphi Method in Educational Research.” Saedah Siraj, Norlidah Alias, DeWitt, D. & Zaharah Hussin (Eds.), Design and Developmental Research 85–92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones 1911-, Harry. 1978. Forecasting Technology for Planning Decisions / Harry Jones and Brian C. Twiss. edited by B. C. Twiss 1926-. London: Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Manurung, Rosida Tiurma. 2021. “Digital Literacy Based on Local Wisdom in Language Learning.” Pp. 163–68 in Proceeding.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Marican, Sabita. 2005. “Kaedah Penyelidikan Sains Sosial, Petaling Jaya, Selangor.”Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Mohd Jamil, Mohd Ridhuan’, and Nurulrabihah’ Mat Noh. 2021. Kepelbagaian Metodologi Dalam Penyelidikan Reka Bentuk Dan Pembangunan. Cetakan Ketiga. edited by I. Noh. Qaisar Prestige Resources.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Mustapha, Ramlan, and Ghazali Darussalam. 2018. Aplikasi Kaedah Fuzzy Delphi Dalam Penyelidikan Sains Sosial. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Mustapha, Ramlan, Zaharah Hussin, and Saedah Siraj. 2017a. “Analisis Faktor Penyebab Ketidakjujuran Akademik Dalam Kalangan Mahasiswa: Aplikasi Teknik Fuzzy Delphi.” JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik 5(2):1–18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Mustapha, Ramlan, Zaharah Hussin, and Saedah Siraj. 2017b. “Analisis Faktor Penyebab Ketidakjujuran Akademik Dalam Kalangan Mahasiswa: Aplikasi Teknik Fuzzy Delphi.” JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik 5(2):1–18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Mustapha, Ramlan, Nurshahira Ibrahim, Maziah Mahmud, Norma Aisyah, Nur Hapizah Borhan Malkan, Asjad Mohamad, and Nur Hidayah Mohamad. 2022. “The Impact on Hoax News among Societies: What Islamic Expert Say?” Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development 11(1):186–98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Nielsen, Jakob. 2020. “10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design.” Retrieved March 28, 2022 (https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Nieuważny, Jagna, Fumito Masui, Michal Ptaszynski, Rafal Rzepka, and Karol Nowakowski. 2020. “How Religion and Morality Correlate in Age of Society 5.0: Statistical Analysis of Emotional and Moral Associations with Buddhist Religious Terms Appearing on Japanese Blogs.” Cognitive Systems Research 59:329–44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos. 2004. “Elicitation of Expert Opinions for Uncertainty and Risk: Bilal M. Ayyub, CRC Press 2001, Hardcover, 328 Pages. ISBN: 0-8493-1087-3, $84.95.” International Journal of Forecasting 20(1):143–44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Norman, Don. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Okoli, Chitu, and Suzanne D. Pawlowski. 2004. “The Delphi Method as a Research Tool: An Example, Design Considerations and Applications.” Information & Management 42(1):15–29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. O'Malley, Claire, Giasemi Vavoula, J. P. Glew, Josie Taylor, Mike Sharples, Paul Lefrere, Peter Lonsdale, Laura Naismith, and Jenny Waycott. 2005. “Guidelines for Learning/Teaching/Tutoring in a Mobile Environment.”Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Othman, Muhamad Zulhelmi, Shahrul Kadri Ayop, Siti Nursaila Alias, Rahmat Raziman Salihuddin, and Sugeng Riyanto. 2022. “The Development of an Android Application of Terms Register in Malay–English for KSSM Physics and Its Usability among Student Teachers.” EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology 9:28–37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Penelope, M. Mullen. 2003. “Delphi: Myths and Reality.” Journal of Health Organization and Medicine 17(1):37–52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Perera, Ajith H., C. Ashton Drew, and Chris J. Johnson. 2011. Expert Knowledge and Its Application in Landscape Ecology. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Petrova, Iryna, Julia Sabadash, Olena Pavlova, Kateryna Haidukevych, Svitlana Oborska, and Lіudmyla Polishchuk. 2022. “Visualization of Culture Using Computer Technologies.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online) 17(10):51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Shneiderman, Ben, and Catherine Plaisant. 2010. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson Education India.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Skulmoski, Gregory J., Francis T. Hartman, and Jennifer Krahn. 2007. “The Delphi Method for Graduate Research.” Journal of Information Technology Education: Research 6(1):1–21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. So, Hyo-Jeong. 2012. “Turning on Mobile Learning in Asia: Illustrative Initiatives and Policy Implications.” Policy Focus: UNESCO Working Paper Series on Mobile Learning 1:1–32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Statista Research Department. 2021. “Mobile App Usage - Statistics & Facts.” Statista - The Statistics Portal (212):1–7. Retrieved (https://www.statista.com/topics/1002/mobile-app-usage/#dossierSummary).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Tang, Chia-Wei, and Cheng-Ta Wu. 2010. “Obtaining a Picture of Undergraduate Education Quality: A Voice from inside the University.” Higher Education 60(3):269–86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. UNCTAD. 2019. Creative Economy Outlook: Trends in International Trade in Creative Industries.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. UNESCO. 2020. “Cutting Edge | Protecting and Preserving Cultural Diversity in the Digital Era.” Retrieved January 12, 2022 (https://en.unesco.org/news/cutting-edge-protecting-and-preserving-cultural-diversity-digital-era).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Wahab, Deden A., Eko Budi Setiawan, and Rahma Wahdiniwaty. 2017. “Information Distribution Service of Tourism and Creative Industry Using Mobile Application Technology.” IJNMT (International Journal of New Media Technology) 4(2):120–25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Wahjudewanti, Alexandra Sinta, Jann Hidajat Tjakraatmaja, and Yudo Anggoro. 2021. “Knowledge Management Strategies to Improve Learning and Growth in Creative Industries: A Framework Model.” Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 4(2):1903–15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Development of Cultural Design Guidelines for Mobile Learning Applications for Creative Industry Communities
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICETM '22: Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Education Technology Management
          December 2022
          415 pages
          ISBN:9781450398015
          DOI:10.1145/3582580

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 May 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format