skip to main content
10.1145/3582700.3582718acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesahsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

DecluttAR: An Interactive Visual Clutter Dimming System to Help Focus on Work

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over time, the desks of office workers often get cluttered with documents, items, and other objects that are unrelated to the work being done. These objects become visual noise. Visual noise tends to reduce the worker’s concentration on their work. Therefore, it is desirable to have an uncluttered environment to work. We propose DecluttAR, a system that controls the visibility of clutter objects by using a video see-through head-mounted display and an RGB-D camera. Our system first generates a 3D model of the empty desk, and then automatically generates a 3D model of each object that is newly placed on the desk. Then, the user can interactively control each object’s visibility which is superimposed on the corresponding real object. Four types of object appearance adjustments are implemented: normal, grayscale, outline, and transparency. To investigate changes in the ability to concentrate in different appearances, a user study was conducted in which a simple arithmetic task was performed in four appearances. The results show that the number of answers in the arithmetic task for the transparent display increased compared to the normal display in the first half of the task. This result indicates that the participants are able to enter a state of concentration on the task more quickly by making the object invisible. In addition, the questionnaire-based subjective evaluation revealed that the transparent display had a lower workload and a higher user evaluation followed by the outline display.

References

  1. Jans Aasman, Gijsbertus Mulder, and Lambertus J. M. Mulder. 1987. Operator Effort and the Measurement of Heart-Rate Variability. Human Factors 29, 2 (1987), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088702900204Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Carmen Acosta, Juana Gallar, and Carlos Belmonte. 1999. The Influence of Eye Solutions on Blinking and Ocular Comfort at Rest and During Work at Video Display Terminals. Experimental Eye Research 68, 6 (1999), 663–669. https://doi.org/10.1006/exer.1998.0656Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Alan Allport, Elizabeth A Styles, and Shulan Hsieh. 1994. Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Attention and performance 15: Conscious and nonconscious information processing. Attention and performance series(1994), 421–452.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. George A Alvarez and Patrick Cavanagh. 2004. The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects. Psychological Science 15, 2 (2004), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502006.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Benjamin Avery, Christian Sandor, and Bruce H. Thomas. 2009. Improving Spatial Perception for Augmented Reality X-Ray Vision. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (Lafayette, Louisiana, USA) (VR ’09). 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2009.4811002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Janice Bagley and Leon Manelis. 1979. Effect of Awareness on an Indicator of Cognitive Load. Perceptual and Motor Skills 49, 2 (1979), 591–594. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1979.49.2.591Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Simon Banbury and D Berry. 2005. Office Noise and Employee Concentration: Identifying Causes of Disruption and Potential Improvements. Ergonomics 48(2005), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130412331311390Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Simon P Banbury, William J Macken, Sébastien Tremblay, and Dylan M Jones. 2001. Auditory Distraction and Short-Term Memory: Phenomena and Practical Implications. Human Factors 43, 1 (2001), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872001775992462Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Peter Barnum, Yaser Sheikh, Ankur Datta, and Takeo Kanade. 2009. Dynamic Seethroughs: Synthesizing Hidden Views of Moving Objects. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (Orlando, Florida, USA) (ISMAR ’09). 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2009.5336483Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ricardo Buettner, Hermann Baumgartl, and Daniel Sauter. 2019. Microsaccades as a Predictor of a User’s Level of Concentration: NeuroIS Retreat 2018. 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01087-4_21Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Diane M. Bunce, Elizabeth A. Flens, and Kelly Y. Neiles. 2010. How Long Can Students Pay Attention in Class? A Study of Student Attention Decline Using Clickers. Journal of Chemical Education 87, 12 (2010), 1438–1443. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100409pGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Yi Fei Cheng, Hang Yin, Yukang Yan, Jan Gugenheimer, and David Lindlbauer. 2022. Towards Understanding Diminished Reality. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Article 549, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517452Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Charles E. Connor, Howard E. Egeth, and Steven Yantis. 2004. Visual Attention: Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down. Current Biology 14, 19 (2004), R850–R852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.041Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Human Mental Workload, Peter A. Hancock and Najmedin Meshkati (Eds.). Advances in Psychology, Vol. 52. North-Holland, 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Morris K. Holland and Gerald Tarlow. 1972. Blinking and Mental Load. Psychological Reports 31, 1 (1972), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1972.31.1.119Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Sei Ikeda, Iwao Takemura, Asako Kimura, and Fumihisa Shibata. 2018. Diminished Reality System Based on Open-Source Software for Self-Driving Mobility. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (Munich, Germany) (ISMAR-Adjunct ’18). 354–357. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2018.00103Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Laurent Itti. 2000. Models of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Visual Attention.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Susanna Järvelin-Pasanen, Sanna Sinikallio, and Mika P Tarvainen. 2018. Heart Rate Variability and Occupational Stress—systematic Review Susanna. Industrial Health 56, 6 (2018), 500–511. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2017-0190Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Denis Kalkofen, Eduardo Veas, Stefanie Zollmann, Markus Steinberger, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2013. Adaptive Ghosted Views for Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (Adelaide, SA, Australia) (ISMAR ’13). 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2013.6671758Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Robert S Kennedy, Norman E Lane, Kevin S Berbaum, and Michael G Lilienthal. 1993. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3, 3 (1993), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Masaki Koshi, Nobuchika Sakata, and Kiyoshi Kiyokawa. 2019. Augmented Concentration: Concentration Improvement by Visual Noise Reduction with a Video See-Through HMD. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 1030–1031. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8798194Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Nilli Lavie. 1995. Perceptual Load as a Necessary Condition for Selective Attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance 21, 3(1995), 451. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213897Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Nilli Lavie and Yehoshua Tsal. 1994. Perceptual Load as a Major Determinant of the Locus of Selection in Visual Attention. Perception & psychophysics 56, 2 (1994), 183–197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Leila Lee, Seungwoo Je, Rachel Kim, Himanshu Verma, Hamed Alavi, and Andrea Bianchi. 2022. Partitioning Open-plan Workspaces via Augmented Reality. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 26 (2022), 609–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-019-01306-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Klemen Lilija, Henning Pohl, Sebastian Boring, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2019. Augmented Reality Views for Occluded Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, UK) (CHI ’19). 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300676Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Steve Mann. 1994. Mediated reality. (1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Steve Mann. 1999. Mediated Reality. Linux J. 1999, 59es (1999), 5–es.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ricardo Mateo, Jose Hernandez, Carmen Jaca, and Szabolcs Blazsek. 2013. Effects of Tidy/messy Work Environment on Human Accuracy. Management Decision 51(2013), 1861–1877. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2013-0084Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Mark McGill, Daniel Boland, Roderick Murray-Smith, and Stephen Brewster. 2015. A Dose of Reality: Overcoming Usability Challenges in VR Head-Mounted Displays. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2143–2152. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702382Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Rebecca Michael and Renata Meuter. 2006. Sustained Attention and Hypovigilance: The Effect of Environmental Monotony on Continuous Task Performance and Implications for Road Safety. In Proceedings of the 2006 Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Brett R.C. Molesworth, Marion Burgess, and Daniel Kwon. 2013. The use of noise cancelling headphones to improve concurrent task performance in a noisy environment. Applied Acoustics 74, 1 (2013), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.06.015Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Stephen Monsell. 2003. Task Switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 3 (2003), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Shohei Mori, Sei Ikeda, and Hideo Saito. 2017. A survey of Diminished Reality: Techniques for Visually Concealing, Eliminating, and Seeing through Real Objects. IPSJ Transactions on Computer Vision and Applications 9 (2017), 1–14. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41074-017-0028-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Shohei Mori, Momoko Maezawa, and Hideo Saito. 2017. A Work Area Visualization by Multi-View Camera-Based Diminished Reality. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 1 (2017), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti1030018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Gijsbertus Mulder and Lambertus JM Mulder. 1981. Information Processing and Cardiovascular Control. Psychophysiology 18, 4 (1981), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb02470.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Gillian Murphy and Ciara M. Greene. 2016. Perceptual Load Affects Eyewitness Accuracy and Susceptibility to Leading Questions. Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01322Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Sudi Patel, Ross Henderson, L Bradley, B Galloway, and L Hunter. 1991. Effect of Visual Display Unit Use on Blink Rate and Tear Stability. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry 68(1991), 888–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199111000-00010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. François Rameau, Hyowon Ha, Kyungdon Joo, Jinsoo Choi, Kibaek Park, and In So Kweon. 2016. A Real-Time Augmented Reality System to See-Through Cars. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 11(2016), 2395–2404. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2593768Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Catherine Roster and Joseph Ferrari. 2020. Does Work Stress Lead to Office Clutter, and How? Mediating Influences of Emotional Exhaustion and Indecision. Environment and Behavior(2020), 923–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518823041Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Sara L. Su, Frédo Durand, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2005. De-Emphasis of Distracting Image Regions Using Texture Power Maps. In Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (A Coroña, Spain) (APGV ’05). 164. https://doi.org/10.1145/1080402.1080445Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Nash Unsworth and Matthew Robison. 2016. The Influence of Lapses of Attention on Working Memory Capacity. Memory & cognition 44 (10 2016), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0560-0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Ruud van den Brink, Peter Murphy, and Sander Nieuwenhuis. 2016. Pupil Diameter Tracks Lapses of Attention. PLOS ONE 11(2016), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165274Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Eduardo E. Veas, Erick Mendez, Steven K. Feiner, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2011. Directing Attention and Influencing Memory with Visual Saliency Modulation. In Proceedings of the 2011 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, Canada) (CHI ’11). 1471–1480. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979158Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Jeremy Wolfe, Aude Oliva, Todd Horowitz, Serena Butcher, and Aline Bompas. 2003. Segmentation of Objects from Backgrounds in Visual Search Tasks. Vision research 42, 28 (2003), 2985–3004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00388-7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Linyan Xue, Dan Huang, Tong Wang, Qiyi Hu, Xinyu Chai, Liming Li, and Yao Chen. 2017. Dynamic modulation of the perceptual load on microsaccades during a selective spatial attention task. Scientific reports 7, 1 (2017), 16496.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. DecluttAR: An Interactive Visual Clutter Dimming System to Help Focus on Work

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          AHs '23: Proceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference 2023
          March 2023
          395 pages
          ISBN:9781450399845
          DOI:10.1145/3582700

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 March 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)156
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format