Cited By
View all- Connolly R(2023)Why We Should Supplement Ethics with CitizenshipProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Information Technology for Social Good10.1145/3582515.3609519(68-73)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2023
Datafication, Platformization, Algorithmic Governance, and Digital Sovereignty: Four Concepts You Should Teach
References
[1]
Abebe, R., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., Levy, K., Raghavan, M., and Robinson, D. G., Roles for Computing in Social Change, Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (2020): 272--283.
[2]
ABET. (2016). Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs, 2017--2018. http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-computing-programs-2017-2018/. Accessed 2023 Jan 8.
[3]
ACM. Computer Engineering Curricula 2016. https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/ce2016-final-report.pdf. Accessed 2023 Jan 9.
[4]
ACM & IEEE (2018). ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics. Accessed 2023 Jan 8.
[5]
Arendt, H. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. (NY: Penguin Books, 1963).
[6]
Beck, U. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Trans. Mark Ritter. (London: Sage Books, 1986).
[7]
Bietti, E. From Ethics Washing to Ethics Bashing: A Moral Philosophy View on Tech Ethics. Journal of Social Computing, 2, 3 (2022): 266--283.
[8]
Birch, K., and Cochrane, D. T. Big Tech: Four Emerging Forms of Digital Rentiership. Science as Culture, 31, 1 (2021): 44--58.
[9]
Birch, K., Chiappetta, M., and Artyushina, A. The problem of innovation in technoscientific capitalism: data rentiership and the policy implications of turning personal digital data into a private asset. Policy Studies, 41, 5, (2020): 468--487.
[10]
Bowyer, B. and Kahne, J. The digital dimensions of civic education: Assessing the effects of learning opportunities. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 69 (2020): 101162.
[11]
Branch, A. Global Supply Chain Management and International Logistics. (NY: Routledge, 2008).
[12]
Broussard, M. Artificial unintelligence: How computers misunderstand the world. (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2018).
[13]
Ceruzzi, P. E. A history of modern computing. (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003).
[14]
Cioffi, J. W., Kenney, M. F., & Zysman, J. Platform power and regulatory politics: Polanyi for the twenty-first century. New Political Economy. (2022): 1--17.
[15]
Connolly, R. Beyond good and evil impacts: rethinking the social issues components in our computing curricula. Proceedings of the 16th annual joint conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. (2011): 228--232.
[16]
Connolly, R. Why computing belongs within the social sciences. Communications of the ACM, 63, 8 (2020): 54--59.
[17]
Connolly, R. From Ethics to Politics: Changing Approaches to AI Education. Handbook of Critical AI. Simon Lindgren (Ed). (London: Edward Elgar Publishers, In Press).
[18]
Connolly, Randy. Can Citizenship Education Benefit Computing? Informatics 9, 4 (2022): 93.
[19]
Couldry, N., and Mejias, U. A. Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data's Relation to the Contemporary Subject. Television & New Media. 20, 4 (2018): 336--349.
[20]
Couldry, N., and Mejias, U. Making data colonialism liveable: How might data's social order be regulated? Internet Policy Review, 8, 2 (2019):1--16.
[21]
Couldry, N., and Mejias, U. A. The decolonial turn in data and technology research: what is at stake and where is it heading? Information, Communication & Society. (2021): 1--17.
[22]
Couture, S., and Toupin, S. What does the notion of "sovereignty" mean when referring to the digital? New Media & Society, 21, 10 (2019): 2305--2322.
[23]
Coyne, R. Technoromanticism: digital narrative, holism, and the romance of the real. (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999).
[24]
Crawford, K. The atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. (New Haven, Yale University Press, 2021).
[25]
CSTA Standards. (2017). CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards (Rev. ed). Retrieved from https://www.csteachers.org/page/standards.
[26]
Fay, R. A Model for Global Governance of Platforms. Regulating Big Tech, edited by D. Moore and M. Tambini (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021).
[27]
Fiesler, C., Garrett, N., and Beard, N. What do we teach when we teach tech ethics? A syllabi analysis. Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, (2020): 289--295.
[28]
Flensburg, S. and Lomborg, S. Datafication research: Mapping the field for a future agenda. New Media & Society. (2021): 14614448211046616.
[29]
Flew, T. The Platformized Internet: Issues for Media Law and Policy. (2019). Available at SSRN 3395901.
[30]
Fuchs, C. The information economy and the labor theory of value. International Journal of Political Economy, 46, 1 (2017): 65--89.
[31]
Grabher, G. and König, J. Disruption, Embedded. A Polanyian Framing of the Platform Economy. Sociologica, 14, 1 (2020):95--118.
[32]
Green, B. Data Science as Political Action: Grounding Data Science in a Politics of Justice. Journal of Social Computing, 2, 3 (2022): 249--265.
[33]
Green, B. and Viljoen, S. Algorithmic realism: expanding the boundaries of algorithmic thought. Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability and transparency (2020):19--31.
[34]
Greene, D., Hoffmann, A. L., and Stark, L. Better, nicer, clearer, fairer: A critical assessment of the movement for ethical artificial intelligence and machine learning. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2019): 2122--2131.
[35]
Gritsenko, D. and Wood, M. Algorithmic governance: A modes of governance approach. Regulation & Governance, 16, 1 (2022): 45--62.
[36]
Haggart, B. and Keller, C. I. Democratic legitimacy in global platform governance. Telecommunications Policy, 45, 6 (2021): 102152.
[37]
Helberger, N. The Political Power of Platforms: How Current Attempts to Regulate Misinformation Amplify Opinion Power. Digital Journalism, 8, 6 (2020): 842--854.
[38]
Hendrikse, R., Adriaans, I., Klinge, T. J., and Fernandez, R. The Big Techification of Everything. Science as Culture. 31, 1 (2021): 59--71.
[39]
Herkert, J. R. Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 11, 3 (2005): 373--385.
[40]
Hess, J. L. and Fore, G.A. Systematic literature review of US engineering ethics interventions. Science and engineering ethics, 24, 2 (2018): 551--583.
[41]
Hildebrandt, M. Algorithmic regulation and the rule of law. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376, 2128 (2018): 20170355.
[42]
Hildebrandt, M. Understanding law and the rule of law. Communications of the ACM, 64, 5 (2021): 28--31.
[43]
Hofmann, J. Multi-stakeholderism in Internet governance: putting a fiction into practice. Journal of Cyber Policy, 1, 1 (2016): 29--49.
[44]
Issar, S. and Aneesh, A. What is algorithmic governance? Sociology Compass, 16, 1 (2022): e12955.
[45]
Johnson, D.G. Computer Ethics. (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1985).
[46]
Just, N. and Latzer, M. Governance by algorithms: reality construction by algorithmic selection on the Internet. Media, Culture & Society, 39, 2 (2017): 238--258.
[47]
Katzenbach, C. and Bächle, T. C. Defining concepts of the digital society. Internet Policy Review, 8, 4 (2019).
[48]
Katzenbach, C. and Ulbricht, L. Algorithmic governance. Internet Policy Review, 8, 4 (2019): 1--8.
[49]
König, P. D. Two tales about the power of algorithms in online environments: on the need for transdisciplinary dialogue in the study of algorithms and digital capitalism. Media, Culture & Society, (2022): 016344372211118.
[50]
Krafft, T. D., Zweig, K. A. and König, P. D. How to regulate algorithmic decision-making: A framework of regulatory requirements for different applications. Regulation & Governance, 16, 1 (2022): 119--136.
[51]
Langley, P. and Leyshon, A. Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalization of digital economic circulation. Finance and Society, 3, 1 (2017): 11--31.
[52]
Manning, N. and Edwards, K. Does civic education for young people increase political participation? A systematic review. Educational Review, 66, 1 (2014): 22--45.
[53]
Metcalf, J., Moss, E., and boyd, danah. Owning Ethics: Corporate Logics, Silicon Valley, and the Institutionalization of Ethics. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 86, 2 (2019): 449--476.
[54]
Nemitz, P. Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376, 2133 (2018): 20180089.
[55]
Nieborg, D.B. and Helmond, A. The political economy of Facebook's platformization in the mobile ecosystem: Facebook Messenger as a platform instance. Media, Culture & Society. 41, 2 (2019): 196--218.
[56]
Nissenbaum, H. Accountability in a computerized society. Science and engineering ethics, 2, 1 (1996): 25--42.
[57]
Pangrazio, L. Reconceptualising critical digital literacy, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37, 2 (2016): 163--174.
[58]
Phan, T., Goldenfein, J., Mann, M., and Kuch, D. Economies of Virtue: The Circulation of 'Ethics' in Big Tech. Science as Culture, 31, 1 (2021): 121--135.
[59]
Pickard, V. A New Social Contract for Platforms. Regulating Big Tech, edited by D. Moore and M. Tambini (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021).
[60]
Pistor, K. Statehood in the digital age. Constellations, 27, 1 (2020): 3--18.
[61]
Pohle, J. and Thiel, T. Digital sovereignty. Internet Policy Review, 9, 4, (2020): 1--19.
[62]
Polanyi, K. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. (New York: Beacon Press, 1944).
[63]
Rahman, K. S. and Thelen, K. The Rise of the Platform Business Model and the Transformation of Twenty-First-Century Capitalism. Politics & Society, 47, 2 (2019): 177--204.
[64]
Reynolds, G. Ethics in Information Technology. (New York: Course Technology, 2003).
[65]
Sadowski, J. When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society, 6, 1 (2019): 2053951718820549.
[66]
Sadowski, J. The Internet of Landlords: Digital Platforms and New Mechanisms of Rentier Capitalism. Antipode, 52, 2 (2020): 562--580.
[67]
Shibutani, T. Social processes: An introduction to sociology. (iUniverse, 2000).
[68]
Smuha, N. A. Beyond the individual: governing Al's societal harm. Internet Policy Review, 10, 3 (2021): 1--32.
[69]
Srnicek, N. Platform capitalism (NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2017).
[70]
Stahl, B. C. From computer ethics and the ethics of Al towards an ethics of digital ecosystems. AI and Ethics 1, (2021): 1--13.
[71]
Stahl, B. C., Timmermans, J., and Mittelstadt, B. D. The ethics of computing: A survey of the computing-oriented literature. ACM Computing Surveys, 48, 4 (2016): 1--38.
[72]
Tambini, D. & Moore, M. Introduction. Regulating Big Tech, edited by D. Moore and M. Tambini (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021).
[73]
Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. Nudge (New Haven, Yale University Press, 2008).
[74]
Thatcher, J., O'Sullivan, D. and Mahmoudi, D. Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34, 6 (2016): 990--1006.
[75]
Tomašev, N., Cornebise, J., Hutter, F. et al. Al for social good: unlocking the opportunity for positive impact. Nature Communications 11, (2020): 2468.
[76]
Ulbricht, L. and Yeung, K. Algorithmic regulation: A maturing concept for investigating regulation of and through algorithms. Regulation & Governance, 16, 1 (2022): 3--22.
[77]
Vakil, S. Ethics, Identity, and Political Vision: Toward a Justice-Centered Approach to Equity in Computer Science Education. Harvard Educational Review, 88, 1 (2018): 26--52.
[78]
van Dijck, J. "Governing digital societies: Private platforms, public values." Computer Law & Security Review, 36 (2020): 105377.
[79]
Van de Poel, I., Nihlén Fahlquist, J., Doorn, N., Zwart, S., and Royakkers, L. The problem of many hands: Climate change as an example. Science and engineering ethics, 18, 1 (2012): 49--67.
[80]
WSJ. EU Starts Preliminary Probe into Amazon's Treatment of Merchants. Wall Street Journal. Sept. 19, 2018. Accessed 2023 Jan 10.
[81]
Washington, A. L. and Kuo, R. S. Whose Side are Ethics Codes On? Power Responsibility and the Social Good. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 10 (2020).
[82]
Westheimer, J. and Kahne, J. What Kind of Citizen? The Politics of Educating for Democracy. American Educational Research Journal 41, 2 (2004): 237--269.
[83]
Yeung, K. 'Hypernudge': Big Data as a mode of regulation by design. Information, Communication & Society, 20, 1 (2017): 118--136.
[84]
Yeung, K. Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12, 4 (2018): 505--523.
[85]
Yeung, K. Five fears about mass predictive personalization in an age of surveillance capitalism. International Data Privacy Law, 8, 3 (2018): 258--269.
[86]
Yu, J., Ruppert, J., Roque, R., Kirshner, B. Youth civic engagement through computing. ACM Inroads, 11 (2020): 11, 42--51.
[87]
Zuboff, S. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power (Profile Books, 2019).
Index Terms
- Datafication, Platformization, Algorithmic Governance, and Digital Sovereignty: Four Concepts You Should Teach
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Promoting social participation through digital governance: identifying barriers in the brazilian public administration
dg.o '18: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data AgePublic organizations are expanding their use of the democratic potential of information and communication technologies to promote the engagement of civil society in their organizational processes. Therefore, it is possible to perceive the transformation ...
Digital Governance and Individuals' Empowerment: a Conceptual Framework and Some Preliminary Results
ICEGOV '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceAdoption of information and communication technologies (ICT) in governance contexts is considered empowering for governments and the citizens. Digital governance aims at transforming internal processes, structures and working practices leading to ...
Individual Empowerment through Digital Governance: Proposing an Assessment Framework for India
ICEGOV '17: Proceedings of the Special Collection on eGovernment Innovations in IndiaAdoption of information and communication technologies (ICT) in governance contexts is considered empowering for governments and citizens. Digital Governance aims at transforming internal processes, structures and working practices leading to greater ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
March 2023
49 pages
ISSN:2153-2184
EISSN:2153-2192
DOI:10.1145/3585081
- Editors:
- Margaret Hamilton,
- James Harland
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 21 February 2023
Published in INROADS Volume 14, Issue 1
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 247Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)62
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Connolly R(2023)Why We Should Supplement Ethics with CitizenshipProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Information Technology for Social Good10.1145/3582515.3609519(68-73)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2023
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderDigital Edition
View this article in digital edition.
Digital EditionMagazine Site
View this article on the magazine site (external)
Magazine Site