skip to main content
10.1145/3583120.3589827acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Poster Abstract: Checkpointing in Transiently Powered IoT Networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

One of the major shortcomings in IoT/sensor networks is the finite energy supply available for computation and communication. To circumvent this issue, energy harvesting has been proposed to enable embedded devices to mitigate their dependency on traditional battery-driven power source. However, energy supply due to energy harvesting often varies, leading to nodes crashing due to energy exhaustion, with application(s) losing their state. Efficient state checkpointing in non-volatile memory (NMV) has been proposed to enable forward progress, albeit at the expense of significant overhead (viz., energy and time). In this poster, we show preliminary results that, for a certain class of applications, state checkpointing may adversely affect the performance of the applications. This is different from checkpointing in traditional distributed systems, where the network topology is generally assumed to be stable.

References

  1. Saad Ahmed, Naveed Anwar Bhatti, Muhammad Hamad Alizai, Junaid Haroon Siddiqui, and Luca Mottola. 2020. Fast and energy-efficient state checkpointing for intermittent computing. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (TECS) 19, 6 (2020), 1–27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Naveed Bhatti and Luca Mottola. 2016. Efficient state retention for transiently-powered embedded sensing. In International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks. 137–148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Naveed Anwar Bhatti and Luca Mottola. 2017. HarvOS: Efficient code instrumentation for transiently-powered embedded sensing. In 2017 16th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). IEEE, 209–220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Richard Koo and Sam Toueg. 1987. Checkpointing and rollback-recovery for distributed systems. IEEE Transactions on software Engineering1 (1987), 23–31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ajay D Kshemkalyani and Mukesh Singhal. 2011. Distributed computing: principles, algorithms, and systems. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Siba Mitra and Ajanta Das. 2017. Distributed fault tolerant architecture for wireless sensor network. Informatica 41, 1 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hasan Mohammad. 2022. State of IoT 2022: Number of connected IoT devices growing 18% to 14.4 billion globally. https://iot-analytics.com/number-connected-iot-devices/ (18,05,2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Teodora Sanislav, George Dan Mois, Sherali Zeadally, and Silviu Corneliu Folea. 2021. Energy harvesting techniques for internet of things (IoT). IEEE Access 9 (2021), 39530–39549.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Poster Abstract: Checkpointing in Transiently Powered IoT Networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IPSN '23: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks
        May 2023
        385 pages
        ISBN:9798400701184
        DOI:10.1145/3583120

        Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 May 2023

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate143of593submissions,24%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)66
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader