skip to main content
10.1145/3583133.3590602acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Performance Analysis of Hybrid Sampling and Meta-heuristics

Published:24 July 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates the effect of hybridising sampling algorithms with population-based meta-heuristics. Recent literature has shown that alternatives to the traditionally used pseudo-random number generators to generate the initial population of meta-heuristics can improve performance. However, most studies focus on sample sizes that are limited to the size of the initial populations. In contrast, this paper studies the effect of extended random initialisation, which uses relatively large samples and then initialises the meta-heuristics from the points in the sample with the best-found fitness values. A portfolio of three meta-heuristics, four sampling algorithms and three different sampling budgets are analysed from the fixed budget perspective on the BBOB benchmark suite. Statistical analysis of the results shows that the hybrid algorithms converge to better solutions than their non-hybrid counterparts. The results further indicate that large sample sizes can be used to generate landscape analysis features, ensuring reliable approximations of the investigated functions' properties without lessening the meta-heuristics' performance.

References

  1. Brian Beachkofski and Ramana Grandhi. 2002. Improved Distributed Hypercube Sampling. In 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. 1274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Mark F Bramlette. 1991. Initialization, mutation and selection methods in genetic algorithms for function optimization. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. 100--107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Rob Carnell. 2022. lhs: Latin Hypercube Samples. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lhs R package version 1.1.5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Joaquín Derrac, Salvador García, Daniel Molina, and Francisco Herrera. 2011. A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 1, 1 (2011), 3--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. John H Halton. 1960. On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals. Numer. Math. 2 (1960), 84--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. John M Hammersley. 1960. Monte Carlo methods for solving multivariable problems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 86, 3 (1960), 844--874.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Nikolaus Hansen, Dirk V Arnold, and Anne Auger. 2015. Evolution strategies. In Springer handbook of computational intelligence. Springer, 871--898.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Nikolaus Hansen, Steffen Finck, Raymond Ros, and Anne Auger. 2009. Real-parameter black-box optimization benchmarking 2009: Noiseless functions definitions. Research Report RR-6829. INRIA. https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00362633Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sture Holm. 1979. A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6, 2 (1979), 65--70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ryan Dieter Lang and Andries Petrus Engelbrecht. 2021. An Exploratory Landscape Analysis-Based Benchmark Suite. Algorithms 14, 3 (2021). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Qian Li, San-Yang Liu, and Xin-She Yang. 2020. Influence of initialization on the performance of metaheuristic optimizers. Applied Soft Computing 91 (2020), 106193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Millie Pant, Hira Zaheer, Laura Garcia-Hernandez, Ajith Abraham, et al. 2020. Differential Evolution: A review of more than two decades of research. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 90 (2020), 103479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dana Quade. 1979. Using Weighted Rankings in the Analysis of Complete Blocks with Additive Block Effects. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 74, 367 (1979), 680--683. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Shahryar Rahnamayan, Hamid R. Tizhoosh, and Magdy M.A. Salama. 2007. A novel population initialization method for accelerating evolutionary algorithms. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 53, 10 (2007), 1605--1614. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Rapin and O. Teytaud. 2018. Nevergrad - A gradient-free optimization platform. https://GitHub.com/FacebookResearch/Nevergrad.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Tareq M Shami, Ayman A El-Saleh, Mohammed Alswaitti, Qasem Al-Tashi, Mhd Amen Summakieh, and Seyedali Mirjalili. 2022. Particle swarm optimization: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access 10 (2022), 10031--10061.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Alaa Tharwat and Wolfram Schenck. 2021. Population initialization techniques for evolutionary algorithms for single-objective constrained optimization problems: Deterministic vs. stochastic techniques. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 67 (2021), 100952.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Performance Analysis of Hybrid Sampling and Meta-heuristics

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GECCO '23 Companion: Proceedings of the Companion Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
          July 2023
          2519 pages
          ISBN:9798400701207
          DOI:10.1145/3583133

          Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author(s)

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the owner/author(s).

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 24 July 2023

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

          Upcoming Conference

          GECCO '24
          Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 14 - 18, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)33
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader